More personal insults. This woman was doing nothing other than standing silently and praying. She was arrested for that. If the ONLY thing you are doing is praying when you are arrested, and the police ask "Are you praying?" just before arresting her, that means she was arrested for praying. It is literally the only thing she was doing at the time of her arrest. If she had been drunk, and the police officer had asked "Have you been drinking?" and she said "Yes" just before arresting her, she would have been under arrest for being drunk. The fact that she has exercised her religious liberties on prior occasions in a similar manner does not justify her arrest. Her behavior was entirely lawful on this occasion and any prior occasion in which she peacefully exercised her right to pray. Every person who believes in human rights should support the ability to pray without fear of arrest. The act she is under arrest for is praying in public. That is simply a fact even if the charge is a violation of an ordinance. It was the only act she was performing when she was arrested.
The act she is under arrest for is praying in public. That is simply a fact even if the charge is a violation of an ordinance. She is charged with violating a lawful order four times and will go to court for that. But that doesn't stop our resident fool (who has never been in Europe and is clueless about the English legal system) to disagree and make up a bogus story about her being arrested for praying.
It's not only hilarious but also a perfect demonstration of a total lack of any sense of reality, which he also displays frequently in the Kennedy case. Ignoring the actual evidence, misrepresenting facts and making up stories he can't support with any evidence is Richard's trademark! (*)
The bottom line is here that a bogus story of an innocent bystander arrested for praying makes for a far more dramatics (in Richard's mind) than the story of a religious nutjob who is known for intimidation of women visiting abortion centers and who gets arrested for several violations of a lawful city ordinance.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*) Richard once claimed that the evidence for Oswald coming down the TSBD stairs unnoticed after the shots was that it happened! Says it all, really...