Hugh Aynesworth...Solver of the Kennedy Assassination

[Jerry Freeman]

Aynesworth the "lackey" for the official report?  LOL.....

Yak yak---I would say that post was all just so much strawman blab-- but that would be insulting to strawmen everywhere.

While Officer Thomas D. McMillon testified that he heard Ruby say, “You rat son-of-a-bitch, you shot the president,” the television footage clearly showed McMillon far removed and even looking away from the incident.

https://allthatsinteresting.com/jack-ruby
The statement was incorporated into Aynesworth's book anyway....
A book that he decided to write 50 years later for some reason---$$$ perhaps?

[Richard Smith]

Yak yak---I would say that post was all just so much strawman blab-- but that would be insulting to strawmen everywhere. https://allthatsinteresting.com/jack-ruby
The statement was incorporated into Aynesworth's book anyway....
A book that he decided to write 50 years later for some reason---$$$ perhaps?

Try to focus.  I know that is difficult for a kook but give us some explanation for why Aynesworth was a lackey for the "official report" (cue sinister music).  Don't be afraid Jerry.  Give it a shot.  It's your claim.  That Aynesworth lied or made up stuff to implicate Oswald.  So tell us why you think he did that or apologize for defaming him.  Have some guts and at least TRY to defend your nutty baseless claims.  You don't even have to provide any proof.  Just tell us why a random reporter would be untruthful regarding your hero Oswald. 

[Jerry Freeman]

Try to focus.  I know that is difficult for a kook but give us some explanation for why Aynesworth was a lackey for the "official report" (cue sinister music).  Don't be afraid Jerry.  Give it a shot.  It's your claim.  That Aynesworth lied or made up stuff to implicate Oswald.  So tell us why you think he did that or apologize for defaming him.  Have some guts and at least TRY to defend your nutty baseless claims.  You don't even have to provide any proof.  Just tell us why a random reporter would be untruthful regarding your hero Oswald.

Go re-read the thread and then blow up your date for tonight--- LOL

[John Iacoletti]

More incoherent nonsense but still no explanation for why Aynesworth was a "lackey" for the official report.  Another mystery for us to ponder like why a random shoe salesman, Quaker housewife, cab driver, and many others were out to link Oswald to the crime.  It is just so.

Uh, “Richard”.....

The random shoe salesman, Quaker housewife, and cab driver witnessed no crime.

[Bill Chapman]

@CT StrawGraspers

From the Annals of Conspiracy-Monger Pulp Fiction:
> 42(ish) shooters
> 84(ish) groups
> 213(ish) participants

Easy to write a book and not have to prove anything

[John Iacoletti]

@CT StrawGraspers

From the Annals of Conspiracy-Monger Pulp Fiction:
> 42 shooters
> 84 groups
> 213 participants

(ish)

More nonsense Bugliosi rhetoric from the master of cut-and-paste without attribution.

[Bill Chapman]

Being There: Oswald @Tippit
Sticks to him like ugly on a moose

Brewer and others were just observers along the way as the little prick passed through their lives, however briefly.

Brewer: Saw/Said what he saw.
Quaker Ruth: Saw the uninvited Oswald at her home on the eve of the assassination where there was a rifle, and then there wasn't.

Both contributed. Can't see why they would need to see a crime being committed in order to simply report what they saw. They were just part of Oswald's baggage along the way to his becoming a somebody.