LN perspective v CT perspective

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: LN perspective v CT perspective  (Read 12849 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: LN perspective v CT perspective
« Reply #21 on: February 01, 2020, 01:29:54 AM »
I always assumed it was a conspiracy until I started reading about it really.

On that note, one of the things thaat at least points to Oswald being the shooter or at the very least part of a plot was - as you say someone interested (obsessed) with politics - just leaving fore the day after the president is assassinated outside the building he worked in. Kind of shrug of the shoulders and may as well go to the cinema kind of thing.

Nah.

If you were honest with yourself, you'd admit that you became confused and simply decided the easiest way was to accept the fairy tale created by LBJ's Special Blue Ribbon Committee

Offline David Monaghan

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Re: LN perspective v CT perspective
« Reply #22 on: February 01, 2020, 01:34:00 AM »
So Mr Monahan accepts Lee Oswald's word that Lee was inside the TSBD at the time that JFK was ambushed and murdered ......Perhaps he's unaware that Lee didn't simply say that he was in the TSBD.....He specified that he was in the 1st floor lunchroom at the time the president passed by the TSBD.
It's Monaghan thanks. Pointless response as regardless he wasn't outside. 1,2,3,4,5th,floor who cares, my point is ( from a CT) If he wasn't involved and knew of an impending plot which could potentially be traced or blamed on him i'm pretty sure i'd have been making a point of being noticed by co workers during this shooting.

Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 146
Re: LN perspective v CT perspective
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2020, 03:22:53 PM »
The operative word here is "reportedly". The truth is that we don't know when exactly Oswald left the building and how. All we really know for sure is that he was arrested at the Texas Theater a little over an hour after the murder. Everything else in between... the entire narative is just a story

Bus transfer, landlady saw him, taxi driver. Are we ignoring this evidence now?

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: LN perspective v CT perspective
« Reply #24 on: February 01, 2020, 09:03:50 PM »
Proves while 95% off his coworkers were out watching the president a fella interested in world affairs appeared fairly uninterested, simply stating i personally find it strange?

Monaghan,

Don't you realize the evil, evil, evil CIA gave poor widdle Oswald a fake assignment -- to guard the candy machine in the Second Floor dining room from 12:20, on, so he could be encountered there by evil, evil Marion Baker and evil, evil Roy Truly about 90 seconds after the assassination, and later charged with The Crime Of The Century?

LOL

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: February 02, 2020, 07:01:30 PM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: LN perspective v CT perspective
« Reply #25 on: February 02, 2020, 08:25:27 PM »
It's Monaghan thanks. Pointless response as regardless he wasn't outside. 1,2,3,4,5th,floor who cares, my point is ( from a CT) If he wasn't involved and knew of an impending plot which could potentially be traced or blamed on him i'm pretty sure i'd have been making a point of being noticed by co workers during this shooting.

Not if you wanted to convince Castro's agents that you had "ATTEMPTED" to shoot JFK........You would not have wanted anybody who could say...."He never attempted to shoot JFK, Because I saw him in the toilet at the time That he supposed was taking a shot at JFK"

( This is the reason that Lee saw Jarman and Norman enter the 1st floor at 12:27, but they never saw him.....He didn't want them to see him.)

Nor would you want a photo taken, that showed you poking your head out of the door of the TSBD at the time that you want Castro's agents to believe that you had attempted to shoot Castro's arch foe.
« Last Edit: February 02, 2020, 08:32:54 PM by Walt Cakebread »