Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Fragments  (Read 10831 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Fragments
« Reply #104 on: July 16, 2020, 11:35:45 PM »
Advertisement
I'm sure he will find your assessment absolutely devastating.

 :D

Iacoletti,

As most of us find your "rebuttals" on this forum.

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: July 16, 2020, 11:45:03 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Fragments
« Reply #104 on: July 16, 2020, 11:35:45 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Fragments
« Reply #105 on: July 17, 2020, 01:56:42 AM »
I'm sure he will find your assessment absolutely devastating.

 :D

Still dodging, I see. Naughty, naughty. Now, would you like some fries with your latest nothing-burger?

And no need to attempt a devastation. It's more fun watching a CT self-destruction aided by a quick, easy demonstration and readily available to all comers for their own hands-on study.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2020, 03:41:15 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Fragments
« Reply #106 on: July 17, 2020, 04:29:50 AM »
'Unless, of course, he was in the process of loosening his tie, or something'
Difficult, since there was a piece missing  ;)

Thomas, I opened the original vid in QuickTime 10 on my iMac desktop. Note the timeline bar which appears. Using my cursor while selecting the small vertical bar, I was able to toggle the video back-and-forth from slo-mo to medium to high speed and everywhere in between.

My conclusion: Martin Hinrichs is a naughty boy.



I suggest that interested parties try this for themselves..

I recall reading somewhere that Martin Hinrichs disowned that. He no longer believes that it shows Kennedy being hit in the back.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Fragments
« Reply #106 on: July 17, 2020, 04:29:50 AM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Fragments
« Reply #107 on: July 17, 2020, 05:04:16 AM »
I recall reading somewhere that Martin Hinrichs disowned that. He no longer believes that it shows Kennedy being hit in the back.

Thanks, Tim.

I guess you're saying the dirty rascal manipulated the version he posted to make it look as though JFK started lurching forward at Z228, and therefore JFK and Connally must have been hit by two different bullets fired almost simultaneously, or something like that.

I wish the Zapruder footage on the Internet was clearer so we could see whether or not John Connally is looking sharply to his right at Z133-Z134, etc.

He said he turned to his right like that when he heard the first of three shots ring out "right after completing the turn," or words to that effect.

But, maybe no Internet copy is clear enough to show it (if he indeed did it).

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: July 17, 2020, 05:56:11 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Fragments
« Reply #108 on: July 17, 2020, 04:16:27 PM »
Still dodging, I see.

"Dodging" what?  Your declaration that something else is happening?  Your inflated sense of self-worth?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Fragments
« Reply #108 on: July 17, 2020, 04:16:27 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Fragments
« Reply #109 on: July 17, 2020, 05:29:47 PM »
"Dodging" what?  Your declaration that something else is happening?  Your inflated sense of self-worth?

Park you ego at the curb for once. And no self-inflation needed: Only a sincere interest in flushing out CTBS.
« Last Edit: July 17, 2020, 08:14:34 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Fragments
« Reply #110 on: July 17, 2020, 06:34:31 PM »
I recall reading somewhere that Martin Hinrichs disowned that. He no longer believes that it shows Kennedy being hit in the back.

At all, or just z229?

I recently saw a Hinrichs post (posted in 2010 or so) in which he praises some guy named Vallee about some Umbrella Man thing. Maybe that's his thing now.
« Last Edit: July 18, 2020, 12:48:52 AM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Fragments
« Reply #110 on: July 17, 2020, 06:34:31 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Fragments
« Reply #111 on: July 17, 2020, 08:16:17 PM »
DIRECT IMPULSE EFFECT OF
PROJECTILE-TARGET COLLISION
------------------------------------

Excerpt: 'In the Zapruder Film President Kennedy is seen to react to three separate gunshots, the first missing him and the limo [6], [16], [4], [17], the next two hitting him with increasing accuracy. Further discussion of the first two shots is beyond the scope of this paper other than to note that all three gunshots had associated 1–2 frame anomalous movements, and a outward impulse is observed on the jacket lapel of Texas Governor John Connally [...] at the same time the President begins showing signs of being injured [12], [6], [7], but no other discernable impulses are otherwise seen on either of the two men* (prior to the third shot)'
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844017331882

*The 'whoosh' you just heard was the Hinrichs z229 COI flying out the window to the scrap-heap of CTer failed pet theories

----------------------------------------------------
Tools are readily available to all comers wishing
to test the Hinrichs z229 COI for themselves:
-----------------------------------------------------
Windows
https://win10.software/download-quicktime-player/
(Go here before d/l any software from the above site
https://www.scamvoid.net/check/win10.software/)
Mac
QuickTime Reader 10 comes with OS X installers
QuickTime Pro 7.6.6 is available for vintage software

« Last Edit: July 18, 2020, 09:47:47 PM by Bill Chapman »