Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Dal Tex Roof Shooter  (Read 2270 times)

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2020, 08:33:00 PM »
The throat shot...which did occur, is perfectly consistent with this angle.



https://photos.app.goo.gl/NLJLshi2RzEwAdmf8 



https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipOLRtzvouS8a7JG01TTG1Gs6vRUKHCqgtWRubqh0scfH-zLSiAwaYlbl4Ny5WS2bQ?key=YTNUREpNbVFYLWhXME5vd3hGV0FQeFhqbllBM3Zn

Sorry for posting the photos twice. For some reason the "insert image" doesn't work.


Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2020, 09:46:44 PM »
So here's a better way to show the difference between the shooter positions and the angles involved.




Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1108
    • Plaza 3D
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2020, 01:13:59 AM »
The shooter on the Dal Tex building roof can be seen in the Zapruder film. He is responsible for the shot that exists the throat.



This is the photo from Time Life...  in case anyone tries to accuse me of inserting people into photos. And yes I marked where the gunman is because some people have bad eyes.



It's good the CTs have their own photo interpretation and trajectory experts.

   

That "Dal Tex Gunman" sure is persistent.

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2020, 01:57:09 AM »
It's good the CTs have their own photo interpretation and trajectory experts.

   

That "Dal Tex Gunman" sure is persistent.

Ah, yes of course. The Dal Tex shooter doesn't exist. What your eyes can see is just a trick. What the government say's happened is what really happened. Makes perfect sense to the old timers. One man who couldn't shoot for crap simply popped off multiple shots with the shittiest rifle on the planet. And then this same man was seen running down a hill and jumped into a car, where he caught the bus that took him from downtown Dallas to Oak Cliff, right through the traffic and crowds of a presidential parade. Making multiple stops along the way, all within 30 min. Sweet!

And after super shooter got out of his car, or off the bus, he managed to kill a cop with his trusty 38 revolver. Then he left his wallet, because why not... he already left all the evidence needed to catch him back at his place of work...where he brought a rifle to kill the president of the united states. What better place than your job? And because he wanted to get away, he left his finger prints everywhere. Even though he bought the rifle with a fake name, all so he could leave his evidence.

After his murderous spree, he got dressed and went to the movies. But not without his trusty cop killing 38, because why not bring that along too?

And cool as a CUCUMBER, but trying to hide from the police that no doubt identified him as the killer without even testing a single piece of evidence yet, simply waited. Then shocked that the cops found him, he pulled out his trusty cop killing 38 and yelled "It's all over now ya chee...take that copper."  But the brave cops who flooded the scene for a call about a man who snuck into the movies, thwarted his deadly attempts to kill them all too. And then they verified his identity by checking his wallet... which also happened to be found at the murder scene of the dead cop, at the same exact time.

Yeah... Conspiracy theorists are so crazy. Nothing strange about any of that. Only the really super intelligent people understand that truth. The same people who witnessed shots from the front and still believe Oswald did it from behind... with his trusty magic bullets of course. 

Yeah... super intellectual. Just like their humor.   ::)

Gee, with all these super amateur sleuths on the case it's amazing 50+ years have gone by without any progress at all. Despite all the evidence staring them right in their super smart faces!  Great job. You've only had 50 years. LOL Thumbs up.
« Last Edit: March 06, 2020, 02:08:36 AM by Izraul Hidashi »

Offline Izraul Hidashi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 74
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2020, 02:47:48 AM »
I guess we all should try to remember that none of these new things being found are real. Why? Because the old men that have been studying this case for 50 years can't fathom how they could of missed things that simple. Even though all of these photos and videos are the same ones they had access to.

Like these 2 men with rifles in the pergola. Just forget the fact that of all the places for an assassin to be, that was the prime spot. Hell, that's where I would have been too. Not just for concealability, but because of the ease to get in and out. But I wouldn't expect squares to understand that. And forget the fact that witnesses saw smoke in this same exact spot, or that shells were found there too. Why? Because 2 + 2 can't equal 4. Ignore Zapruders testimony about believing the shooters were behind him as well. And all the people, including cops who ran in that direction. But most of all, ignore the fact that the head shot lines up perfectly with the pergola window. The 2 men clearly holding rifles are just a figment of conspiracy theorists imagination. And all the witnesses too. What you really see is just thumb print damage.

See... this only looks like 2 men with rifles. But the super smart old people know it's just thumb print damage.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/3xBMRj5CLQ9kYrxC8

Yes, thump print damage can wear sun glasses too. Don't act like you never seen it before.

And so what if you can see them in other photos and videos... like this one here.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/VBYwXSEg1EQZSf8W6

They still don't exist. Just a magical trick by awful mean conspiracy theorists, right? Never believe your own eyes is great motto to live by. Always listen to the people who pretend they know everything but can't even solve a puzzle, because that's how cases get solved. As we've seen with this one over the last 50+ years.

