Is Jim DiEugenio correct about Oswalds rifle?

[Bill Chapman]

Your baseless assumptions don't determine who is somebody's "hero", or who used aliases.

No assumptions needed
You're still kneeling

[John Iacoletti]

No assumptions needed
You're still kneeling

yes, and you don't think your interpretation of that is a baseless assumption?

[John Tonkovich]

Forget about extolling you vast knowledge .....That has No direct bearing on the coup d etat

You seem to be avoiding my question about Alba and McKeown, Mr Cakebread.
Please enlighten me as to my errors.

[Bill Chapman]

yes, and you don't think your interpretation of that is a baseless assumption?

No. The aliases, for instance, exist as longtime points of controversy and are therefore valid as proof-of-concept candidates. And taking a knee at his grave smacks of genuflection, fealty... a veritable homage, as I see it.

[John Tonkovich]

No. The aliases, for instance, exist as longtime points of controversy and are therefore valid as proof-of-concept candidates. And taking a knee at his grave smacks of genuflection, fealty... a veritable homage, as I see it.

Mr I, how long has Mr Chapman been repeating this foolishness? Months, years?
His argument is a textbook case of ad hominem.

[John Iacoletti]

No. The aliases, for instance, exist as longtime points of controversy and are therefore valid as proof-of-concept candidates.

The aliases exist. You just cannot show that Oswald ever used them as aliases for himself.

And taking a knee at his grave smacks of genuflection, fealty... a veritable homage, as I see it.

And how does how you see things have the slightest bit of relevance? Do you see NFL football players as genuflecting and paying homage to the flag and country then?

And even if I was paying homage, so what? Is that bad just because you think he killed people?

[Bill Chapman]

The aliases exist. You just cannot show that Oswald ever used them as aliases for himself.
So what? I give the aliases top marks on the feasibility chart.

And how does how you see things have the slightest bit of relevance?
You sure spend a lot of time reading my 'irrelevancies'.

Do you see NFL football players as genuflecting and paying homage to the flag and country then?
Not Freakin' Likely

And even if I was paying homage, so what? Is that bad just because you think he killed people?
Where did I say it was bad? On the contrary, it's the gift that keeps on giving.

[John Iacoletti]

The aliases exist. You just cannot show that Oswald ever used them as aliases for himself.
So what? I give the aliases top marks on the feasibility chart.

What you think is feasible is not only irrelevant, it's not even interesting.

Do you see NFL football players as genuflecting and paying homage to the flag and country then?
Not Freakin' Likely

But the question is, is it "feasible"?

And even if I was paying homage, so what? Is that bad just because you think he killed people?
Where did I say it was bad? On the contrary, it's the gift that keeps on giving.

Back to to the incoherent rambling.  It's a "gift", but you can't articulate why it's so notable.