I have no problem with Oswald taking the bus, abandoning it, then getting a cab.
I believe that's how he got to the rooming house.
It's you who's struggling with Oswald's movements. I have a vague memory you believe something really wacky but I can't remember what it is, just that you didn't have the balls to openly state it and someone else had to do it for you.
The word you're looking for is "advice".
Feel free to keep any advice you're offering to yourself
You've never spoon fed me any evidence. Ever.
You never answer a direct question or deal with any issue raised that you can't explain.
What does Whaley's manifest tell you?
This is how you answer a direct question.
Looking at the above manifest, in particular entry #14, the first thing to notice is the "P" in the left hand column. This indicates the fare was a 'pick-up'. 8 of Whaley's fares that day were 'pick-ups' and 13 were 'calls'. If the passenger was Oswald fleeing the TSBD we would expect him to be a 'pick up'.
The next relevant column tells us the pick-up point was 'Greyhound'. This is a reference to the Greyhound bus station at 207 Lamar Street. Whaley was parked on Lamar close to Jackson. He spotted 'Oswald' approaching south on Lamar. This is the direction we would expect Oswald to be approaching from if he'd abandoned the bus on Elm St.
The next column tells us the destination was '500 No. Beckley', the 500 block on North Beckley Avenue (note no specific house number is given). This is the street Oswald lives on, so the fare travels from close to the TSBD to close to 1026 North Beckley. This is what we would expect if it is Oswald. That he gets dropped off past his address is easily explained as someone on the run wanting to check if anyone is waiting for him outside where he lives.
The next column reports the fare as 95 cents (incorrectly reported as 85 cents by Fritz)
The next column indicates it was a single passenger as we would expect if it was Oswald.
The next two columns record the time picked up and dropped off. It must be noted that all the figures in these two columns are estimations. This is clear by the fact all the numbers are rounded up to either 5 or 0. The 8 fares between 11:00am and 2:45pm are all given in 15 minute blocks. This tallies with Whaley's account of not using a watch and estimating his times. The best we can say is that Whaley picks up this fare somewhere between 12:30pm and 12:45pm. As we would expect if it was Oswald after abandoning the bus.
The next two columns indicate that the distance travelled was 3 miles. All the figures in these columns are also rounded up. The actual distance of the trip is 2.6 miles and takes around 7 minutes.
There is nothing in Whaley's manifest that is inconsistent with the account of Oswald catching a cab after abandoning the bus.
The question is - why would anyone want to fake the bus ride and cab ride? What's the point? Why not just fake one or the other?
And if you believe they are fake then how did he get to the rooming house?
Looking at the above manifest, in particular entry #14, the first thing to notice is the "P" in the left hand column. This indicates the fare was a 'pick-up'. 8 of Whaley's fares that day were 'pick-ups' and 13 were 'calls'. If the passenger was Oswald fleeing the TSBD we would expect him to be a 'pick up'.
The next relevant column tells us the pick-up point was 'Greyhound'. This is a reference to the Greyhound bus station at 207 Lamar Street. Whaley was parked on Lamar close to Jackson. He spotted 'Oswald' approaching south on Lamar. This is the direction we would expect Oswald to be approaching from if he'd abandoned the bus on Elm St.
The next column tells us the destination was '500 No. Beckley', the 500 block on North Beckley Avenue (note no specific house number is given). This is the street Oswald lives on, so the fare travels from close to the TSBD to close to 1026 North Beckley. This is what we would expect if it is Oswald. That he gets dropped off past his address is easily explained as someone on the run wanting to check if anyone is waiting for him outside where he lives.
The next column reports the fare as 95 cents (incorrectly reported as 85 cents by Fritz)
The next column indicates it was a single passenger as we would expect if it was Oswald.
The next two columns record the time picked up and dropped off. It must be noted that all the figures in these two columns are estimations. This is clear by the fact all the numbers are rounded up to either 5 or 0. The 8 fares between 11:00am and 2:45pm are all given in 15 minute blocks. This tallies with Whaley's account of not using a watch and estimating his times. The best we can say is that Whaley picks up this fare somewhere between 12:30pm and 12:45pm. As we would expect if it was Oswald after abandoning the bus.
