Then went outside to watch P. parade ( Parts 1 & 2 )

[Dan O'meara]

I have yet to see a compelling argument for Oswald's involvement in the assassination.  Just a bunch of conjecture and handwaving.

Oswald's palm print found on a rifle hid on the 6th floor, the very floor multiple witnesses state shots were fired from (Williams and co.).
That isn't a compelling argument Oswald was involved?
Or is it a compelling argument Oswald was set up?
Or does it mean nothing?

[Alan Ford]

If he was always going to be the Patsy, those running the show couldn't have him just running around

Why assume Mr Oswald was being set up as the sixth floor shooter? If he wasn't, then it didn't much matter where he was going to be at the time of the shooting! 

[Alan Ford]

Yes Mr Ford, let's cut to the chase.
I think Oswald needs an alibi because I think he's involved in the assassination.

Well, you think Mr Bonnie Ray Williams and Mr Jack Dougherty are also involved in the assassination. Did they need a fake alibi too?

Do you think he's involved or not?
 

I think he was framed for involvement, though I cannot altogether rule out his having been a knowing participant.

Now your turn, Mr O'Meara: Where do you think Mr Oswald was at the time of the shooting?

 

[Alan Ford]

Oswald's palm print found on a rifle hid on the 6th floor, the very floor multiple witnesses state shots were fired from (Williams and co.).

"Williams and co."? But you've been telling us Mr Williams was in on the conspiracy. Now he's a credible witness against Mr Oswald? 

[Martin Weidmann]

Oswald's palm print found on a rifle hid on the 6th floor, the very floor multiple witnesses state shots were fired from (Williams and co.).
That isn't a compelling argument Oswald was involved?
Or is it a compelling argument Oswald was set up?
Or does it mean nothing?

Lt Day claims that he found a palm print on the rifle on Friday evening. The FBI, who examined the rifle within 24 hours after to murder, could find no trace of any kind of print on the rifle, so if Day had lifted a print, it would have been a 100% perfect lift, eliminating any possible remanence, which is highly unusual. Day didn't produce the palm print on an evidence card until November 26, thus reducing it's evidentary value to next to nothing.

So, no, it isn't a compelling argument that Oswald was involved.

[Jack Nessan]

He was going down to the first floor, to check out the "commotion" downstairs.

Now you're getting it... and to go downstairs (meaning outside) he had to leave the building at the front door and go down the stairs.

He either encountered Baker and Truly on the second floor as they state or the first floor as LHO stated.

Oswald never stated that. According to Holmes he said he encountered Baker and Truly near the frontdoors on the second floor.

Either way according to his account he was descending from an even a higher floor

Well, ain't that a shame... You were doing so well, and now you've gone and spoil it. There is nothing in Oswald's (or rather Holmes') account that confirms he was descending from a higher floor.

LHO makes the same reference to encountering Truly and Baker as do Truly and Baker. Just a different location but he was definitely in the building during the assassination.

Wow, you've cracked the case.... You are right, Oswald was indeed guilty of being inside the building during the assassination.

Weidmann: "Wow, you've cracked the case.... You are right, Oswald was indeed guilty of being inside the building during the assassination. "


Congratulations, this is a first Martin. Usually you are off in a fantasy world making up your own times, witness statements, etc., but this time you are right LHO was in the building during the assassination. The interesting part is your posts show every indication that you weren't even tracking the discussion. You must feel very strongly about LHO not being Prayer Man.

[Martin Weidmann]

Weidmann: "Wow, you've cracked the case.... You are right, Oswald was indeed guilty of being inside the building during the assassination. "


Congratulations, this is a first Martin. Usually you are off in a fantasy world making up your own times, witness statements, etc., but this time you are right LHO was in the building during the assassination. The interesting part is your posts show every indication that you weren't even tracking the discussion. You must feel very strongly about LHO not being Prayer Man.

The sarcasm of my remark went straight over your head, didn't it?

Btw, do you need reminding that the encounter with Baker and Truly (near the front door) took place after and not during the assassination?


Usually you are off in a fantasy world making up your own times, witness statements,

Show me one time where I made up my own times (whatever that means) or a witness statement! I bet know you can't.

You must feel very strongly about LHO not being Prayer Man.

Just a strongly as I feel for everything there isn't credible or sufficient evidence for, like - for instance - Oswald being any higher than on the 2nd floor when the shots were fired.

I'm not exactly sure what you hope to achieve by these "drive-by" posts, but I do understand why you are doing it. It's far easier to do, and maybe score some minor point to satisfy your ego, than have a proper discussion based on facts and evidence, isn't it?