?

[Alan J. Ford]

Managed to uncover evidence confirming that the Bureau did in fact use Wollensak recording equipment in the early 60's (Page 2, paragraph 2) ---->

http://jfk.hood.edu/Collection/Weisberg%20Subject%20Index%20Files/D%20Disk/Dallas%20Police%20Broadcasts/Item%2030.pdf

IF Captain Fritz genuinely cared to record those multiple-recordings he could have easily made a request of the Bureau to use their vast resources; however, he chose to parrot back the script in front of him about not having a tape-recorder (amazing what some lying treasonous cowards will do & say for thirty pieces of silver).

So, again, the reason why those multiple interrogations are void of audio & video recording is because the entire world would have heard the plain simple Truth from the wrongly accused (as oppose to the words put into his mouth by those Framing him).

[Alan J. Ford]

The plain simple Truth:

*The wrongly-accused was standing outside on the steps of the front-entrance when the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People took place.

*12:33 Seen by a small storage-room on the first-floor by more than a few of his fellow TSBD employees returning into the building.

*12:34PM: Came to the aid of Inspector Sawyer (as no other TSBD male-employee-experience--movements/whereabouts that afternoon can account for being near that small storage-room and passenger elevators at that particular time).

*12:38PM: Upon stepping outside of the building via the front-entrance, he took a few seconds to point out where a rookie news reporter could find access to a telephone, before joining his supervisor, Mr. Shelley, down on lower Elm Street for 5-10 minutes...(thanks to Mr. Mentesana's home video capture).

Moreover, the only time the public was able to actually experience/listen & watch any audio & video recording of the wrongly-accused,  he made it crystal-clear he was innocent ---->

In addition...

It was following these exchanges with audio & video recording available for public-consumption that those framing him cleverly decided to void any further audio & video recording...choosing instead to put words into his mouth about what he said and what he did, yada, yada, yada along a hastily contrived script mired in the stench of horse manure to Frame him.   

The wrongly-accused did Not shoot anybody. Anybody.

[Alan J. Ford]

Appreciate your contribution to the discourse, Mr. Organ, however I personally don't believe the Bureau only had access to a single tape-recording machine, given how many field-offices they had all around the country. Do you have something those of reading along may reference confirming that the Bureau had only a single tape-recording machine?

Again, the reason no audio & video footage is readily available for public consumption has less to do with securing the necessary equipment for those multiple-interrogations than to void/suppress any means to display the wrongly-accused's complete innocence.

[Alan J. Ford]

Last thought today, be safe everyone as COVID-19 rears its menace again...am leaving the following link here for further review later this week...

https://www.smecc.org/wollensak_tape_recorders.htm

Given the immense popularity of this equipment even as early as circa 1950's, IF Captain Fritz genuinely wanted to record those multiple-interrogations, he could have made an appeal to the general public for use of one. Whether it's the Bureau, the general public, etc., there was no genuine effort to secure the means to create audio & video sharing during those multiple-interrogations... very telling considering the magnitude of the case being "investigated".

Audio & video sharing for public consumption was simply voided at all cost because the wrongly-accused was telling the plain simple Truth. It was much easier to Frame him by putting words into his mouth (he said this, he said that; he did this, he did that) after he drew his last breath.

Brief recap:
*The wrongly-accused did Not board Mr. McWatters' bus, let alone request a bus-transfer.
*The cab driver--with a penchant for just guessing up "evidence" proclaims he only signed what he was told he said...
*Then there's the plain simple Truth (the wrongly-accused standing outside the front-entrance on the front steps when the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People took place; being seen by more than a few TSBD employees by a small storage room on the first floor; coming to the aid of Inspector Sawyer; and, pointing out where a rookie news reporter could find a phone as he himself stepped outside the front-entrance doors into the Autumn crisp air, venturing down Elm Street towards his supervisor, and standing w/the same for 5-10 minutes (thanks to Mr. Mentesana's home video footage).

[John Mytton]

Last thought today, be safe everyone as COVID-19 rears its menace again...am leaving the following link here for further review later this week...

https://www.smecc.org/wollensak_tape_recorders.htm

Given the immense popularity of this equipment even as early as circa 1950's, IF Captain Fritz genuinely wanted to record those multiple-interrogations, he could have made an appeal to the general public for use of one. Whether it's the Bureau, the general public, etc., there was no genuine effort to secure the means to create audio & video sharing during those multiple-interrogations... very telling considering the magnitude of the case being "investigated".

Audio & video sharing for public consumption was simply voided at all cost because the wrongly-accused was telling the plain simple Truth. It was much easier to Frame him by putting words into his mouth (he said this, he said that; he did this, he did that) after he drew his last breath.

Brief recap:
*The wrongly-accused did Not board Mr. McWatters' bus, let alone request a bus-transfer.
*The cab driver--with a penchant for just guessing up "evidence" proclaims he only signed what he was told he said...
*Then there's the plain simple Truth (the wrongly-accused standing outside the front-entrance on the front steps when the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People took place; being seen by more than a few TSBD employees by a small storage room on the first floor; coming to the aid of Inspector Sawyer; and, pointing out where a rookie news reporter could find a phone as he himself stepped outside the front-entrance doors into the Autumn crisp air, venturing down Elm Street towards his supervisor, and standing w/the same for 5-10 minutes (thanks to Mr. Mentesana's home video footage).

It was much easier to Frame him by putting words into his mouth (he said this, he said that; he did this, he did that) after he drew his last breath.

Really? They could have invented absolutely anything but the best that they could come up with to incriminate Oswald was a 5 minute bus trip to nowhere? WOW!

But anyway enough of the fantasies, let's recap what we learnt from the interrogations;

Oswald denied ordering the rifle.
Oswald claimed he never owned a rifle.
Oswald claimed he only took his lunch to work.
Oswald denied that the backyard photo was him.
Oswald denied carrying a a long package to work on the 22nd.
Oswald denied putting said package on the back seat of Frazier's automobile.
Oswald lied about living at Neely street, obviously because that's where the BY photo was taken.
Oswald wouldn't spill the beans even when he was about to draw his last breath.

For someone the interrogators were trying to frame, they sure were not very good at it.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Only a true witch would deny being a witch.

[Alan J. Ford]

Didn't apply to Homicide Captains, you must have your notes mixed up:

Mr. FRITZ. I can remember the thing that I said to him and what he said to me, but I will have trouble telling you which period of questioning those questions were in because I kept no notes at the time, and these notes and things that I have made I would have to make several days later, and the questions may be in the wrong place.

An excellent point, Mr. Beck, appreciate your astute assessment.

*not to mention we aren't talking about an everyday, run of the mill usual-cases here...we are talking about the crime of the century, the cowardly ambush of a duly elected representative of the People, the highest representative of those People in a once free, open Democracy.

In a genuine investigation no stone would have been left unturned, not a single one; let alone a lame excuse about where on earth could audio & video equipment be secured...

IF those charged w/"investigating" this case wished to investigate this case, they would have quite easily realised the news reporters all around them for those several days, in tow with vast means/ access to all the audio & video equipment they needed. There's no excuse why any of those multiple interrogations were void of audio & video recordings.

Again, the reason why there is no audio & video recordings readily available for public-consumption is very telling. The wrongly-accused was simply telling the Truth (about his genuine whereabouts that afternoon). He was much easier to Frame by avoiding audio & video for public-consumption in favor of inserting words into his mouth after he drew his last breath.