Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: 3 shooters instead of 1?  (Read 4257 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2021, 06:42:11 PM »
Advertisement
Three shooters means three times as many assassins to be seen or get caught or keep quiet for eternity.  And, if there is anything the witnesses do agree on, it's that there were three or two shots fired all from one location.  They disagree on the location due to the sound distortions but almost no witness indicated they thought the shots originated from two different locations.  So one shooter firing three or two shots.

At least one of the shooters was using a .45 caliber weapon ( subsonic ) that was equipped with a silencer.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2021, 06:42:11 PM »


Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2021, 10:16:15 PM »
One of the assassins also had a bazooka but it failed to go off and he disappeared into the bushes.

Online Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1205
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2021, 02:53:36 PM »
The Pros of multiple shooters:

- increased odds of success. If one sniper misses, there are two others.
- the directions of the shots confuses the bystanders and law enforcement.
- There were a bunch of locations in Dealey Plaza for snipers to hide. TSBD sniper’s nest wouldn’t have been discovered if not for someone leaving evidence behind.

The Cons of multiple shooters:

- increased odds of someone getting caught before the mission is accomplished.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2021, 02:53:36 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #11 on: September 18, 2021, 04:48:10 PM »
The Pros of multiple shooters:

- increased odds of success. If one sniper misses, there are two others.
- the directions of the shots confuses the bystanders and law enforcement.
- There were a bunch of locations in Dealey Plaza for snipers to hide. TSBD sniper’s nest wouldn’t have been discovered if not for someone leaving evidence behind.

The Cons of multiple shooters:

- increased odds of someone getting caught before the mission is accomplished.

Concise and succinct Mr Banks.....   

The TSBD sniper’s nest wouldn’t have been discovered if not for someone leaving evidence behind.

That was a deliberate act Mr Banks....  They left the throw down evidence to lead to Lee Oswald....
 

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2021, 05:44:08 PM »
The Pros of multiple shooters:

- increased odds of success. If one sniper misses, there are two others.
- the directions of the shots confuses the bystanders and law enforcement.
- There were a bunch of locations in Dealey Plaza for snipers to hide. TSBD sniper’s nest wouldn’t have been discovered if not for someone leaving evidence behind.

The Cons of multiple shooters:

- increased odds of someone getting caught before the mission is accomplished.

What about the use of multiple different guns firing from different directions that would necessitate obtaining the bullets and fragments from the crime and access to the president's body to hide the evidence of other shooters.  A fairly big con!  If anyone is planning to frame Oswald as the assassin from the 6th floor window with a particular rifle, then the shooter uses that rifle and fires from that shooting location to avoid the risk and complexity of having to access the bullets and body after the fact. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #12 on: September 18, 2021, 05:44:08 PM »


Online Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1205
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #13 on: September 18, 2021, 07:59:29 PM »
What about the use of multiple different guns firing from different directions that would necessitate obtaining the bullets and fragments from the crime and access to the president's body to hide the evidence of other shooters.  A fairly big con!  If anyone is planning to frame Oswald as the assassin from the 6th floor window with a particular rifle, then the shooter uses that rifle and fires from that shooting location to avoid the risk and complexity of having to access the bullets and body after the fact.

If they intended to frame Oswald, they only needed to plant one rifle and three spent shells.

Obviously other snipers wouldn’t/didn’t leave rifles behind.




Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2021, 08:47:54 PM »
If they intended to frame Oswald, they only needed to plant one rifle and three spent shells.

Obviously other snipers wouldn’t/didn’t leave rifles behind.

If they intended to frame Oswald, they only needed to plant one rifle and three spent shells.

I believe the "They" in this case could have been Lee Oswald himself.....   He was playing the role of an ATTEMPTED assassin....

He thought that if Castro believed that he had tried to shoot JFK, then Fidel Castro would grant him asylum in Cuba.

Thus Lee wanted it to appear as if he had actually fired the carcano at JFK.... (And obviously millions of people do believe that)
 But in reality that old carcano was nothing but a stage prop and it never was fired that day....In Fact the carcano was already hidden beneath the pallet of books in the NW corner of the sixth floor at the time JFK was ambushed....And Lee was in the first floor lunchroom when JFK passed by the entrance to the TSBD.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #14 on: September 18, 2021, 08:47:54 PM »


Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
Re: 3 shooters instead of 1?
« Reply #15 on: September 19, 2021, 04:03:56 PM »
If they intended to frame Oswald, they only needed to plant one rifle and three spent shells.

Obviously other snipers wouldn’t/didn’t leave rifles behind.

How would they explain the fact that bullets or bullet fragments fired from rifles other than Oswald's MC rifle were found in the car or body?  And that they struck the body from directions other than from behind?   It is downright silly to suggest that the fantasy conspirators went to such pains to frame Oswald using a specific rifle and firing from a specific location, but then conduct the assassination with different rifles firing from different locations.  It's laughable.