Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy  (Read 75979 times)

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #200 on: February 26, 2018, 07:08:04 PM »
Advertisement
Don't tell me he's one of those tits who wants it to be "proven" that the shirt was bunched up.



Nice surname Jerry suits you.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #200 on: February 26, 2018, 07:08:04 PM »


Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #201 on: February 26, 2018, 07:18:21 PM »
I'm guessing they wouldn't have connected the 2 wounds without dissecting the bullet track like the

autopsy Dr.'s did.

And how would seeing the back wound change the appearance of the entrance wound in the front of JFK's

throat?

Exactly Gary.  I notice how no LNer can comment on the missing photo of JFKs upper right lung!!  Because the back shot exting there hit connally.  This complies with the laws of physics and the rounds fired.  There was no entrance wound that could possibly have come out the front of his throat as the throat wound was an entrance wound.

They planted the Parkland bullt before they knew about Tague and messed the whole deal up hence the magic bullet fantasy that the LNers lap up.

Offline Lee Wotton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #202 on: February 26, 2018, 07:26:47 PM »
The shots in no particular order:

- JFK's back passing through right lung and through Connally shattering his wrist - from behind

- JFK's throat entrance with no exit fired from front through windshield

- JFK head shot, hollow tipped round from the front

- Connally's left knee from front ricochet off limo windscreen chrome surround from the front.  Leaves fragments in front footwells of limo and under jump seat.

- Miss from behind hit kerb resulting in debris causing Tagues minor injury

- Plant at Parkland before plotters aware of Tague's injury.

What do you think?  LNers need not apply as I've heard it all before!!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #202 on: February 26, 2018, 07:26:47 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #203 on: February 26, 2018, 09:09:57 PM »

C7 sounds pretty good.


Sounds good to me too. Who could have ever thought that Ray would eventually see the light?

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #204 on: February 26, 2018, 09:16:47 PM »


Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission
that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing".


Quote
"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that]
we don't have."[/i]

Highlight the part of Humes' testimony in which he refers to the existence of a photo that is currently missing.

 
« Last Edit: February 26, 2018, 09:18:32 PM by Tim Nickerson »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #204 on: February 26, 2018, 09:16:47 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #205 on: February 26, 2018, 09:23:44 PM »
Did Connallys acket and shirt temporarily detach from their collars and bunch down?  Maybe a magic jacket and shirt??

Lee, what are you talking about?

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #206 on: February 26, 2018, 09:31:37 PM »
"There may be a photo missing" is not the same thing as "there is a photo missing".


Highlight the part of Humes' testimony in which he refers to the existence of a photo that is currently missing.

 

The document from November 1966 says one thing.

Finck's after action report and Clark's taped phone call from January 1967 say something else.

Finck notes in his after action report that photos of the EOP wound in JFK's head, outside shot and inside

shot, which he requested be made, are not among the autopsy photos.

Odd don't you think that photos of the 2 wounds that were moved around are missing?

But you're Egyptian so that won't matter to you. You spend a lot of time in de-Nile.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #206 on: February 26, 2018, 09:31:37 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #207 on: February 26, 2018, 09:37:59 PM »
The document from November 1966 says one thing.

Finck's after action report and Clark's taped phone call from January 1967 say something else.

Finck notes in his after action report that photos of the EOP wound in JFK's head, outside shot and inside

shot, which he requested be made, are not among the autopsy photos.

Odd don't you think that photos of the 2 wounds that were moved around are missing?

But you're Egyptian so that won't matter to you. You spend a lot of time in de-Nile.

I'm not familiar with Finck's after action report. If photos that he requested be made are not among the existing photos then either the photos were never taken or ,if they were, they never turned out.