Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy

[Tim Nickerson]

Can we get back on topic?

Evidence for the number of shots / bullet strikes which exceed three.  If you disagree, fine, but cite evidence for all evidence of bullet marks, holes and injuries, finds.

Evidence for shots from other than the TSBD or ore than one location in TSBD

Evidence for full metal jacket rounds

Can someone with gun knowledge confirm in an FMJ can be fired from a bolt action rifle as opposed t a military automatic rifle?

Lee, if you really want to get back on topic you can start by properly replying to my original response to your OP.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,233.msg4917.html#msg4917

[Tim Nickerson]

How about this point Timbo, JFK's autopsy was illegal.  His autopsy should have been carried out in Texas by law.  His body was stolen in an armed robbery by the SS.  Why?  So it could be performed by the military with people involved having to obey orders.  I wonder why?

His autopsy was not illegal. The Secret Service officers suspected that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. A conspiracy would have made it a Federal crime. They were justified under Title 18 , Part 1, Chapter 19 of the US Code in removing the body from Dallas.

[Tim Nickerson]

Which set?  The first or second set of x-rays?

Explain what you mean by "first or second set of x-rays".

[Lee Wotton]

His autopsy was not illegal. The Secret Service officers suspected that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. A conspiracy would have made it a Federal crime. They were justified under Title 18 , Part 1, Chapter 19 of the US Code in removing the body from Dallas.

Hahahahaha so a LNer uses a conspiracy when it suits him hahaha

They didn't suspect they knew, they drove him into the ambush, slowed down and removed protection and ignored rules about vehicle speed and high rise buidings with windows open.

Suspicion was not enough t lawfully do what they did that's why they had to threaten and aim to draw weapons

[Lee Wotton]

Lee, if you really want to get back on topic you can start by properly replying to my original response to your OP.

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,233.msg4917.html#msg4917

I've got a better way Tim, ignore your nonsense and discuss with others who can produce evidence and answer questions in the OP

[Royell Storing]

His autopsy was not illegal. The Secret Service officers suspected that the assassination was the result of a conspiracy. A conspiracy would have made it a Federal crime. They were justified under Title 18 , Part 1, Chapter 19 of the US Code in removing the body from Dallas.

 The above is laughable. Unless the assassination occurred inside Germany during Hitler's reign, the SS did Not have the authority to deem themselves Judge/Jury and take possession/steal the body of JFK.

[Tim Nickerson]

And the purpose of that would would be?

The purpose of what? Your question doesn't make sense.

[Tim Nickerson]

Hahahahaha so a LNer uses a conspiracy when it suits him hahaha

They didn't suspect they knew, they drove him into the ambush, slowed down and removed protection and ignored rules about vehicle speed and high rise buidings with windows open.

Suspicion was not enough t lawfully do what they did that's why they had to threaten and aim to draw weapons

You're being idiotic. There wasn't a conspiracy but they didn't know that shortly after 1 pm.