Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Physical Impossibilities in the Zapruder Film  (Read 844 times)

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Physical Impossibilities in the Zapruder Film
« Reply #20 on: June 30, 2020, 02:01:46 PM »
To Michael Griffith,

You may want to read the Zavada report. In it, it was shown that the original Z film was not altered in any way. Despite what other researchers think, it would have been technically impossible to alter a home movie that was 8mm in size.

http://www.jfk-info.com/moot1.htm

----

You may want to view this synced video of Z and Nix:


You have to ask yourself how it'd be possible to alter one film and then have to alter the other film to make them match. It'd be impossible to do technically.

----

Here's a film produced by the SS in 1964:


So if the film was altered, why wouldn't they include the altered film in this government film they made? Except for the Z film being in B/W it looks exactly like the film we have all seen today. Skip to about 11:38.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2638
Re: Physical Impossibilities in the Zapruder Film
« Reply #21 on: July 02, 2020, 03:57:18 PM »
To Michael Griffith,

You may want to read the Zavada report. In it, it was shown that the original Z film was not altered in any way. Despite what other researchers think, it would have been technically impossible to alter a home movie that was 8mm in size.

http://www.jfk-info.com/moot1.htm

----

You may want to view this synced video of Z and Nix:


You have to ask yourself how it'd be possible to alter one film and then have to alter the other film to make them match. It'd be impossible to do technically.

----

Here's a film produced by the SS in 1964:


So if the film was altered, why wouldn't they include the altered film in this government film they made? Except for the Z film being in B/W it looks exactly like the film we have all seen today. Skip to about 11:38.

Yep, not one Zapruder frame has been altered in any way, wysiwyg.

JohnM

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 308
Re: Physical Impossibilities in the Zapruder Film
« Reply #22 on: July 04, 2020, 02:30:14 PM »
Yes, John, yes. What the film *actually* shows is highly suspicious. But, yes, the film itself was not altered, which is why it was kept away from public viewing for 12 long years. Put another way, I often wonder what would have happened if the film had been shown to the public that very day. Do you ever wonder why it didn't happen, John?

Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 199
Re: Physical Impossibilities in the Zapruder Film
« Reply #23 on: July 04, 2020, 05:23:23 PM »
Yes, John, yes. What the film *actually* shows is highly suspicious. But, yes, the film itself was not altered, which is why it was kept away from public viewing for 12 long years. Put another way, I often wonder what would have happened if the film had been shown to the public that very day. Do you ever wonder why it didn't happen, John?

 I know why it wasn't shown that day.  Because of the graphic nature of the film.   Besides, the contract Zapruder made with Life Magazine, stipulated that it not be made public.    Things were far, far different in 1963 than they are now, and stuff like this was far too graphic to show on TV.  Over the years, people became desensitized to such violence, so now it's not a big deal. It just shows how decadent society has become.   And i see nothing "suspicious" about what the film "actually shows".  May I ask what you expect it to show?
« Last Edit: July 04, 2020, 05:24:26 PM by Steve Barber »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2638
Re: Physical Impossibilities in the Zapruder Film
« Reply #24 on: July 05, 2020, 08:02:33 AM »
I know why it wasn't shown that day.  Because of the graphic nature of the film.   Besides, the contract Zapruder made with Life Magazine, stipulated that it not be made public.    Things were far, far different in 1963 than they are now, and stuff like this was far too graphic to show on TV.  Over the years, people became desensitized to such violence, so now it's not a big deal. It just shows how decadent society has become.   And i see nothing "suspicious" about what the film "actually shows".  May I ask what you expect it to show?

Quote
Things were far, far different in 1963 than they are now, and stuff like this was far too graphic to show on TV.

 Thumb1:

JohnM

 

Mobile View