Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Dan O'meara]

The quotes were not posted correctly then. Also, there were no links to follow the [not very useful] information.
Even so... you appear to agree that an opposing viewpoint is from "rabid individuals who have no life experience".

Is that a fact Jerry.

Just so we're clear, I don't think Oswald took the shots.
The subsequent investigation was profoundly incompetent and it is difficult to tell where the incompetence ends and the corruption starts.
And the WC hearings were a farce.

I hold an "opposing viewpoint" but give me an LNer over a CTer every time.

[Dan O'meara]

Not "jacket".

Jacket.

No wonder you're so all over the place, also on the forum, currently.

The reason I put "jacket" is because I don't think it was a jacket.
I think it was CE 151

[Walt Cakebread]

"...he took a cab wearing a blue jacket..."

You've been listening to Walt too much.
He described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.
He could be saying the jacket was also a very light colour and made of a khaki material.
If so, you're example scans as - wore a light grey jacket to work, got a cab wearing a light coloured jacket, went home and changed into a light grey jacket.
Mind blowing.

You've been listening to Walt too much.
He described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.

Bull sh--!.....
He  (Whaley) described his passenger's ( who was NOT LHO ) clothing as BLUE trousers and a BLUE jacket  that made up a UNIFORM.    Uniforms usually have matching Jacket and trousers.   Think of a policeman's uniform.

AND what's more Lee Oswald was NOT wearing a Jacket .  Why do you persist in attempting to morph Whaleys passenger into Lee Oswald.    Are you really this confused ?....


described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.

[Dan O'meara]

You've been listening to Walt too much.
He described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.

Bull sh--!.....
He  (Whaley) described his passenger's ( who was NOT LHO ) clothing as BLUE trousers and a BLUE jacket  that made up a UNIFORM.    Uniforms usually have matching Jacket and trousers.   Think of a policeman's uniform.

Bullsh*t to you too.
Whaley only describes the pants as faded blue and made of a khaki material. That's a fact.
He describes the jacket as being similar to the pants. That's a fact
If the jacket was the same as the pants, as in a uniform, he wouldn't have used the word "similar", he would have said it was the same.
Whaley does not describe a blue jacket. That's a fact
(and remember...you like to deal with facts)

AND what's more Lee Oswald was NOT wearing a Jacket .  Why do you persist in attempting to morph Whaleys passenger into Lee Oswald.    Are you really this confused ?....

It hurts to be labeled "confused" by you Walt

(I know I shouldn't have to point out the inherent irony in the above statement but I feel I must)

described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.

Erm...I'm sure you've added this for some good reason.

[Jerry Freeman]

"...he took a cab wearing a blue jacket..."

You've been listening to Walt too much.
He described light blue pants made of a khaki material and a similar jacket.
He could be saying the jacket was also a very light colour and made of a khaki material. *Mind blowing.

And you are waffling too much. Similar means very much like in appearance does it not? Regardless whether this supposed [taxi] jacket was blue, grey, or pink with yellow polka dots, the cab driver testified that his passenger wore one did he not? "Oswald" the bus passenger didn't [according to those witnesses]   
          *BTW-- small minds are easily blown so be careful.

[Alan Ford]

Wherever did they get this idea from?


The idea probably came from Baker who told the Oswald stand in ( John J. Howlett ) that " Lee Harvey Oswald was sitting at the table drinking a coke, when I opened the lunchroom door"

Possible. It would of course mean that

a) his 11/22 affidavit describes an encounter with a man other than Mr Oswald on a higher floor
b) he lied his backside off to the Warren Commission

It would also raise the hardly trivial question: Why on earth would Officer Baker have felt it necessary to check out the lunchroom in the first place?

 

[Walt Cakebread]

Bullsh*t to you too.
Whaley only describes the pants as faded blue and made of a khaki material. That's a fact.
He describes the jacket as being similar to the pants. That's a fact
If the jacket was the same as the pants, as in a uniform, he wouldn't have used the word "similar", he would have said it was the same.
Whaley does not describe a blue jacket. That's a fact
(and remember...you like to deal with facts)

It hurts to be labeled "confused" by you Walt

(I know I shouldn't have to point out the inherent irony in the above statement but I feel I must)

Erm...I'm sure you've added this for some good reason.

I'm sorry, Dan Ol Man....   But When you persist in trying to place Lee Oswald in Whaley's cab in spite of the evidence that reveals Lee could not have been Whaley's passenger I can only assume that you are confused.
It hurts to be labeled "confused" by you Walt

[Walt Cakebread]

So the jacket is now a "jacket" because it's actually CE 151.... LOL

You fail again because Whaley already dealt with the shirt, claiming it was CE 150, so Oswald is now wearing two long sleeved shirts!

Awesome watching an LN suicide mission real time.

 Oswald is now wearing two long sleeved shirts!

Yes, and in addition to that Whaley actually testified that his passenger was wearing TWO jackets......  Had there been a defense attorney.... The case would have ended at that point....   Talk about insane and absurd testimony!!