And like the last genius points out, there was no Dal Tex roof shooter. Forget the fact some worker actually found shells on that roof. Or the fact the exact camera model Zapruder was using had a million complaints due to the reflections caused by its concave lens.

Nope! This is your man right here. Posing like a genius with all the evidence so he wouldn't get busted. Which must be why he used a fake name and went all the way across town to avoid detection when purchasing the rifle he would later pose with. "Yeah...can't let anyone know I bought it, so I better pose with it, while holding up a communist manifesto too, just in case someone is too stupid to figure it out."   

1 man. 10 shots. 1 kill.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/F1WnE9Qj8V8zoriKA

"I don't wanna get caught so I better leave my finger prints everywhere to make it easy for the cops!!"  Thumb1:

Yup. All the witnesses are wrong. Your own eyes wrong. But these funny old men who haven't found a shred of evidence on their own in 50 years time are right. Thanks for setting record straight guys. Now that you've cracked the case the rest of the world needs you.  8)


Seriously. If gullibility were a disease, America would be on lock down. To think all it takes is a few pieces of intentionally left evidence to fool a majority of the people into believing the absurd. 

"Oh it couldn't have been a conspiracy... because those things don't exist. There's no such thing as dirty copy, or bad people."  Bravo!
« Last Edit: March 06, 2020, 03:00:18 AM by Izraul Hidashi »

Offline Jim Brazell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #15 on: May 30, 2020, 05:54:00 AM »
But there is no bullet hole in the windshield at the time JFK jerked his balled up hands and arms up to his chest/neck. I assume if he got shot in the throat/neck that he would react to it? Grab it? Be moved back? Something?

And what happened to the bullet that hit him in the back? Did that disappear too? I mean, two vanishing bullets is difficult to understand. And the bullet that hit Connally seemed to have been tumbling. What caused that to tumble?

When/where on the Zapruder film did this shot occur? We can see him react after he emerges from behind the highway sign, circa Z-223, and then when he is hit in the head at Z-313. Where did this shot that hit in the neck/throat take place?



Just curious how you know there was no hole in the windshield....we know there was a hole in the windshield observed at Parkland Hospital. Do we know that he was not hit in the throat when emerging from behind sign ? The picture is very hard to view for a bullet hole IMO.

Offline Jim Brazell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #16 on: May 30, 2020, 06:02:40 AM »
I guess we all should try to remember that none of these new things being found are real. Why? Because the old men that have been studying this case for 50 years can't fathom how they could of missed things that simple. Even though all of these photos and videos are the same ones they had access to.

Like these 2 men with rifles in the pergola. Just forget the fact that of all the places for an assassin to be, that was the prime spot. Hell, that's where I would have been too. Not just for concealability, but because of the ease to get in and out. But I wouldn't expect squares to understand that. And forget the fact that witnesses saw smoke in this same exact spot, or that shells were found there too. Why? Because 2 + 2 can't equal 4. Ignore Zapruders testimony about believing the shooters were behind him as well. And all the people, including cops who ran in that direction. But most of all, ignore the fact that the head shot lines up perfectly with the pergola window. The 2 men clearly holding rifles are just a figment of conspiracy theorists imagination. And all the witnesses too. What you really see is just thumb print damage.

See... this only looks like 2 men with rifles. But the super smart old people know it's just thumb print damage.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/3xBMRj5CLQ9kYrxC8

Yes, thump print damage can wear sun glasses too. Don't act like you never seen it before.

And so what if you can see them in other photos and videos... like this one here.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/VBYwXSEg1EQZSf8W6

They still don't exist. Just a magical trick by awful mean conspiracy theorists, right? Never believe your own eyes is great motto to live by. Always listen to the people who pretend they know everything but can't even solve a puzzle, because that's how cases get solved. As we've seen with this one over the last 50+ years.

And like the last genius points out, there was no Dal Tex roof shooter. Forget the fact some worker actually found shells on that roof. Or the fact the exact camera model Zapruder was using had a million complaints due to the reflections caused by its concave lens.

Nope! This is your man right here. Posing like a genius with all the evidence so he wouldn't get busted. Which must be why he used a fake name and went all the way across town to avoid detection when purchasing the rifle he would later pose with. "Yeah...can't let anyone know I bought it, so I better pose with it, while holding up a communist manifesto too, just in case someone is too stupid to figure it out."   

1 man. 10 shots. 1 kill.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/F1WnE9Qj8V8zoriKA

"I don't wanna get caught so I better leave my finger prints everywhere to make it easy for the cops!!"  Thumb1:

Yup. All the witnesses are wrong. Your own eyes wrong. But these funny old men who haven't found a shred of evidence on their own in 50 years time are right. Thanks for setting record straight guys. Now that you've cracked the case the rest of the world needs you.  8)


Seriously. If gullibility were a disease, America would be on lock down. To think all it takes is a few pieces of intentionally left evidence to fool a majority of the people into believing the absurd. 

