The HSCA Investigation: A Major Step Forward in the JFK Case

[John Iacoletti]

Mr Mytton would get along well with Dale Myers.
As they say on the streets, " Game recognize game".

 

They’re both graphical con artists. At least Myers doesn’t hide behind a false identity.

[John Mytton]

Mr Mytton would get along well with Dale Myers.

 

You got that right and we'd talk about his awesome 3D recreation of the Single Bullet Fact and I'd really enjoy discussing his in depth analysis of his book "With Malice: Lee Harvey Oswald and the Murder of Officer J.D. Tippit", where Dale proved beyond all doubt that Oswald killed Tippit!

https://www.jfkfiles.com/

https://www.amazon.com.au/Malice-Harvey-Oswald-Murder-Officer-ebook/dp/B00GDTYR3S

JohnM

[John Tonkovich]

Nice 3D work Jerry which perfectly reinforces my GIF and it's nice to have someone else around here who understands image analysis, because laymen like Tonkovich, Griffith and Iacoletti who make silly illogical amateur observations only succeed in embarrassing themselves.

JohnM

Are you an expert in photographic analysis?
Please inform us re: your credentials?
Thx.

[Larry Chambliss]

Weren't silencers used by "hit men" of that generation?

[Michael T. Griffith]

To  understand the HSCA, you must understand that the HSCA consisted of several panels and teams, such as one panel for the medical evidence, one panel for the photographic evidence, one panel for the firearms evidence, a team for the Oswald-Mexico City evidence, a team for the organized crime evidence, etc., etc.

The forensic pathology panel was a sad joke

The photographic evidence panel was not much better, although the PEP did acknowledge the photographic evidence that someone was moving boxes in the sixth-floor window less than two minutes after the shooting--obviously, this could not have been Oswald.

The organized crime team did a great job, absolutely outstanding work. They destroyed the WC's portrait of Jack Ruby and the commission's myths about Ruby's shooting of Oswald.

The Oswald-Mexico City team did a fantastic job. They found clear evidence that someone was impersonating Oswald in Mexico City.

The HSCA's review of Jack Ruby's polygraph was crucial because it showed the the FBI examiner rigged to help Ruby to avoid failing the test but that even then the test contained indications that Ruby lied.

The HSCA's acoustical guys were superb and discovered scientific evidence that at least four shots were fired during the assassination.

In most cases, the panel chairman/team lead greatly influenced how well the panel/team did. Baden was a train wreck as FPP chairman.

[John Tonkovich]

To  understand the HSCA, you must understand that the HSCA consisted of several panels and teams, such as one panel for the medical evidence, one panel for the photographic evidence, one panel for the firearms evidence, a team for the Oswald-Mexico City evidence, a team for the organized crime evidence, etc., etc.

The forensic pathology panel was a sad joke

The photographic evidence panel was not much better, although the PEP did acknowledge the photographic evidence that someone was moving boxes in the sixth-floor window less than two minutes after the shooting--obviously, this could not have been Oswald.

The organized crime team did a great job, absolutely outstanding work. They destroyed the WC's portrait of Jack Ruby and the commission's myths about Ruby's shooting of Oswald.

The Oswald-Mexico City team did a fantastic job. They found clear evidence that someone was impersonating Oswald in Mexico City.

The HSCA's review of Jack Ruby's polygraph was crucial because it showed the the FBI examiner rigged to help Ruby to avoid failing the test but that even then the test contained indications that Ruby lied.

The HSCA's acoustical guys were superb and discovered scientific evidence that at least four shots were fired during the assassination.

In most cases, the panel chairman/team lead greatly influenced how well the panel/team did. Baden was a train wreck as FPP chairman.

Well, considering Blakey wrote the RICO statute in 1970, you are surprised he focused on organized crime in his conclusions, and blindly trusted the CIA? You are aware Blakey admits Joannides lied to him,and obstructed justice?

[Michael T. Griffith]

Well, considering Blakey wrote the RICO statute in 1970, you are surprised he focused on organized crime in his conclusions, and blindly trusted the CIA? You are aware Blakey admits Joannides lied to him, and obstructed justice?

The more I have studied the HSCA, the more I have come to view Blakey in a more positive light. Blakey did many things that I still find inexcusable. Yet, Blakey let Ed Lopez and Don Hardway conduct a no-holes-barred investigation into Oswald's visit to Mexico City, and they uncovered compelling evidence that someone was impersonating Oswald there.

When Blakey heard back from BBN that the DPD dictabelt had at least four gunshot impulses on it, he ordered follow-up research, and then forced a massive rewrite of the HSCA report when Weiss and Aschkenasy confirmed BBN's findings.

Blakey gathered up the nerve to acknowledge that Silvia Odio's account was solid, and he ensured that the HSCA report contained an excellent section on her story, whereas the WC dismissed her account, saying it was "almost certain" that Odio was wrong.

Some of the HSCA skullduggery that critics attack was most likely done without Blakey's knowledge or consent, such as the HSCA FPP's misrepresentation of the testimony of the autopsy witnesses regarding the large head wound as being in agreement with the autopsy report and in disagreement with the Dallas testimony, when in fact we learned when the ARRB released most of the sealed HSCA files that nearly everyone at the autopsy said the large wound was in the back of the head, just as the Dallas doctors and nurses said it was.