Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery  (Read 9704 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2020, 05:51:38 PM »
Advertisement
The HSCA panel also concluded that the rifle in the photos was the same rifle that was recovered from the sniper's next/sixth floor window.

Not for any good reason.

Mr. FITHIAN. Then I take it, it is your testimony that the chip or the defect is sufficiently unique, with the corners or whatever, that spotting it in each of the pictures at least gives you the confidence that that rifle you are holding is the rifle that was photographed?
Sergeant KIRK. When I match that up with the scientific data Mr. McCamy has obtained from measuring it, this has to tilt the scales in the direction, yes, indeed it is the same rifle.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2020, 05:51:38 PM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2020, 10:19:46 PM »
Oswald denied he was in those photos. He got it right - they pasted his face on someone else - and said he'd show how it was done. That, and the weird left side of his neck where the shading of it blends in with the fence background, is good enough for me.

If you stare at the photo long enough, you can see where the outline of the paste job is of his head.

Offline Steve Barber

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 398
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2020, 02:24:25 AM »

 Nonsense.  Marina Oswald took the pictures.  She said this herself.  Why do you people continually bring up these old conspiracy theories  that were laid to rest years ago.  So Oswald said his face was pasted onto someone elses body. He lied, like he lied about everything else. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2020, 02:24:25 AM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2020, 04:07:29 PM »
It would help you [but probably not] to know that there have been many, many cases where the official story of the case has been wrong or incorrect, or swept under the rug to reach a foregone conclusion. One very good example is the Ramsey case. Despite all evidence that there was no intruder in the family house and it was an inside job, the family, with the help of hiring a bevy of lawyers, was able to twist and turn the story to push the intruder story. And of course the gullible media to this day has lapped it up.

There are too many inconsistencies and implausibilities in the Kennedy case to accept the official story no questions asked. Marina Oswald was immediately sequestered by police and the FBI and coached months later about what to say. There are detailed articles about this out there, so look it up. The finding of the BYP are odd as well. Again, there are plenty of good articles out there about that.

Despite not recording a single interview with LHO during that weekend, he said what he said. The photos were not of him, someone pasted his face on another's body and he could show how it's done. And he had a right to present that during his day in court but sadly he never got that chance.

As for the experts, there are plenty of "experts" out there that do all kinds of "scientific" measures but in the final analysis can and will come to a foregone conclusion. Just because they use some million-dollar piece of machinery to analyze them does not mean they're always right. This applies to the experts on the other side of the fence. Again, like the Ramsey case, this happened with the RN's writing analysis. The kicker, for me, for that case was to see the mother actually sit during a recorded deposition and repeatedly deny over and over again examples of her own handwriting.

Oswald didn't lie about everything. He blurted out that he lived in Russia (true) and he also blurted out that he was a patsy (also true). He was no dummy and knew as events unfolded throughout the weekend what was shaping up for him.

It is amazing how you people think you can just make evidence disappear. Just deny things, refute empirical and technical evidence - without showing where it's wrong - and just ignore it.

Actually, Steve, it's the other way around. It's people like you who most probably don't like the Kennedys and, therefore, you're biased about the case because you simply cannot see beyond the official story.

Here is one of my favorite photos from the case. What you're seeing here is not Bob Groden and Dave Lifton in Dealey Plaza goofing around. What you're seeing are FBI officials conducting their official investigation of the case by recreating the shots. Let's forget for a moment, which people like you ALWAYS bring up when this photo is shown, that the car is not the same. Let's forget, too, that the Kennedy stand in may be too high or the Connolly guy may be too low. These don't matter at all here.

What matters is this - the FBI guys have 100% access to the autopsy record and photos. This is mere months after 11/22. So basing their work on this official record, they say, "OK, let's put a sticker on the Kennedy guy based on the bullet that hit him in the back." And because they knew that based on the official record, there was NO bullet of entry or exit in that rear sticker ABOVE the back wound. Therefore, that sticker on the rear neck is where the THROAT wound is. In other words, the wound that Kennedy in the front in his throat.