"Oh it couldn't have been a conspiracy... because those things don't exist. There's no such thing as dirty copy, or bad people."  Bravo!

Some really good pics here. Here is a close up of Records Bldg. shooter. 


Offline Nicholas Turner

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 438
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #17 on: May 30, 2020, 03:51:06 PM »
I guess we all should try to remember that none of these new things being found are real. Why? Because the old men that have been studying this case for 50 years can't fathom how they could of missed things that simple. Even though all of these photos and videos are the same ones they had access to.

Like these 2 men with rifles in the pergola. Just forget the fact that of all the places for an assassin to be, that was the prime spot. Hell, that's where I would have been too. Not just for concealability, but because of the ease to get in and out. But I wouldn't expect squares to understand that. And forget the fact that witnesses saw smoke in this same exact spot, or that shells were found there too. Why? Because 2 + 2 can't equal 4. Ignore Zapruders testimony about believing the shooters were behind him as well. And all the people, including cops who ran in that direction. But most of all, ignore the fact that the head shot lines up perfectly with the pergola window. The 2 men clearly holding rifles are just a figment of conspiracy theorists imagination. And all the witnesses too. What you really see is just thumb print damage.

See... this only looks like 2 men with rifles. But the super smart old people know it's just thumb print damage.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/3xBMRj5CLQ9kYrxC8

Yes, thump print damage can wear sun glasses too. Don't act like you never seen it before.

And so what if you can see them in other photos and videos... like this one here.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/VBYwXSEg1EQZSf8W6

They still don't exist. Just a magical trick by awful mean conspiracy theorists, right? Never believe your own eyes is great motto to live by. Always listen to the people who pretend they know everything but can't even solve a puzzle, because that's how cases get solved. As we've seen with this one over the last 50+ years.

And like the last genius points out, there was no Dal Tex roof shooter. Forget the fact some worker actually found shells on that roof. Or the fact the exact camera model Zapruder was using had a million complaints due to the reflections caused by its concave lens.

Nope! This is your man right here. Posing like a genius with all the evidence so he wouldn't get busted. Which must be why he used a fake name and went all the way across town to avoid detection when purchasing the rifle he would later pose with. "Yeah...can't let anyone know I bought it, so I better pose with it, while holding up a communist manifesto too, just in case someone is too stupid to figure it out."   

1 man. 10 shots. 1 kill.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/F1WnE9Qj8V8zoriKA

"I don't wanna get caught so I better leave my finger prints everywhere to make it easy for the cops!!"  Thumb1:

Yup. All the witnesses are wrong. Your own eyes wrong. But these funny old men who haven't found a shred of evidence on their own in 50 years time are right. Thanks for setting record straight guys. Now that you've cracked the case the rest of the world needs you.  8)


Seriously. If gullibility were a disease, America would be on lock down. To think all it takes is a few pieces of intentionally left evidence to fool a majority of the people into believing the absurd. 

"Oh it couldn't have been a conspiracy... because those things don't exist. There's no such thing as dirty copy, or bad people."  Bravo!

Where is the shooter peering round the corner in the Willis slide 7? How tall would the shooters need to be to fire through the openings?

Offline Chris Bristow

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2020, 02:53:38 AM »
The supposed image of the DalTex shooter appears in the same spot as late as frame 481. At that point Zapruder is facing about 170 degrees away from the DalTex. It is absolutely completely impossible for any image from the DalTex to enter the lens of Zapruders camera when he is facing 170 degrees away from it. It is even more absurd to think the image would appear in the same location on the film after panning even 30 degrees let alone 170 degrees. This theory was originally about the jail and court building as it has light posts that somewhat match the shape in the Z film. Still there is no way for that image to enter the camera at frame 481. No reflection of the front housing of the lens could account for an image from Houston and Elm.

Offline Jim Brazell

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
Re: Dal Tex Roof Shooter
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2020, 04:25:22 AM »
The supposed image of the DalTex shooter appears in the same spot as late as frame 481. At that point Zapruder is facing about 170 degrees away from the DalTex. It is absolutely completely impossible for any image from the DalTex to enter the lens of Zapruders camera when he is facing 170 degrees away from it. It is even more absurd to think the image would appear in the same location on the film after panning even 30 degrees let alone 170 degrees. This theory was originally about the jail and court building as it has light posts that somewhat match the shape in the Z film. Still there is no way for that image to enter the camera at frame 481. No reflection of the front housing of the lens could account for an image from Houston and Elm.

First of all, it is IMPERATIVE to get the correct building...it is the Records Bldg !!!! And let me assure that it is indeed possible for the shooter shown on top of the RECORDS BLDG to be reflected of the right hand side of the Zapruder lens. It's obvious below the sprocket holes and I can even find it on Zfilm with no sprockets. Zapruder is filming BACK at the pergola and the building is on the RIGHT hand side not the left (DAL TEX) as you've stated. It is on the original Zapruder film....do you question the entire Zapruder film as being bogus.

 

Mobile View