U.S. And International Politics

[Tom Graves]

Some loony left-wing woman claimed Trump followed her into a department store and assaulted her decades ago.  She didn't file a report, no one saw the assault, she never mentioned it to anyone even in her diary and couldn't remember when it happened.  Decades later, NY suddenly changes its laws to allow the victims of sexual assault a window of opportunity to file civil claims.  And who comes forward?  This women who is backed by leftist attorneys for the sole purpose of filing a claim against Trump.  Trump denies the charge and they sue him for defamation.  She is awarded $83 million despite suffering no apparent damages.   You can't make that up.  Proclaiming your innocence is apparently defamation.

Dear Herr Schicklgruber I mean Herr Smith,

In addition to trusting "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin more than our own intelligence agencies, do you, like The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx"), sexually assault women in department store changing rooms?

-- Tom

[Richard Smith]

Dear Comrade Smith,

In addition to trusting "former" KGB counterintelligence officer Vladimir Putin more than our own intelligence agencies, do you, like The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx"), sexually assault women in department store changing rooms?

-- Tom

Comrade Tomsky.  No assault ever occurred.  Do you think Donald Trump randomly followed women into department stores to assault them?  And that no one noticed. And the "victim" never reported the assault to store security or the police.  And that she could not remember the day, month or even year of the assault.  And that she never mentioned the assault to a single person for decades.  And that NY suddenly decided decades later to suspend the statute of limitations to allow her to file a civil claim with the support of attorneys funded by leftist organizations.   And that it was defamation for Trump to claim he was innocent resulting in over $80 million in damages to her?  None of that concerns you as a defender of "democracy"?  Like all good Commies, it is not the persecution of the guilty but the innocent that makes an impression.

[Tom Graves]

Comrade Tomsky.  No assault ever occurred.  Do you think Donald Trump randomly followed women into department stores to assault them?  And that no one noticed. And the "victim" never reported the assault to store security or the police.  And that she could not remember the day, month or even year of the assault.  And that she never mentioned the assault to a single person for decades.  And that NY suddenly decided decades later to suspend the statute of limitations to allow her to file a civil claim with the support of attorneys funded by leftist organizations.   And that it was defamation for Trump to claim he was innocent resulting in over $80 million in damages to her?  None of that concerns you as a defender of "democracy"?  Like all good Commies, it is not the persecution of the guilty but the innocent that makes an impression.

Dear Herr Schicklgruber, I mean Herr Smith,

How many of those red pills did you take, anyway?

Bottom line: I never realized what a sick Puck you really are.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puck_(folklore)

-- Tom

[Benjamin Cole]

Regardless of one's partisan and ideological sentiments, the department-store case against Donald Trump is a travesty.

Witch-hunts can go in any direction. And they do.

[Tom Graves]

Regardless of one's partisan and ideological sentiments, the department-store case against Donald Trump is a travesty.

Witch-hunts can go in any direction. And they do.

The very existence of the traitorous orange bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") known as Donald J. Trump is The Greatest of all Travesties, the conviction of the aforementioned Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") for sexual assault in a department store changing room is a step in the right direction.

[Richard Smith]

The very existence of the traitorous orange bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") known as Donald J. Trump is The Greatest of all Travesties, the conviction of the aforementioned Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") for sexual assault in a department store changing room is a step in the right direction.

This demonstrates a great insight into the mind of a TDS sufferer.  Trump is deemed to be such a terrible person that the facts no longer matter.  It's about him and not the facts.  He must have done all sorts of terrible things despite the lack of evidence and logic.  Here Comrade Tomsky also demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the US legal system.  Trump was not "convicted" of sexual assault.  LOL.  This was a civil - not criminal trial - conducted solely for political purposes in the presence of a Trump hating judge.  Imagine if they had sued Biden for rape in some all-red county in the rural South based on the testimony of Tara Reade who claimed he raped her many years ago.  The verdict would have been the same but there is no credible evidence to support these claims. 

[Tom Graves]

This demonstrates a great insight into the mind of a TDS sufferer.  Trump is deemed to be such a terrible person that the facts no longer matter.  It's about him and not the facts.  He must have done all sorts of terrible things despite the lack of evidence and logic.  Here Comrade Tomsky also demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the US legal system.  Trump was not "convicted" of sexual assault.  LOL.  This was a civil - not criminal trial - conducted solely for political purposes in the presence of a Trump hating judge.  Imagine if they had sued Biden for rape in some all-red county in the rural South based on the testimony of Tara Reade who claimed he raped her many years ago.  The verdict would have been the same but there is no credible evidence to support these claims.

Dear Herr Schicklgruber, I mean Herr Smith,

I didn't realize that The Traitorous Orange Bird (rhymes with "Xxxx") was such a horrible person until he made fun of the physically handicapped "Libtard" journalist during the 2016 campaign.

Which you thought was hilarious, right?

And when I read the 13 July 2017 article by Craig Unger, "Trump's Russian Laundromat," that really sealed the deal (pardon the pun) for me.

Have you read it, yet?

Warning: It's paywalled.

https://newrepublic.com/article/143586/trumps-russian-laundromat-trump-tower-luxury-high-rises-dirty-money-international-crime-syndicate

-- Tom