Streets of Philadelphia

[Richard Smith]

As I said earlier; a perfect demonstration of a total lack of any sense of reality!

The law she violated is intended to protect public spaces from objectionable conduct.

Indeed, and she apparently violated that law four times.

This woman was arrested on a public sidewalk. 

Yes, so what? Are there specific places now where you can arrest somebody for violating the law four times?

She has to be committing some objectionable act in that area in the opinion of the authorities. 

Really? So if a guy robs a bank on Monday and on Tuesday he is just standing on the sidewalk doing nothing wrong, police can't arrest him? Is that your "logic"?

Her prior "violations" were for the same lawful conduct.  Praying.  She did not "rob a bank."  LOL.  Her only act was to pray. Multiple wrongs on behalf of the authorities do not make a right.  You must really hate religious people.  Particularly when they dissent from authoritarian leftist causes.

[Martin Weidmann]

Her prior "violations" were for the same lawful conduct.  Praying.  She did not "rob a bank."  LOL.  Her only act was to pray. Multiple wrongs on behalf of the authorities do not make a right.  You must really hate religious people.  Particularly when they dissent from authoritarian leftist causes.

Her prior "violations" were for the same lawful conduct.

Nope... her prior violations were for intimidation of women visiting the abortion center.

You really need to do some research before you (once again) expose your ignorance!

You must really hate religious people.

Not really, but I don't like fanatical zealots who try to impose their opinion on other people.

Particularly when they dissent from authoritarian leftist causes.

Like what? Be precise....

[Richard Smith]

Her prior "violations" were for the same lawful conduct.

Nope... her prior violations were for intimidation of women visiting the abortion center.

You really need to do some research before you (once again) expose your ignorance!

You must really hate religious people.

Not really, but I don't like fanatical zealots who try to impose their opinion on other people.

Particularly when they dissent from authoritarian leftist causes.

Like what? Be precise....

Isn't it late in "Europe"?  LOL.  Her acts of intimidation were praying.  Like yourself, some people find that objectionable and worthy of arrest.  The leftist cause here is not a mystery.  The authorities have imposed a censorship zone around an abortion clinic.  They use that as a pretext to arrest dissenters.  No praying allowed there.

[Martin Weidmann]

Isn't it late in "Europe"?  LOL.  Her acts of intimidation were praying.  Like yourself, some people find that objectionable and worthy of arrest.  The leftist cause here is not a mystery.  The authorities have imposed a censorship zone around an abortion clinic.  They use that as a pretext to arrest dissenters.  No praying allowed there.

Isn't it late in "Europe"?

Not really, no

Her acts of intimidation were praying.

No, there were not, but since you keep repeating it; prove it. Show us the charges filed against her.

Like yourself, some people find that objectionable and worthy of arrest.

Wrong again. If it was only praying it would not be worthy of arrest.

The leftist cause here is not a mystery.  The authorities have imposed a censorship zone around an abortion clinic.

And there we have it. Unlike in the US, in England abortion is legal and women who visit a clinic should be able to do so without being accosted by fanatic religious zealots.

What makes you think that whatever you believe is more important than a woman's right to decide about her own body and life?

Let me ask you a question; is there anything that you don't hate?

[Richard Smith]

Isn't it late in "Europe"?

Not really, no

Her acts of intimidation were praying.

No, there were not, but since you keep repeating it; prove it. Show us the charges filed against her.

Like yourself, some people find that objectionable and worthy of arrest.

Wrong again. If it was only praying it would not be worthy of arrest.

The leftist cause here is not a mystery.  The authorities have imposed a censorship zone around an abortion clinic.

And there we have it. Unlike in the US, in England abortion is legal and women who visit a clinic should be able to do so without being accosted by fanatic religious zealots.

What makes you think that whatever you believe is more important than a woman's right to decide about her own body and life?

Let me ask you a question; is there anything that you don't hate?

A woman arrested for silently praying is a "religious zealot", "religious nutjob" and "religious fanatic" according to Martin.  See any theme?  But without missing a beat, he tells us this has nothing to do with religion.  HA HA HA.  Unreal.   No one said anything about the subject of abortion.  The obvious point is that leftist have created this "zone" around an abortion clinic as a pretext for arresting peaceful dissenters because abortion is a sacred leftist cause.  It is a way for the authoritarians to suppress free speech and religious liberties via a zoning regulation.  Then argue, as you have stupidly done, that this all has nothing to do with religious liberties.  Whether abortion is good, bad or indifferent is not the issue.  This woman was singled out for prosecution because she dared to dissent against abortion.  Not because she committed any crime. 

[Martin Weidmann]

A woman arrested for silently praying is a "religious zealot", "religious nutjob" and "religious fanatic" according to Martin.  See any theme?  But without missing a beat, he tells us this has nothing to do with religion.  HA HA HA.  Unreal.   No one said anything about the subject of abortion.  The obvious point is that leftist have created this "zone" around an abortion clinic as a pretext for arresting peaceful dissenters because abortion is a sacred leftist cause.  It is a way for the authoritarians to suppress free speech and religious liberties via a zoning regulation.  Then argue, as you have stupidly done, that this all has nothing to do with religious liberties.  Whether abortion is good, bad or indifferent is not the issue.  This woman was singled out for prosecution because she dared to dissent against abortion.  Not because she committed any crime.

Why don't you fly to Birmingham and tell it to the Judge and Jury at her trial, troll.

[Richard Smith]

Why don't you fly to Birmingham and tell it to the Judge and Jury at her trial, troll.

Such an angry guy.  Make you a deal.  I'll do that when you go to the NY Times or Tucker Carlson and provide them with your "evidence" that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."  Thereby proving a conspiracy in the assassination of the US president.  HA HA HA.  Make sure to bring a suitcase because the mental health authorities may offer you accommodations for a lengthy stay.

[Martin Weidmann]

Such an angry guy.  Make you a deal.  I'll do that when you go to the NY Times or Tucker Carlson and provide them with your "evidence" that Oswald "didn't come down the stairs."  Thereby proving a conspiracy in the assassination of the US president.  HA HA HA.  Make sure to bring a suitcase because the mental health authorities may offer you accommodations for a lengthy stay.

There it is again; desperation on full display! Dishonestly asking for evidence of something that didn't happen in order to weasel out of another mess he has gotten himself into.

Not the first time and it won't be the last.