Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy  (Read 75971 times)

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Advertisement
Where is the end of the stick located?

OK, let's back up: What is the purpose of the measure in the photo?

More evasion of context. Can't you formulate a question and include what you're getting at?

Why be cryptic?

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Correct

Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken.

They never disappeared because they never existed in the first place. However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:

~snip~

Now, excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.

"Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken."

Right, the POTUS is assassinated.

The fatal wound(s) are to his head.

The missile wound expert at the autopsy requests photos be taken of the fatal wound(s).

The person taking the photos doesn't take the photos?

Come on now, I was born at night, but it wasn't last night.

"They never disappeared because they never existed in the first place."

LOL

"However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:"

So what?

They have nothing to do with the photos Finck had taken of the underlining bone.

They showed the cratering that indicated the direction the bullet came from.

« Last Edit: March 04, 2018, 03:16:08 PM by Gary Craig »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994


Maybe some context and explain what you're getting at?

Sorry that you can't follow, Jerry.  What causes the solid black area at the back of the head (as shown by yellow arrow)?


JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
"Incorrect.He notices that a couple of photos that he recalls asking to be taken were never taken."

Right, the POTUS is assassinated.

The fatal wound(s) are to his head.

The missile wound expert at the autopsy requests photos be taken of the fatal wound(s).


The same missile wound expert who reported that there was only one entry wound in the back of the skull and that the wound was slightly above the EOP and 2.5 cms to the right of the midline. Deal with it.


Quote
"However, here are a couple of photos that were taken:"

So what?

They have nothing to do with the photos Finck had taken of the underlining bone.


They have everything to do with what we were discussing before you decided to divert away.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,233.msg7125.html#msg7125





Excluding the line that has been added to the bottom one, do you accept those two photos as being authentic? Yes or no.



Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Sorry that you can't follow, Jerry.  What causes the solid black area at the back of the head (as shown by yellow arrow)?



The area is oblique and receiving less direct light.

Now what are you getting at?

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Let's back up further...

My question was directed to John Anderson, and you injected yourself claiming the question was stupid obviously without knowing the context, since you have to ask. What a rookie mistake.


Easy enough to click back the links. Your question is just as stupid.

Making something that's simple to begin with into a cryptic conundrum that you then layer on, seems to be your way of making yourself seem "smart" or above it all.

Quote

If the picture is genuine the context should be obvious even to you, so what is the purpose of the ruler?

The ruler in the picture is to measure things. And I'm the rookie? ::)

If there's anything more to it, let's have it. I couldn't crack your cryptic allusions.

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
The area is oblique and receiving less direct light.

Now what are you getting at?
"The area is oblique and receiving less direct light."   :)

Not very good at understanding photos, are you, Jerry.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
"The area is oblique and receiving less direct light."   :)

Not very good at understanding photos, are you, Jerry.

Like I say, Ray, you're getting at something specific with that question. Why not cut to the chase and share it in the original question?