Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy  (Read 75945 times)

Online Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2277
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #208 on: February 26, 2018, 10:19:41 PM »
Advertisement
Brainless question

Brainless when you have no curiosity as to whether Bennett meant below the shoulder line or below the shoulder body mass. And it's brainless when one believes the clothing bunching didn't compromise the level of the wound in the the base of the back of the neck, but instead thinks the clothing on a near flat plane and hanging from a hanger is a better indication of the wound level.

Quote

Why wouldn't he have said below the shoulder body mass?


Because 5 to 6 inches below the shoulder body mass would mean the bullet struck the kidney. But if you're alright with that, then maybe you shouldn't be commenting on the wounds.

Quote

Nice graphics, Jerry. Pity they are immaterial.


No surprise you didn't take anything away from it.

Quote

She was talking about how she saw the body in the car in her WC testimony.


If she mentions seeing the back wound there, let us know.

Quote

Just your opinion.


Sure. Could be other reasons why Bowron got "inspired".

Quote

Another brainless question


Seems pertinent to explore what Hill meant by "about six inches below the neckline".

Quote

You mean the same brainless way you accept the Specter's single bullet theory?


Given that the serious 3D studys and ballistics re-creations (you know, the kind of forensic analysis that critics can't and won't do) tend to support the salient features of the theory, I'm going with that for now.



"Err" Dummkopf can't even figure out how to get the rifle out the window.

Quote

If you can show a good resolution photo of JFK's shirt bunching up whilst he was in the limo,  be my guest.

How we gonna do that, Ray? X-ray specs? The jacket bunch is the only visible indication we have that the clothing was raised up at the nape area. You can figure that one out, can't you?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #208 on: February 26, 2018, 10:19:41 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #209 on: February 26, 2018, 11:26:03 PM »
You kooks keep on ignoring the fact that the Parkland doctors did not see JFK's back and therefore did not see the neck/back entry wound.

Speaking for the doctors now, are you?

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #210 on: February 27, 2018, 05:42:39 AM »
I'm not familiar with Finck's after action report. If photos that he requested be made are not among the existing photos then either the photos were never taken or ,if they were, they never turned out.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #210 on: February 27, 2018, 05:42:39 AM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #211 on: February 27, 2018, 10:20:45 AM »
Brainless when you have no curiosity as to whether Bennett meant below the shoulder line or below the shoulder body mass. And it's brainless when one believes the clothing bunching didn't compromise the level of the wound in the the base of the back of the neck, but instead thinks the clothing on a near flat plane and hanging from a hanger is a better indication of the wound level.

It's a brainless question because we can't ask him what he meant.

Quote

Because 5 to 6 inches below the shoulder body mass would mean the bullet struck the kidney. But if you're alright with that, then maybe you shouldn't be commenting on the wounds.

He said it was 5 to 6inches below the shoulder because that's what he saw. Stop making up stories.
Quote
No surprise you didn't take anything away from it.
Posting immaterial illustrations is your usual MO.
Quote

If she mentions seeing the back wound there, let us know.

If you have read her testimony you know she didn't mention it, because she wasn't asked. Usual rule of questioning by the WC, don't ask a question you don't want the answer to.
Quote
Sure. Could be other reasons why Bowron got "inspired".

So your saying Boron was lying ?
Quote
Seems pertinent to explore what Hill meant by "about six inches below the neckline".

Certainly pertinent if we could ask him but  brainless question because we can't.

Quote

Given that the serious 3D studys and ballistics re-creations (you know, the kind of forensic analysis that critics can't and won't do) tend to support the salient features of the theory,

 "Dale Myers" RONTFLMAO. I'm going with that for now.
Of course you are that's all you have.
Quote



 "Dale Myers" ROTFLMAO.

Quote

"Err" Dummkopf can't even figure out how to get the rifle out the window.

What  on earth are you rambling about now? You been at the Jack Daniels again?

Quote

How we gonna do that, Ray? X-ray specs?
Probably the same way you want answer to the questions about Bennett and Hill. Try a seance.
Quote
The jacket bunch is the only visible indication we have that the clothing was raised up at the nape area. You can figure that one out, can't you?
So  typically of a Felucca you say just because we can't prove the shirt bunched up, means it did, because it must have!

« Last Edit: February 27, 2018, 10:25:53 AM by Ray Mitcham »

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #212 on: February 28, 2018, 06:42:01 AM »

"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing".


Highlight the part of Humes' testimony in which he refers to the existence of a photo that is currently missing.




"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing"

It does mean it's missing when it's followed by:

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that] we don't have."

================================================

Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.


http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

Date: 1-21-67 12:00 Noon

Time: 7 mins 25 secs at the end of a 8 mins 31 secs conversation

Phone Conversation between Acting Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon Johnson
Re: Autopsy Photos

-snip-

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission
that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

-snip-

"It could be contended that that photo could show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the
neck and exited the front part."

-snip-

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that]
we don't have."


-snip-



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #212 on: February 28, 2018, 06:42:01 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #213 on: February 28, 2018, 05:58:13 PM »
You know how stupid that sounds in English?

Not to mention the constant 'yelling'
Can you imagine debating these characters face-to-face?

Some time ago I suggested to Ernie that he write his posts in his native tongue then use Google Translate to produce relatively good English.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #214 on: February 28, 2018, 06:12:18 PM »
Have you posted one piece of evidence since you showed up last month?

The joke on you characters is that Kennedy knew it would be easy to get to him, and the irony is that he used the example of 'a nut in a tall building with a high-powered rifle'

Does that scenario ring a bell, Rob?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #214 on: February 28, 2018, 06:12:18 PM »


Online Steve M. Galbraith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1434
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #215 on: February 28, 2018, 07:06:21 PM »
The joke on you characters is that Kennedy knew it would be easy to get to him, and the irony is that he used the example of 'a nut in a tall building with a high-powered rifle'

Does that scenario ring a bell, Rob?

Well, their conclusion from JFK's comment is that he was obviously in on it too.

Yes, that's tongue in cheek (I guess I had to add that) but this is how they think, how they evaluate evidence. There are no innocent explanations. Not all but unfortunately too many.