Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 104

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.  (Read 282072 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #126 on: March 04, 2020, 04:01:34 PM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on March 04, 2020, 03:45:15 PM
Reality has a way of disturbing fantasies...

Yes, that true....  thus the Warren Report is "disturbed" 
Logged

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #127 on: March 04, 2020, 04:23:56 PM »
Quote from: Walt Cakebread on March 04, 2020, 04:01:34 PM
Yes, that true....  thus the Warren Report is "disturbed"

Dream on...
Logged

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #128 on: March 04, 2020, 04:54:25 PM »
Quote from: Pat Speer on March 04, 2020, 01:48:17 AM
Trask didn't have access to the digitized copies of the bag in front of the building now available. As first noticed by the late great researcher John Hunt, and presented on the Lancer Forum, if I recall, Montgomery's watch was fairly clear in one of the photos. Here is a close-up of that watch.



Well, photo-manipulation techniques are available
I don't think you'd get that one by a sharp prosecutor
But thanks for the contribution nevertheless.

Beers, Allen, and Smith likely had their own watches
A precise time of 2:19 sounds like someone looked at their own watch
« Last Edit: March 04, 2020, 05:15:14 PM by Bill Chapman »
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #129 on: March 04, 2020, 05:43:36 PM »
Does Trask give a source for his "2:19"?

Patrick's discovery of what may be CE 142 on top of boxes in a Dallas PD photo unfortunately tells us nothing about who placed it there and when.
Logged

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #130 on: March 04, 2020, 06:16:33 PM »
Quote from: John Iacoletti on March 04, 2020, 05:43:36 PM
Does Trask give a source for his "2:19"?

Patrick's discovery of what may be CE 142 on top of boxes in a Dallas PD photo unfortunately tells us nothing about who placed it there and when.

How do we prove that the wrapper in the photo is the bag that Montgomery carried out of the TSBD.....The bag (wrapper) in the photo seems to be more crumpled than Montgomery's....
Logged

Online Charles Collins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4402
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #131 on: March 04, 2020, 06:38:16 PM »
Quote from: Walt Cakebread on March 04, 2020, 06:16:33 PM
How do we prove that the wrapper in the photo is the bag that Montgomery carried out of the TSBD.....The bag (wrapper) in the photo seems to be more crumpled than Montgomery's....

For Iacoletti, there is no evidence of anything whatsoever. Therefore, there can’t be proof either...
Logged

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's sack in the Sniper's nest.
« Reply #132 on: March 04, 2020, 06:54:50 PM »
Quote from: Charles Collins on March 04, 2020, 06:38:16 PM
For Iacoletti, there is no evidence of anything whatsoever. Therefore, there can’t be proof either...

Nice strawman.  Maybe you can address the things I actually say, instead.

Hey I can do that too:  Collins doesn't need any evidence whatsoever.  The WC said it and that's good enough for him.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2020, 06:56:13 PM by John Iacoletti »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 17 18 [19] 20 21 ... 104
« previous next »