A weak reply.
A strong reply would explain how your comments were "NOT immaterial". In other words: material.
My comments speak for themselves and there is nothing I could tell you that you would be prepared to accept. My replies will always be weak to you and you will always try to tell me what you would like to hear as a "strong" reply.
I am not about to waste my time with you again. Been there, done that...
If you want to ignore that Markham said she took her daily bus at 1.15, which means she couldn't have been at 10th street to see a shooting at that time, then ignore it...
If you want to ignore the obvious problem with the chain of custody for the revolver, then ignore it
And if you want to ignore the stupidity of Richard Smith's comment about witnesses and my example that showed just how wrong and stupid it was, then ignore it...
It all just confirms my earlier comment,
It never ceases to amaze how much factual evidence LNs are willing to overlook to keep Oswald in play as the lone gunman.
But who knows, perhaps for you ignorance and the continuation thereof is indeed bliss...