Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: A Question For CT's  (Read 603 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4877
A Question For CT's
« on: January 25, 2020, 04:27:03 PM »
Why do many CT's allow themselves to be manipulated and mislead by the lies?

This case ( the murder of JFK) is not at all complicated.....  However, it becomes a convoluted mess in the hands of LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee" (aka The Warren Commission. )    Any reasonably intelligent person can look at the witness reports for Friday 11/ 22 / 63 and know with 99% certainty that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot JFK.   If a open minded intelligent person concentrates on the evidence and statements of witnesses for Friday 11/22/63 it's very obvious that the WC was NOT interested in investigating and baring the truth to the American public.....It's obvious that their goal was to distort and discredit the eyewitness accounts, and cover up the truth. 

Online Paul May

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2020, 02:16:30 AM »
Why do many CT's allow themselves to be manipulated and mislead by the lies?

This case ( the murder of JFK) is not at all complicated.....  However, it becomes a convoluted mess in the hands of LBJ's "Special Select Blue Ribbon Committee" (aka The Warren Commission. )    Any reasonably intelligent person can look at the witness reports for Friday 11/ 22 / 63 and know with 99% certainty that Lee Harvey Oswald did not shoot JFK.   If a open minded intelligent person concentrates on the evidence and statements of witnesses for Friday 11/22/63 it's very obvious that the WC was NOT interested in investigating and baring the truth to the American public.....It's obvious that their goal was to distort and discredit the eyewitness accounts, and cover up the truth.
What is the purpose of this OP?


Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3259
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2020, 02:45:21 AM »
What is the purpose of this OP?

I think he wants us to agree with him that the evil, evil, evil Military Industrial Intelligence Community Complex murdered JFK, just like mobbed-up Jim Garrison, KGB operative Mark Lane, and Oliver "I Like Putin and My Son Works for RT!" Stone said.

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: January 27, 2020, 02:46:09 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4877
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2020, 03:03:43 PM »
What is the purpose of this OP?

It is an attempt to get CT's to open their eyes and realize that the WR is a crock!...  Once a person realizes that the WR is a crock, they should be smart enough to refrain from using it in an attempt to support some theory.

A smart CT will understand that the WR is the gospel of the LNer....

Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2020, 05:21:37 PM »
A smart CT will understand that the WR is the gospel of the LNer....

Thats an oxymoron.




*smiley face*

Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 521
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2020, 05:39:27 PM »
Just to note here that Mr. Cakebread says that LBJ was going to announce that Castro was behind the assassination and then use that claim as a pretext to invade Cuba.

But Mr. Cakebread says that LBJ learned, shortly before the announcement, that the Soviet Union had sent bombers loaded with nuclear weapons - the planes were on their way - to bomb the US. So LBJ decided to cancel his announcement. And the Soviets called the planes back.

Of course there isn't a single shred of evidence for any of this. It's completely made up.

If you believe anything that Mr. Cakebread says on this terrible event then you're making a big mistake. But you'll have to figure that out for yourself.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2020, 05:43:16 PM by Steve M. Galbraith »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4877
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2020, 05:54:57 PM »
Just to note here that Mr. Cakebread says that LBJ was going to announce that Castro was behind the assassination and then use that claim as a pretext to invade Cuba.

But Mr. Cakebread says that LBJ learned, shortly before the announcement, that the Soviet Union had sent bombers loaded with nuclear weapons - the planes were on their way - to bomb the US. So LBJ decided to cancel his announcement. And the Soviets called the planes back.

Of course there isn't a single shred of evidence for any of this. It's completely made up.

If you believe anything that Mr. Cakebread says on this terrible event then you're making a big mistake. But you'll have to figure that out for yourself.

Wow!...Thank you Mr Gutbreath.....   The fact that you are desperately trying to discredit me is a compliment.   You clearly recognize that I'm someone to be muzzled.....  And just for your enlightenment ( because you're clearly ignorant.) There were U-2 photos that revealed that the missiles in Cuba were being moved onto their launch pads....  And Russia was launching bombers ....    LBJ nearly soiled his skivvies when he learned of those events, and he realized that they would have to scrub their plans to attack Cuba.

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 331
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2020, 06:23:45 PM »
Wow!...Thank you Mr Gutbreath.....   The fact that you are desperately trying to discredit me is a compliment.   You clearly recognize that I'm someone to be muzzled.....  And just for your enlightenment ( because you're clearly ignorant.) There were U-2 photos that revealed that the missiles in Cuba were being moved onto their launch pads....  And Russia was launching bombers ....    LBJ nearly soiled his skivvies when he learned of those events, and he realized that they would have to scrub their plans to attack Cuba.

Well, maybe since Oswald shot Kennedy, none of this matters.  Go from there, be on the square+

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 342
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2020, 03:25:20 AM »
I would  be content if it were just Oswald the lone nut as the WC proposed and there were no MIC and no CIA involvement and it was just a horrible event that no one in the security community could have anticipated.

Problem is that there were persons who knew Oswald, associated with Oswald, whom were themselves VIPs and connected with what is now called “the deep state”, formerly referred to as “shadow government”.

This kind of evil comprises members across several agencies which include
mafia” of which some members such as Jack Ruby play double roles as a nexus between the “good” and the “bad” elites

in this particular case, the “good, the bad, and the “ugly”  elites reached a consensus that JFK was their common denominator disrupting their interconnected criminal enterprises and in the case of the CIA, their very existence given JFKs public declaration to  “scatter them to the winds”

The final verdict was reached at the secret meeting of LBJ  when the justification was concocted that JFK had become a “national security threat” and that he should  be removed by whatever means necessary.

And 50 years, lo and behold, that same kind of rhetorical and incendiary language is used by another CIA director and repeated by media to threaten removal of a US President

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 493
Re: A Question For CT's
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2020, 03:54:18 AM »
I would  be content if it were just Oswald the lone nut as the WC proposed and there were no MIC and no CIA involvement and it was just a horrible event that no one in the security community could have anticipated.

Problem is that there were persons who knew Oswald, associated with Oswald, whom were themselves VIPs and connected with what is now called “the deep state”, formerly referred to as “shadow government”.

This kind of evil comprises members across several agencies which include
mafia” of which some members such as Jack Ruby play double roles as a nexus between the “good” and the “bad” elites

in this particular case, the “good, the bad, and the “ugly”  elites reached a consensus that JFK was their common denominator disrupting their interconnected criminal enterprises and in the case of the CIA, their very existence given JFKs public declaration to  “scatter them to the winds”

The final verdict was reached at the secret meeting of LBJ  when the justification was concocted that JFK had become a “national security threat” and that he should  be removed by whatever means necessary.

And 50 years, lo and behold, that same kind of rhetorical and incendiary language is used by another CIA director and repeated by media to threaten removal of a US President
I suppose that I will never be able to believe that anyone with prior knowledge of the 11/22/'63 assassination attempt, would allow themselves to be in DealeyPlaza at 12:30pm CST, in an open top automobile, on Elm St anywhere between Houston St and the Triple RR Underpass.

 

Mobile View