Forward And Back And To The Left

[Dan O'meara]

My only question is if it’s reasonably probable that 6.5 ball nosed MC bullet  will shatter up to 9 pieces when striking a human skull at nearly tangential to the upper curve area of the rear skull,  at range of 90 yds and 2000 ft/sec velocity approx.

Really good question. In the opening clip below we see the initial movement JFK's head is forward. We also see the top of his head exploding upwards leaving a large 'crater' where the top of his head was. Part of the scalp, ripped from the top of his head, hangs down by the side of his head:





The destruction to the top of JFK's head is confirmed by the Mytton Gif:



So, can a single bullet cause such devastation? At first I didn't believe so but after reading chapter 16 of the Pat Speer website (http://www.patspeer.com/), I became convinced it could.

[Steve M. Galbraith]

It's hardly surprising no-one, especially the Tinfoil Brigade, wants to touch this as the initial head movement at the moment of impact is forward and can only reasonably be explained by a shot from behind.
Just as important is the fact there is no "blowout" at the back of JFK's head shown in the Z-film but this is brushed off as an alteration to the film as if this was no big deal, as if there was plenty of time to make such a sophisticated alteration. There was no alteration to the film.
This Gif, created by John Mytton I believe, also demonstrates there was no blowout at the back of the head:



Of course, all the autopsy photos/x-rays were faked as well.
Try to imagine the thousands of papers, articles, books etc., written specifically to demonstrate this fakery.
It is my contention that all this wasted effort has emanated from a misunderstanding of the "back and to the left" motion.

Yes. You've aptly summarized what is being proposed.

Look again at the clip. There is no exit wound coming out of the back of JFK's head. None. There is no blood or brain matter exiting backwards. The back of his head is intact. As is shown in the x-rays and autopsy photos. It's why they order autopsies and don't rely on eyewitness accounts.

The witnesses who say they saw a exit wound in the back were simply wrong about its location.

[Dan O'meara]

Yes. You've aptly summarized what is being proposed.

Look again at the clip. There is no exit wound coming out of the back of JFK's head. None. There is no blood or brain matter exiting backwards. The back of his head is intact. As is shown in the x-rays and autopsy photos. It's why they order autopsies and don't rely on eyewitness accounts.

The witnesses who say they saw a exit wound in the back were simply wrong about its location.

The "back and to the left" (B2L) motion in the clip above has been one of the main contributors to the "shot from the front" school of thought which in turn has led to the "blowout at the back of the head" school of thought, which, because it is not shown in the Z-film or autopsy photos, has led to the "all the evidence is fake" school of thought.
IMO the B2L motion is at the heart of the majority of most conspiracy thinking.
Understanding what is actually happening at the moment of the headshot is of the utmost importance.
BTW, just because I believe the B2L motion is a result from a shot from behind, it doesn't mean I believe there is no conspiracy or that Oswald took the shots. I just think it has caused an ocean of confusion.