So now thy're like, "Great! But wait a minute. How in the xxxx could this lower sticker exit UPWARD and out of the front in the throat area when the shot is coming DOWNWARD?!"

So Steve, try to explain that. But you see, Steve, you won't so, therefore, you'll just ignore it. And the reason why you'll ignore it is simply because you can't logically and plausibly explain how that could physically happen.



« Last Edit: March 16, 2020, 07:04:38 PM by Michael Walton »

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2261
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2020, 08:08:06 PM »
Here is one of my favorite photos from the case. What you're seeing here is not Bob Groden and Dave Lifton in Dealey Plaza goofing around. What you're seeing are FBI officials conducting their official investigation of the case by recreating the shots. Let's forget for a moment, which people like you ALWAYS bring up when this photo is shown, that the car is not the same. Let's forget, too, that the Kennedy stand in may be too high or the Connolly guy may be too low. These don't matter at all here.

What matters is this - the FBI guys have 100% access to the autopsy record and photos. This is mere months after 11/22. So basing their work on this official record, they say, "OK, let's put a sticker on the Kennedy guy based on the bullet that hit him in the back." And because they knew that based on the official record, there was NO bullet of entry or exit in that rear sticker ABOVE the back wound. Therefore, that sticker on the rear neck is where the THROAT wound is. In other words, the wound that Kennedy in the front in his throat.

So now thy're like, "Great! But wait a minute. How in the xxxx could this lower sticker exit UPWARD and out of the front in the throat area when the shot is coming DOWNWARD?!"

So Steve, try to explain that. But you see, Steve, you won't so, therefore, you'll just ignore it. And the reason why you'll ignore it is simply because you can't logically and plausibly explain how that could physically happen.



What's the problem?

The bullet enters at the C7 level and exits at the T1 level. I don't see a conflict in the photos, other than they're taken from different camera angles and aren't directly comparable as you try to present.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2020, 08:08:06 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #13 on: March 17, 2020, 04:22:05 AM »
It is amazing how you people think you can just make evidence disappear.

It is amazing how you people think that something like the backyard photos constitutes evidence for who killed JFK.

Offline Michael Walton

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 443
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2020, 12:44:04 PM »
What's the problem? The bullet enters at the C7 level and exits at the T1 level. I don't see a conflict in the photos, other than they're taken from different camera angles and aren't directly comparable as you try to present.

Sure, Jerry, sure. And need I remind you that there was NO termination hole on the other side of his body? In other words, Humes himself stuck either a probe or finger in that rear back wound and found NO exit.

Uh, huh. Right, Jerry, right.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #14 on: March 17, 2020, 12:44:04 PM »


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2261
Re: Oswald Backyard Photo Fakery
« Reply #15 on: March 17, 2020, 03:07:28 PM »
What's the problem? The bullet enters at the C7 level and exits at the T1 level. I don't see a conflict in the photos, other than they're taken from different camera angles and aren't directly comparable as you try to present.

Sure, Jerry, sure. And need I remind you that there was NO termination hole on the other side of his body? In other words, Humes himself stuck either a probe or finger in that rear back wound and found NO exit.

Uh, huh. Right, Jerry, right.

Finck used a metal probe that was said to have gone in several inches. The failure of a probe in muscular regions is not uncommon. Boswell thought muscles within the neck had closed off the missile channel. The neck region is very mobile, and the relationship of the muscles during wounding and at autopsy would have been different.

The HSCA Forensic Pathology Panel:

    "believes that the difficulty which Drs. Humes, Finck, and Boswell experienced in trying to place
     a soft probe through the bullet pathway in President Kennedy’s neck probably resulted from their
     failure or inability to manipulate this portion of the body into the same position it was in when the
     missile penetrated. Rigor mortis may have hindered this manipulation. Such placement would
     have enabled reconstruction of the relationships of the neck and shoulder when the missile struck.
     It is customary, however, to dissect missile tracks to determine damage and pathway. Probing a
     track blindly may produce false tracks and misinformation."

Humes refused to dissect the neck out of respect for the President, and that it was unnecessary because the cause of death was the head wound.

You're in need of another mountaintop talk with Grandpa Walton.