Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald: No power lunch  (Read 55449 times)

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #256 on: September 09, 2021, 04:15:48 PM »
Advertisement




This map provides a great visual to what occurred in the movements of Styles and Adams. The WC put this question to rest in April of 1964 by providing time stamps to their movements.

Styles and Adams, left the fourth floor at approximately 12:35 and hurried through the TSBD where they encountered Shelley and Lovelady near the first floor elevator. Why that is important is Shelley and Lovelady had traveled around the area before returning to the TSBD. Styles and Adams, after having encountered Shelley and Lovelady near the elevator, were stopped by the Police as they exited the rear of the TSBD near the dock. Styles and Adams were told to return to the building which they did but they followed the RR track spur running alongside the building walking back to Elm Street. Both statements leave no confusion as to where they encountered the police after 12:36 and how they returned to the front of the building before 12:37.

Adams statement is telling because she states she went "southwest" where from any other place but the back of the building doesn't lead to Elm Street.

Styles statement is telling from the standpoint she states they went "around to the front of the building" which given the nature of the layout of the track describes it perfectly.

Miss ADAMS - I went back, only I went southwest.

Styles: "...We then went around to the side of the building where we saw a policeman talking to someone whom I did not recognize. I was told by a policeman to go around to the front of the building and out of that area...."

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #256 on: September 09, 2021, 04:15:48 PM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #257 on: September 09, 2021, 04:31:30 PM »



This map provides a great visual to what occurred in the movements of Styles and Adams. The WC put this question to rest in April of 1964 by providing time stamps to their movements.

Styles and Adams, left the fourth floor at approximately 12:35 and hurried through the TSBD where they encountered Shelley and Lovelady near the first floor elevator. Why that is important is Shelley and Lovelady had traveled around the area before returning to the TSBD. Styles and Adams, after having encountered Shelley and Lovelady near the elevator, were stopped by the Police as they exited the rear of the TSBD near the dock. Styles and Adams were told to return to the building which they did but they followed the RR track spur running alongside the building walking back to Elm Street. Both statements leave no confusion as to where they encountered the police after 12:36 and how they returned to the front of the building before 12:37.

Adams statement is telling because she states she went "southwest" where from any other place but the back of the building doesn't lead to Elm Street.

Styles statement is telling from the standpoint she states they went "around to the front of the building" which given the nature of the layout of the track describes it perfectly.

Miss ADAMS - I went back, only I went southwest.

Styles: "...We then went around to the side of the building where we saw a policeman talking to someone whom I did not recognize. I was told by a policeman to go around to the front of the building and out of that area...."

So, what you are actually trying to say is that Adams and Styles needed no more that 2 minutes to (1) go down the stairs, (2) leave the building at the back and walk around the loading dock towards the railway yard, (3) go round the building including the annex next to railway tracks and (4) walk down the street in front of the TSBD towards the main entrance?

All that in 2 minutes or less? Really?   :D

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3013
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #258 on: September 10, 2021, 02:23:10 AM »
Do you think that all these men were involved and to what extent and what motivated them to "lie"?

JohnM

No, I don't think all these men were involved and they lied for very different reasons.
The point is, they all lied in their various statements and I don't see how that fits in with just a bunch of normal working guys going about their day. The were questioned by the DPD, the FBI and the SS in an era when these institutions were feared.
If you don't believe they did lie, we can have that conversation.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #258 on: September 10, 2021, 02:23:10 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #259 on: September 10, 2021, 04:16:58 AM »
Styles and Adams, left the fourth floor at approximately 12:35 ... they returned to the front of the building before 12:37.

Ah, but:

Miss ADAMS. When I got there (the front of the building, A.F.), I happened to look around and noticed several of the employees, and I noticed Joe Molina, for one, was standing in front of the building, and also Avery Davis, who works with me, and I said, "What do you think has happened?" And she said, "I don't know."

Have you pondered the implications of the above for your timeline, Mr Nessan? It would seem not!

 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: September 10, 2021, 04:21:37 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #260 on: September 10, 2021, 08:01:05 AM »
Dan O posted an excellent map of the TSBD 1st floor........




