On The Trail Of Delusion

[Bill Chapman]

That makes no sense unless you're implying that Oswald knew in advance that he would be killed before having his day in court (which allowed the US government to convict him in the court of public opinion without a real trial).

Assuming that he didn't know that Jack Ruby was going to kill him, we can't assume that he had any idea how "history" would view him.

At the time of his death, maybe he believed that he could beat the charges. That's the only reasonable explanation for his denial of responsibility (assuming he was guilty).


It's only relevant if Oswald expressed anger towards JFK or a dislike of his policies, which he NEVER did despite the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis.

In fact, Oswald told several people including Marina that he liked JFK and supported his policies on Civil Rights. In other words, there's no indication that Oswald's expressions of Marxist beliefs had anything to do with JFK.

I find it more plausible that the photos were related to Oswald's hatred of General Edwin Walker but that's just speculative and based on the "Hunter of Fascists" caption that was found on George DeMorenschildt's copy of the BYP. 


I accept the authenticity of the photos. I question "who" took them if not Marina, who has given sketchy and inconsistent testimony on the photos.

Beyond that, there's nothing incriminating about the photos. It only becomes incriminating when associated with someone accused of a violent crime.

'It's only relevant if Oswald expressed anger towards JFK or a dislike of his policies, which he NEVER did despite the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis. In fact, Oswald told several people including Marina that he liked JFK and supported his policies on Civil Rights. In other words, there's no indication that Oswald's expressions of Marxist beliefs had anything to do with JFK'.
_Good plan on Oswalds part: Sing the praises of Kennedy to everyone within earshot
_Except he had no plan at all beyond a last minute-epiphany
_Fck the politics: At that window, every man for himself.

[Jon Banks]

'It's only relevant if Oswald expressed anger towards JFK or a dislike of his policies, which he NEVER did despite the Bay of Pigs and Cuban Missile Crisis. In fact, Oswald told several people including Marina that he liked JFK and supported his policies on Civil Rights. In other words, there's no indication that Oswald's expressions of Marxist beliefs had anything to do with JFK'.
_Good plan on Oswalds part: Sing the praises of Kennedy to everyone within earshot
_Except he had no plan at all beyond a last minute-epiphany
_Fck the politics: At that window, every man for himself.

Plan?

I thought LN'ers believe the Kennedy assassination was a crime of opportunity?

If that's true, how could Oswald saying nice things about JFK years and months before 11/22/63 have been part of a plan? What plan?

[Bill Chapman]

Plan?

I thought LN'ers believe the Kennedy assassination was a crime of opportunity?

If that's true, how could Oswald saying nice things about JFK years and months before 11/22/63 have been part of a plan? What plan?

Where did I conclude he had a plan
Now read past the the first line

_Good plan on Oswalds part: Sing the praises of Kennedy to everyone within earshot
_Except he had no plan at all beyond a last minute-epiphany
_Fck the politics: At that window, every man for himself.

[Bill Chapman]

Uh-oh, another rookie mistake by our "artistic genius"!

 

=====
ALMOST
GENIUS
OTTO the
CLOWN

=====


billchapman_hunter of trolls

[Bill Chapman]

Um, them two new lines just made things worse.

Took "retarded" to the next level.

 

Those two lines were in the original post

[Bill Chapman]

No, get a grip.

Let go, Chapman!

 

You're the one needing to 'get a grip', say, on where that thumb should be positioned, for instance'

[Bill Chapman]

Not the lines I quoted.

You just doubled down on your own stupidity.

 

You didn't quote any lines.
Keep hiding by being evasive on everything you post
You are not important here

Oh, btw.. Jon completely skirted my actual conclusion by ignoring my actual conclusion: