So you keep claiming. But if none of the jigsaw pieces fit then you get no picture at all.
The "system" (at least as expressed by the VP who never actually performed any of the steps in "the system") said nothing about how packages were delivered to the post office, postage paid, or any documentation of when this was done. You would think the post office would also have a paper trail for packages that entered their system. Otherwise, what would they do if a package was claimed lost or stolen?
I'm still trying to figure out what envelope or order you think has a Klein's stamp on it. Please post a picture of it.
[edit: I see you edited your post to add a link to a picture of CE 773. Where do you see a "Klein's stamp showing that the order was processed" anywhere in that picture? I don't think you really understand what you are looking at.]
We do? Do you have anything at all that demonstrates that this package arrived at the Dallas post office and was picked up 5 days later? I seriously don't know where you're getting this stuff.
I'm not overlooking anything. How exactly do you know that "a bullet" (sic) ended up in the car, and how do you know it was fired from that rifle? Be specific. And let's say for the sake of argument that this is all completely true without any doubt. How does that tell you who pulled the trigger?
"Common sense" is what people appeal to when they don't have real evidence.
That's a matter of dispute among the people who actually handled the bullet found at Parkland.
This is the beginning of a circular argument. CE 399 was part of the assassination because it was fired by C2766, and C2766 was the murder weapon because it fired CE 399.
Your entire narrative is a make-believe fantasy, disguised as "common sense".
'But if none of the jigsaw pieces fit then you get no picture at all'
Duh. Of course they don't fit for you, Sherlock. Certainly not the way you lot twist, mangle, bend, and chew on the individual pieces like two-year-old children.
