Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Et tu, Bonnie?  (Read 53821 times)

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3033
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #216 on: April 13, 2021, 01:36:28 AM »
Advertisement

CE 1304 This measures 38"* as seen by way of the ruler
See larger size at https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh22/pdf/WH22_CE_1304.pdf


*A broken-down Carcano (34.8") would go into a 38" bag real good.. real damn good
 ;D

Your kind of skirting over the analysis I did of the construction of the bag.
If there's a weakness in it I'd like to know.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #216 on: April 13, 2021, 01:36:28 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #217 on: April 13, 2021, 01:38:41 AM »
Mr. BELIN. When did you get over to the southeast corner of the sixth floor?
Mr. TRULY. That I can't answer. I don't remember when I went over there. It was sometime before I learned that they had found either the rifle or the spent shell cases.


Cat got your tongue, Roy Truly?! Cannot answer or Won't answer?! Pleading the 5th?

He truly didn't remember

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3033
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #218 on: April 13, 2021, 01:41:29 AM »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #218 on: April 13, 2021, 01:41:29 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #219 on: April 13, 2021, 01:48:44 AM »
Your kind of skirting over the analysis I did of the construction of the bag.
If there's a weakness in it I'd like to know.

Tell us how you can analyze the construction of the bag without getting your hands on it.
Not that you're trying to rip the bag right out of Oswald's hands.

The little fckr killed Tippit ffs. That's the rosetta stone right there.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #220 on: April 13, 2021, 01:57:26 AM »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #220 on: April 13, 2021, 01:57:26 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3033
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #221 on: April 13, 2021, 02:04:59 AM »
Tell us how you can analyze the construction of the bag without getting your hands on it.
Not that you're trying to rip the bag right out of Oswald's hands.

It's paper and tape.
It's making a bag out of paper and tape.
It's clear, just from looking at photos, how the bag was constructed, how it was folded, where the tape was applied etc.
It's easy to grasp that whoever constructed the bag did it with a specific goal in mind.
A fundamental part of the construction of the bag are the "dimensions" of it.
I've made specific observations in my analysis about how the bag is constructed, particularly how the tape is applied. If my interpretation of these observations is a bit dodgy I'd like to have a conversation about it because, although it's a small detail it might have a larger importance.

Quote
The little fckr killed Tippit ffs. That's the rosetta stone right there.

At no point have I ever said he didn't.
There seems to be enough evidence to suggest he was some kind of desperate character on the loose with a gun in his pocket.
And it seems generally agreed he could have been in that area at the time...
He's still in the frame for Tippit's murder as far as I'm concerned.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #222 on: April 13, 2021, 02:28:33 AM »
Tony Fratini's images on the bag construction.






JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #222 on: April 13, 2021, 02:28:33 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Et tu, Bonnie?
« Reply #223 on: April 13, 2021, 02:37:37 AM »
It's paper and tape.
It's making a bag out of paper and tape.
It's clear, just from looking at photos, how the bag was constructed, how it was folded, where the tape was applied etc.
It's easy to grasp that whoever constructed the bag did it with a specific goal in mind.
A fundamental part of the construction of the bag are the "dimensions" of it.
I've made specific observations in my analysis about how the bag is constructed, particularly how the tape is applied. If my interpretation of these observations is a bit dodgy I'd like to have a conversation about it because, although it's a small detail it might have a larger importance.

At no point have I ever said he didn't.
There seems to be enough evidence to suggest he was some kind of desperate character on the loose with a gun in his pocket.
And it seems generally agreed he could have been in that area at the time...
He's still in the frame for Tippit's murder as far as I'm concerned.

Well, at least the Cuckoo's Nest window itself 'framed' Oswald in a sense

In the meantime, lets see you get your hands-off technique past a jury