 
That floor plan looks like a Robert Cutler draft.
My curiosity concerns the basement of the building. What is in that basement? Is it or not 100X100 feet square like the rest of the floors? What was in that basement back at the time of the assassination? Was the basement searched for possible hidden suspects when the cops stormed the building?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #260 on: September 10, 2021, 08:01:05 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7407
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #261 on: September 10, 2021, 11:49:54 AM »
To add to my previous reply to Mitch Todd, let's examine for a minute the hypocrisy of his position.

In his last post he wrote;


And there's one more thing to consider:

Adams testified that she saw Lovelady and Shelley on the first floor. She was allowed to review her testimony in print, and she literally signed off on it with not objections as to her testimony as to Lovelady and Shelley's presence in the first floor.


Although what he said is true, in as much as that it says that in her testimony and she did indeed sign the document, which btw happened several days after her testimony when somebody showed up at her workplace and asked her to sign it, after she initially waived signing it.

Todd's hypocrisy is nevertheless on full display, because in the same testimony, Adams also says;

Mr. BELIN - Sometime after the third shot, and I don't want to get into the actual period of time yet, you went back into the stockroom which would be to the north of where your offices are located on the fourth floor, is that correct?
Miss ADAMS - Yes, sir; that's correct.
Mr. BELIN - When you got into the stockroom, where did you go?
Miss ADAMS - I went to the back stairs.


and

Mr. BELIN - How long do you think it was between the time the shots were fired and the time you left the window to start toward the stairway?
Miss ADAMS - Between 15 and 30 seconds, estimated, approximately.
Mr. BELIN - How long do you think it was, or do you think it took you to get from the window to the top of the fourth floor stairs?
Miss ADAMS - I don't think I can answer that question accurately, because the time approximation, without a stopwatch, would be difficult.
Mr. BELIN - How long do you think it took you. to get from the window to the bottom of the stairs on the first floor?
Miss ADAMS - I would say no longer than a minute at the most.
Mr. BELIN - So you think that from the time you left the window on the fourth floor until the time you got to the stairs at the bottom of the first floor, was approximately 1 minute?
Miss ADAMS - Yes, approximately.


yet Todd completely ignores that and dismisses it, while at the same time attaching great importance to the Shelley/Lovelady remark.

It is obvious there is a great discrepancy between the two remarks, as the Shelley/Lovelady remark implies that Adams and Styles left the 4th floor much later than Adams testified she did. When there are two contradicting statements from a witness, the best way to determine which one is the correct statement is to look for corroboration.

Sow, let's see what Adams told the investigators prior to her testimony;

On 11/24/63 FBI agents Hardin and Scott wrote in their FD 302 report that Adams had said;

"She and her friend then ran immediately to the back of the building to where the stairs were located and ran down the stairs"

On 02/17/64 she told Jim Leavelle;

"After the third shot I went out the back door" and "The elevator was not running and there was no one on the stairs"

and on 03/23/64 she told the FBI

"After the third shot I observed the car carrying President Kennedy speed away. Sandra Styles and I then ran out of the building via the stairs"

In all these statements, Adams is perfectly consistent in saying that she and Styles ran to the stairs after the third shot

And Sandra Styles backs her up. In her statement to the FBI of 03/23/64 she said;

"I heard shots but thought at the time that they were fireworks. I was unaware of the place the shots came from. I saw people running and others lie down on the ground and realized something was happening but did not know exactly what was happening. Victoria Adams and I left the office at this time, went down the back stairs and left the building at the back door.

And then of course there is Dorothy Garner who, according to Martha Stroud, said she saw Baker and Truly come up after the girls (Adams and Styles) had gone down. Garner explained to Barry Ernest that she did not actually see the girls go down, but she could hear them on the noise stairs.

All these statements sufficiently corroborate Adams testimony - I am paraphrasing - that she and Styles left their position at the window and went to the stairs at the back of the building within seconds after the third shot.

Now let's examine what corroboration there is for the Shelley/Lovelady remark.

