This is how the rifle was gotten into the building

[Bill Chapman]

Horseshit.

What about when it struck the T1 vertebrae?


Pristine refers to loss of material, not a slight deformation. No bullet comes out of a barrel "Pristine", as you define it. BTW, did anyone bother to note how much material gets lost as the bullet travels thru the barrel? And where is a single re-enactment of a FMJ bullet striking 3 bones, causing 7 wounds then magically showing up slightly flattened and pristine (99% intact), with no DNA on it? That's the only study that could convince me.

Why do you keep clutching at straws and bending over backward to defend the WC? Oh right, because you sold your soul long ago to the LN hypothesis and you are seeing it thru come hell or high water. Good luck with that. Every coup needs rubes to pull it off. As long as there is not a 100% consensus that Oswald was a patsy, then the WC wins. They won because LNers jumped thru hoops to defend their Report for them. They relied on all CTs to be painted as tinfoil mad hatters and discredited their conspiracy theories by lumping them in with bigfoot sightings and UFO abductions. Today, the LNer approach is to clutch at straws to explain every single contradiction and anomaly re this case, because it's 1 strike and you're out for a LNer. If there is 1 chink in the armor then it is all over, Oswald was not a lone nut and the WC loses.

Maybe Oswald knew he was the designated patsy. Maybe he smuggled the rifle into the TSBD in pieces inside a paper bag. Maybe he took some shots from the SN and wiped off all his prints, ditched the rifle, bought a coke from a vending machine in the lunchroom within 90 secs. Maybe the MC wasn't leaky enough to deposit any nitrates on Oswald's face as he took the shots. Maybe Oswald was such an elite sharpshooter he could pull off a headshot using a crap rifle with a wonky scope and no practice. Maybe the magic bullet did zig-zag thru JFK and Connally and showed up on the wrong stretcher in near-pristine condition. Maybe the DPD were just incompetent and not nefarious when it came to handling the evidence and serving up Oswald to Ruby. But what part of those "maybe"s exclude Oswald from being a pasty? You are not really a LNer, you are a WC Defender, because Oswald was a patsy, not a lone nut.

Oswald said he was a patsy so it must be true. After all, he did say he was brought in because he had lived in the Soviet Union. And the little nobody needed to claim patsy status only once, apparently.

Oswald as Patsy

1) Tried to miss JFK but was even a worse shot than what CTrolls dreamed up.
2) Only tried firing warning shots across the bow hood at Tippit but missed again.
3) Tried to hand over his revolver to the cops in the TT but damn near screwed that up.

[John Iacoletti]

Chapman thinks his sarcastic quips are clever and relevant.

Don't be like Chapman.

[Bill Chapman]

Thank you for proving my point. I told you you wouldn't get it.

In other words you can't explain what's clever about the post to which I'm referring

To Wit:
Reply#182 Weidmann
How would you know? You need a functional brain and at least some level of eduction to make such a determination. You've got neither.

> I'm not surprised that your qualifications for being 'clever' both begin & end with Ad Homs

[Bill Chapman]

Chapman thinks his sarcastic quips are clever and relevant.

Don't be like Chapman.

Taking a knee at Oswald's grave speaks volumes.
Ditto for not taking a knee at Tippit's.

Don't be like Iacoletti.

[Thomas Graves]

Taking a knee at Oswald's grave speaks volumes.
Ditto for not taking a knee at Tippit's.

Don't be like Iacoletti.

Hard to believe, seein' as how he's an Atheist.

--  MWT 

[Martin Weidmann]

In other words you can't explain what's clever about the post to which I'm referring

To Wit:
#Rely#182 Weidmann
How would you know? You need a functional brain and at least some level of eduction to make such a determination. You've got neither.

> I'm not surprised that your qualifications for being 'clever' both begin & end with Ad Homs

I'm sorry that you don't understand this, but I was just making a factual statement. Asking what is clever about a factual statement is just dumb. If I could I would gladly explain it even better to you, but as I said before, I can't dumb things down any further to get to your level.

Btw, if you are going to quote me, it would be just a bit more honest when you provide the real and complete quote as well as the correct context. Here, I'll do it for you;

Your comment;

No chance of either of you ever saying something clever

I can see just how hard it is for you to write anything at all
You both have something in common with JFK: Head cavitation

my reply;

No chance of either of you ever saying something clever

How would you know?

You need a functional brain and at least some level of eduction to make such a determination. You've got neither.

And then the idiot complains about ad homs.... Go figure!

[John Iacoletti]

Taking a knee at Oswald's grave speaks volumes.

You have yet to explain why that's such an issue for you.

Ditto for not taking a knee at Tippit's.

How would you know where I have or have not "taken a knee"?  Do you even know where Tippit's grave is?  Without looking it up.