Then went inside with the curtain rods

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Then went inside with the curtain rods  (Read 366931 times)

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #399 on: February 09, 2021, 07:56:37 PM »
Stop being so desperate for attention.

Would you like some fries with that nothingburger? Stop dodging. And stop trying to pass off this forum as a court of law.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2021, 07:57:47 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #400 on: February 10, 2021, 12:23:19 AM »
How can they have the same exhibit number but be different curtain rods?

Who says the numbers 275 & 276 on the Crime Scene Search Section sheet, which records the submission of two curtain rods 3/15/64, are exhibit numbers?

And feel free to explain to us how exactly the exhibit numbers 275 and 276 came to be assigned to the other two curtain rods, i.e. those extracted on-the-record from the Paine garage 3/23/64. How exactly were those two numbers arrived at, Mr Smith? Go on, tell us, it's a hoot!

 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: February 10, 2021, 12:24:50 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8212
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #401 on: February 10, 2021, 02:54:22 AM »
Would you like some fries with that nothingburger? Stop dodging. And stop trying to pass off this forum as a court of law.

Stop being so desperate for attention.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #402 on: February 10, 2021, 06:08:14 AM »
Stop being so desperate for attention.

Stop pretending that this forum is a court of law.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2021, 06:09:17 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #403 on: February 10, 2021, 08:49:02 PM »
As usual you can't follow along.  That is the bag your contrarian brother suggests is just ordinary "paper for wrapping books." 

Are you suggesting that the paper that CE142 was made from was something other than paper from the wrapping table that was used to wrap books?  If so, that would be news to everybody.

Quote
Wow.  It is a singular bag.  It is found next to the SN.

Sure, and you have a photo with a dotted outline of a bag drawn on to prove it.   :D

Quote
  It has Oswald's prints on it.

And you have some evidence that this wrapping paper was taped into a "bag" prior to these alleged prints being placed on it?  Let's hear it.

Quote
It is absurd to suggest that this bag was used for any purpose except to carry the rifle.

It is absurd to claim with ZERO evidence that a rifle was ever carried in it.
« Last Edit: February 10, 2021, 09:20:08 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #404 on: February 10, 2021, 08:51:12 PM »
Crist, the lengths these people will go to to defend Oswald is endless. There is no absurdity they won't use to defend another absurdity.

No "lengths" are necessary.  You can either demonstrate that Oswald carried a rifle into the TSBD or you cannot.

And you cannot.

Nobody cares about your Lincoln false equivalence.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Then went inside with the curtain rods
« Reply #405 on: February 10, 2021, 08:52:26 PM »
In the form of good-natured insights. Clever, cut-to-the-quick insights I might add.

Wow, your delusions know no end.