Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy  (Read 70476 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2018, 09:21:22 PM »
Advertisement
Look at my original post and cite some evidence that there were only three bullets from one direction.  Then you can tell me about that new law of Physics you've discovered.

Lee, your original post doesn't actually cite any evidence that there were more than three bullets from more than one direction.

Quote
Only one bullet was attributed to the MC

You apparently are unaware of the two large bullet fragments recovered from the limo that were matched to Oswald's Carcano.

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305150
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305151


Quote
and that was planted at Parkland

Planted by who and when? Why was it planted?

Quote
with no loss of mass that would indicate it hit anything at all. 

That is false. CE-399 was missing about 3 grains of mass.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #24 on: February 11, 2018, 09:21:22 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #25 on: February 11, 2018, 09:27:54 PM »
  Oswald never fired a rifle that day as tests showed

What tests are you referring to? The paraffin tests? Are you aware that the FBI test fired CE139  to see if it would deposit nitrate residue on the cheeks on those who fired it?

 
Quote
and they didn't find his print on the rifle before the chain of evidence was broken.

Wrong. Oswald's palm print was lifted off of the rifle on Nov 22, 1963 by Carl Day.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #26 on: February 11, 2018, 09:29:29 PM »
Lee, your original post doesn't actually cite any evidence that there were more than three bullets from more than one direction.

You apparently are unaware of the two large bullet fragments recovered from the limo that were matched to Oswald's Carcano.

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305150
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305151


Planted by who and when? Why was it planted?

That is false. CE-399 was missing about 3 grains of mass.

You apparently are unaware of the two large bullet fragments recovered from the limo that were matched to Oswald's Carcano.

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305150
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305151

Tim,

When the FBI examined the limo, who actually found there bullet fragments?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #26 on: February 11, 2018, 09:29:29 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #27 on: February 11, 2018, 10:10:07 PM »
You apparently are unaware of the two large bullet fragments recovered from the limo that were matched to Oswald's Carcano.

https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305150
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/305151

Tim,

When the FBI examined the limo, who actually found there bullet fragments?

Martin,

CE-567 was discovered by Thomas G. Mills, Chief Hospital Corpsman, assigned to White House doctor's office.

CE-569 was discovered by Paul Paterni, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7358
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #28 on: February 11, 2018, 10:21:08 PM »

Martin,

CE-567 was discovered by Thomas G. Mills, Chief Hospital Corpsman, assigned to White House doctor's office.

CE-569 was discovered by Paul Paterni, Deputy Chief of the Secret Service.


So, how do we know for certain those fragments came from the limo?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 10:25:23 PM by Martin Weidmann »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #28 on: February 11, 2018, 10:21:08 PM »


Offline Lloyd Morris

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #29 on: February 12, 2018, 01:13:33 AM »
You don't need my permission, if you want to start another thread go ahead.

JohnM

I wasn't asking for your permission, just offering a fresh and uncluttered new thread to established that 95% of the witnesses to the assassination did not say the shots came from the direction of the TSBD as you say they did.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #30 on: February 12, 2018, 01:55:47 AM »
I wasn't asking for your permission, just offering a fresh and uncluttered new thread to established that 95% of the witnesses to the assassination did not say the shots came from the direction of the TSBD as you say they did.


In each collation of all the Dealey Plaza earwitnesses from Conspiracy author through to the HSCA, the results are always the same only a miniscule 3 to 6% of all the earwitnesses heard a crossfire meaning about 95% heard the shots from only one direction and since we know that both Connally and Kennedy were hit from behind therefore ALL the shots came from the rear.









JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #30 on: February 12, 2018, 01:55:47 AM »


Offline Lloyd Morris

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: Forget Oswald and Who....The Number of Bullets & Shooters Proves Conspiracy
« Reply #31 on: February 12, 2018, 02:13:28 AM »
Again John you are incorrect about what the witnesses to the assassination actually heard and saw. I will start a new thread and post the actual witnesses statements made at the time as to what they say they witnessed and will try to get it up tomorrow or the next day.

At that point you can attempt to rebut the actual statements of the witnesses or post more misleading pie charts lacking the actual documented statements to back them up.