Remember that when asked why he thought John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln our dishonest contrarian cited - wait for it - Booth's handwritten diary! LOL. I guess handwriting analysis is only "unscientific" when it goes against the desired outcome. The game here is to conjure up fake doubt of any evidence that lends itself towards Oswald's guilt. And the last desperation move in that game is always to claim the investigators are suspect which means nothing can ever be proven. False doubt is the inevitable result of the application of an impossible standard of proof.
Richard,
Great post.
The way I see it, Iacoletti is wittingly or unwittingly carrying on the KGB-approved and subsidized tradition, established by Mark Lane, of casting unwarranted doubt on most if not all of the evidence.
Vladimir Putin loves John (and his ilk) for all the chaos, confusion and doubt he creates regarding the JFK Assassination, and all of the aspersions he casts on the evil, evil FBI and the evil, evil, evil CIA.
And this from a dude who can't tell women from men in the Towner film!
LOL
-- MWT
JFK Assassination Forum