The next two columns indicate that the distance travelled was 3 miles. All the figures in these columns are also rounded up. The actual distance of the trip is 2.6 miles and takes around 7 minutes.
There is nothing in Whaley's manifest that is inconsistent with the account of Oswald catching a cab after abandoning the bus.
The question is - why would anyone want to fake the bus ride and cab ride? What's the point? Why not just fake one or the other?
And if you believe they are fake then how did he get to the rooming house?Looking at the above manifest, in particular entry #14, the first thing to notice is the "P" in the left hand column. This indicates the fare was a 'pick-up'. 8 of Whaley's fares that day were 'pick-ups' and 13 were 'calls'. If the passenger was Oswald fleeing the TSBD we would expect him to be a 'pick up'.Now, that's an astute bit of reasoning!!
The next relevant column tells us the pick-up point was 'Greyhound'. This is a reference to the Greyhound bus station at 207 Lamar Street. Whaley was parked on Lamar close to Jackson. He spotted 'Oswald' approaching south on Lamar. This is the direction we would expect Oswald to be approaching from if he'd abandoned the bus on Elm St.WOW! Another brilliant observation. However you neglected to mention that Whaley said that he was at the bus depot at 12:30 and Lee Oswald was still at the TSBD at 12:30, Whaley also noticed that the man was dressed in a BLUE JACKET, and BLUE trousers, and of course Lee Oswald was NOT wearing a BLUE JACKET o r BLUE trousers. So you're flat wrong in naming Lee Oswald as that man.
The next column tells us the destination was '500 No. Beckley', the 500 block on North Beckley Avenue (note no specific house number is given). This is the street Oswald lives on, so the fare travels from close to the TSBD to close to 1026 North Beckley. This is what we would expect if it is Oswald. That he gets dropped off past his address is easily explained as someone on the run wanting to check if anyone is waiting for him outside where he lives.What an utterly absurd idea!!.....The time would have been about 12:40 ( because Whaley logged his passenger out of his taxi at 12:45. Just plain old common sense would tell a reasonable person that the police couldn't be at the rooming house just ten minutes after the shooting. This idea is actually a real hoot and belly buster. One caveat.... The police could have been at the rooming house if they had fore knowledge that Oswald was the designated patsy and he was living at 1026 N. Beckley. DO YOU BELIEVE THE POLCE HAD FORE KNOWLEDGE?
The next column reports the fare as 95 cents (incorrectly reported as 85 cents by Fritz)Fritz did not "incorrectly" report what Lee told him. There were other officers in the room and they recorded that Lee said he paid the driver of the taxi he was in, 85 cents. You know this is the truth, so why do you embarrass yourself with such a blatant lie?
The next column indicates it was a single passenger as we would expect if it was Oswald.The fact that the man was alone is somehow evidence that the man was Lee Oswald!1
The next two columns record the time picked up and dropped off. It must be noted that all the figures in these two columns are estimations. This is clear by the fact all the numbers are rounded up to either 5 or 0. The 8 fares between 11:00am and 2:45pm are all given in 15 minute blocks. This tallies with Whaley's account of not using a watch and estimating his times. The best we can say is that Whaley picks up this fare somewhere between 12:30pm and 12:45pm. As we would expect if it was Oswald after abandoning the bus.Wow! another absurd conclusion!..... Whaley's trip manifest says that he dropped his passenger at 12:45 and then drove to "station" and picked up another passenger at 1:00 pm , and he was back at Greyhound at 1:15..... He couldn't have picked up the man who was wearing a BLUE JACKET and delivered him to 500 N. Beckley much later than 12:35 , and then made it to "station" in time to pick up another passenger at 1:00pm.
The next two columns indicate that the distance travelled was 3 miles. All the figures in these columns are also rounded up. The actual distance of the trip is 2.6 miles and takes around 7 minutes.What was the elapsed time when the WC had Whaley re-enact his trip.?...
There is nothing in Whaley's manifest that is inconsistent with the account of Oswald catching a cab after abandoning the bus.At last...A reasonable and truthful statement.....EXCEPT..... Lee told the interrogators that he rode in a CITY cab and the fare was 85 cents, so he was NOT in Whaley's taxi....
