Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?  (Read 13327 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #96 on: October 16, 2020, 12:31:15 AM »
Advertisement
People are saying...

How Donald Trumpian of you...

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #96 on: October 16, 2020, 12:31:15 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #97 on: October 16, 2020, 04:19:25 PM »
How Donald Trumpian of you...

Congratulations on noticing the borrowed sarcasm..

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #98 on: October 20, 2020, 11:45:55 PM »
The question again?---    A difficult question as one would have to be really super clairvoyant to decipher such primordial motivations.
If a what?....some blunder? was impossible? Why impossible?
That question threw me David. I am still looking at that 24 hour claim stuff...because I have never heard it before. What paperwork reveals that?
Also....I never understood the logic of ordering a firearm using an alias that could be directly linked back to Oswald...That never made any sense.

It makes sense if you know that the rifle was purchased as a throw down rifle at General Walker's.   Lee and George wanted the rifle to be found by the police after the hoax "attempt" to shoot Walker.   But they didn't want it found until Lee was out of the country and on his way to Cuba.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #98 on: October 20, 2020, 11:45:55 PM »


Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #99 on: October 21, 2020, 03:33:36 AM »
It makes sense if you know that the rifle was purchased as a throw down rifle at General Walker's.   Lee and George wanted the rifle to be found by the police after the hoax "attempt" to shoot Walker.   But they didn't want it found until Lee was out of the country and on his way to Cuba.

Then why didn't Oswald "throw down (the) rifle" instead of burying it? The rifle wasn't found by the police after the Walker shooting!! Your post makes absolutely no sense.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #100 on: October 21, 2020, 04:03:57 PM »
Then why didn't Oswald "throw down (the) rifle" instead of burying it? The rifle wasn't found by the police after the Walker shooting!! Your post makes absolutely no sense.

Burying it??.... hiding it Beneath a pile of brush is NOT "burying it"....Ya dumb ass.  Do you think that Lee was carrying a shovel when he left the rifle in hope that the police dogs would find it?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #100 on: October 21, 2020, 04:03:57 PM »


Offline Denis Pointing

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #101 on: October 21, 2020, 08:18:08 PM »
Burying it??.... hiding it Beneath a pile of brush is NOT "burying it"....Ya dumb ass.  Do you think that Lee was carrying a shovel when he left the rifle in hope that the police dogs would find it?

And it's not throwing the rifle down so the police could easily find it either, is it sh** for brains? And how do you suppose "the police dogs would find it" if they had not previously smelled it...ESP perhaps? lol  Yet another post that makes no sense, you ignorant, useless old fool.

"Marina Oswald stated that when
she asked her husband what be had done with the rifle, he replied
that he had buried it in the ground or hidden it in some bushes
and that he also mentioned a railroad track in this connection.
She testified that several days later Oswald recovered his rifle
and brought it back to their apartment."

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #102 on: October 21, 2020, 09:19:27 PM »
And it's not throwing the rifle down so the police could easily find it either, is it sh** for brains? And how do you suppose "the police dogs would find it" if they had not previously smelled it...ESP perhaps? lol  Yet another post that makes no sense, you ignorant, useless old fool.

"Marina Oswald stated that when
she asked her husband what be had done with the rifle, he replied
that he had buried it in the ground or hidden it in some bushes
and that he also mentioned a railroad track in this connection.
She testified that several days later Oswald recovered his rifle
and brought it back to their apartment."


Marina thought ( speculated) that....Lee had "buried it in the ground .... OR ....HIDDEN IT IN SOME BUSHES"

He obviously didn't bury it in the ground....He had no shovel .....   Do you understand that? Dim Bulb?
« Last Edit: October 21, 2020, 09:24:46 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #102 on: October 21, 2020, 09:19:27 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?
« Reply #103 on: October 21, 2020, 09:33:12 PM »
It makes sense if you know that the rifle was purchased as a throw down rifle at General Walker's.   Lee and George wanted the rifle to be found by the police after the hoax "attempt" to shoot Walker.   But they didn't want it found until Lee was out of the country and on his way to Cuba.

It makes sense if you know that Walt fabricated a story that the rifle was purchased as a throw down rifle at General Walker's.

There, I fixed it for you.