To say that there isn't any would be a misrepresentation of the facts, because Jim Leavelle wrote in his report of 02/17/64 that Adams said;

"I saw Mr. Shelley and another employee named Bill"

But that's about it.

Note that Adams did not say when and where she saw Shelley and Lovelady. That bit of information was only added on during her testimony on 04/07/64. It should also be noted that Adams was not included in the re-enactment of the events on 03/20/64, so before she even testified the WC lawyers were already not interested in what she had to say about what actually happened on 11/22/63.

Also note that Shelley, Lovelady and Sandra Styles did not confirm the alleged encounter on the first floor at the TSBD and that closer examination of Shelley's and Lovelady's actions after the shot show that both men were in the railway yard next to the TSBD until 12:35, which means there is no physical way Adams could have seen both men on the first floor if she came down the stairs immediately after the third shot. On the other hand, it is indeed possible that Adams saw Shelley and Lovelady in the railway yard as she passed the men on her way to the front entrance.

And finally it should be noted that on 04/04/64 WC assistant counsel Leon Hubert wrote a remarkable memo in which he refered to a recent staff meeting in which he had objected to what he called "editing of the transcripts of depositions". In the same memo he also complains about the practice of waiving signatures by the witnesses and advocates to have witnesses read and sign the transcript even if it contains errors, which according to him can later be rectified.

Now, isn't it just remarkable that Victoria Adams initially waived signing her testimony, as that would save her from having to return to sign it, only to be confronted by somebody at work a few days later who insisted she would sign after all. And isn't it just as remarkable that Victoria Adams told Barry Ernest that she never testified that she saw Shelley and Lovelady on the first floor?

« Last Edit: September 10, 2021, 01:57:32 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5022
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #262 on: September 10, 2021, 02:19:38 PM »
Oswald took a rifle to work and assassinated the President.

That's a gross over simplification, and you should be embarrassed to post such silliness.

You've been around long enough to know that nobody can prove that Lee took a rifle to work , and in fact there is strong evidence that refutes the idea. 

And Lee had a very strong alibi that refutes any contention that he was on the sixth floor at the alleged "Sniper's Nest " at the time that JFK was murdered.  Lee said that he was in the 1st floor lunchroom when the president's parade passed by the TSBD.
And he saw two fellow employees pass through the first floor while he was sitting there in the lunchroom eating his lunch.

Why do you insist on keeping your head tucked in where you can't see or hear the truth/

A "strong alibi"!  Even a CTer can't believe that.  I want you on the jury if I'm ever arrested for a crime.  The only evidence of Oswald having an alibi is that he said so.  His rifle is found at the crime scene with bullet casings from that rifle by the window.  His prints are on the SN boxes and rifle.  He flees the scene within minutes even after a police officer pulls a gun on him without pausing to ask what is going on.  He is identified by multiple witnesses as the murderer of a police officer that occurs a short distance and time away.  But he tells the police he was having lunch so it's all good.  HA HA HA.
« Last Edit: September 10, 2021, 02:21:32 PM by Richard Smith »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #262 on: September 10, 2021, 02:19:38 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald: No power lunch
« Reply #263 on: September 10, 2021, 03:45:02 PM »
A "strong alibi"!  Even a CTer can't believe that.  I want you on the jury if I'm ever arrested for a crime.  The only evidence of Oswald having an alibi is that he said so.  His rifle is found at the crime scene with bullet casings from that rifle by the window.  His prints are on the SN boxes and rifle.  He flees the scene within minutes even after a police officer pulls a gun on him without pausing to ask what is going on.  He is identified by multiple witnesses as the murderer of a police officer that occurs a short distance and time away.  But he tells the police he was having lunch so it's all good.  HA HA HA.

The only evidence of Oswald having an alibi is that he said so. ....and it was supported unknowingly by two of his fellow workers, Junior Jarman and Horold Norman.  They testified that they passed through the first floor shipping room and passed by the Domino room at about 12:26.   Lee said that he saw them as he sat there in the Domino room eating his lunch.