Yep, Mr O'Blazney is an emotional guy. He wrote this a couple of years back:
"and what, pray tell, mssr. 'prayerdude', explains your cognitive dissonance? anybody but oswald. i remember having a nice chat with mssr. bugliosi back in the day. that, and other conversations changed my mind, for i was almost like you. and then there was leo damore, whose book deprived ted kennedy of his mantle as president. and before that, lane and garrison, et. al. they polluted the minds of millions...... MILLIONS !!! mae didn't help, either. nor did sarah mcclendon, whose wheelchair i used to push into the white house for press conferences (they don't have press conferences anymore.....sigh+), passing notes to tim mccury from her. oh, those were the days !!. everything changed when W was illegally named 'the chief'. they wouldn't let me in then after that numbskull was erected, as i had an FBI file, et. al., but she bellowed "the president shall hear of this !!"....... then they let me in. did you know she was responsible for an 11 million-dollar makeover in order to have handicapped people accessible into the white house? (read: americans with disabilities act)"
"An emotional guy?" Look in a mirror. You wet yourself over curtain rods and you're at it again in this thread.
I don't waste my time with anyone who even hints of duplicity or dishonesty. Mark O'Blazney is your mirror opposite. Try asking Mark a sincere, serious question, he has nothing to hide and is always willing to help other sincere posters. He is cynical and sarcastic, having been exposed to both Leo Damore and to Peter Janney! He knows more about Washington DC of the past sixty years than anyone else I've noticed and he never takes himself too seriously. You, OTOH ..... ?
There are two kinds of personalities participating in assassination studies, those you can trust and those you cannot. You do what you are attempting to do here to Mark O'Blazney and it is your reputation you are displaying, not his.
O'Blazney or Janney, sincerity or snake oil. Take your pick.
Remember author Janney? This was his BS...
https://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/07/peter-janney/the-autodaf-of-lisa-pease-and-jamesdieugenio-tomas-de-torquemada-and-the-spanish-inquisition-return-in-a-new-era-of-suppression-of-freedom-of-thought-and-adherence-to-a-rigid-dogma-namely-thei/
The Autodaf of Lisa Pease and James DiEugenio Tomas de Torquemada and the Spanish Inquisition return in a new era of suppression of freedom of thought and adherence to a rigid dogma - namely their own prejudices!
By Peter Janney
July 6, 2012
....In addition, Ms. Pease can't even seem to fathom or consider how "Lt. William L. Mitchell," a man who told police he was jogging on the towpath when he passed Mary Meyer — allegedly just before the murder took place — told police that a "Negro male" matching Wiggins' description was following her in an effort to frame Ray Crump. "Mitchell" would then testify against Crump at the murder trial nine months later in July 1965 as part of the CIA's assassination operation. It doesn't seem to matter to Pease that "Mitchell" has never been able to be located since the trial, or that his known address during that time was documented as a "CIA safe house" by three separate former CIA employees. At the time of trial in July 1965, Mitchell told a reporter that he had since retired from the military and was now a mathematics instructor at Georgetown University — yet no record of his employment there could ever be located, nor was there ever any bona-fide military service record located for "Mitchell," either in the Pentagon where he was listed in the directory at the time of the murder, or in the main military data base in St. Louis. This was thoroughly researched by the Peabody Award-winning journalist Roger Charles, as discussed in my book, a fact that Pease fails to mention in one of her many deliberate omissions, which also included Damore's consultation with L. Fletcher Prouty (as documented by Damore's attorney James H. Smith) to finally understand who "Mitchell" was, before Damore confronted him. Of course, Lisa Pease is entitled to whatever flawed point of view she wants to embrace, but she's not entitled to her own set of facts.
The rest of Pease's long-winded misstatements criticizing author Leo Damore, Timothy Leary, Robert Morrow, Gregory Douglas and other sources who I attempted to unravel — explicitly noting their deficiencies and limitations — completely obfuscates the clarity of the emerging picture: Placed in a larger context, and juxtaposed with firm documentation, the aggregate unfolding scenario clearly indicates that Mary Meyer's life was ended by a CIA assassination. But in the Pease-DiEugenio fantasy world, people are either all white or all black, complete truth-tellers or liars, completely reliable or unreliable. There are no shades of grey; there is no ambiguity; and there is no room for the analysis of intricacy and complexity....
