Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument  (Read 816 times)

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2489
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2019, 03:28:44 AM »
Exactly right. Which is why unscientific and biased handwriting “analysis” of 2 block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order coupon from microfilm that is now “missing” is not a reliable indicator of who placed an order.

John,

What makes you think it was unscientific?

Because the results weren't what you hoping for?

If the results had been "probably not Oswald," would you have been happy with that?

--  MWT  ;)

PS  Why the quotation marks around missing?

Do you think it was intentionally lost by the evil, evil Deep State?
« Last Edit: December 03, 2019, 04:55:37 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #20 on: December 02, 2019, 03:28:44 AM »

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #21 on: December 02, 2019, 05:34:33 AM »
Is that an example of your "epistemology," Iacoletti?

No, it’s an example of what you do every day on this forum.

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #22 on: December 02, 2019, 05:43:09 AM »
Another reason why “FBI said so” is not a good argument:

https://forejustice.org/wc/mayfield/jd/brandon_mayfield_jd_issue25.htm

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #22 on: December 02, 2019, 05:43:09 AM »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2489
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #23 on: December 02, 2019, 05:48:21 AM »
No, it’s an example of what you do every day on this forum.

How large was the conspiracy, John?

--  MWT  ;)

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #24 on: December 02, 2019, 05:53:34 AM »
How large was the conspiracy, John?

How large was the stick you used to beat your wife, Thomas?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #24 on: December 02, 2019, 05:53:34 AM »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2489
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #25 on: December 02, 2019, 06:22:12 AM »
How large was the stick you used to beat your wife, Thomas?

That big, huh?

What "turned you on" to the assassination, John?

Oliver "I Like KGB-Boy Vladimir Putin And My Son Works For RT" Stone's JFK?

--  MWT  ;)

« Last Edit: December 02, 2019, 06:23:58 AM by Thomas Graves »

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 817
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2019, 02:14:49 PM »
John,

What makes you think it was unscientific?

Because the results weren't what you hoping for?

If the results had been "probably not Oswald," would you have been happy with that?

--  MWT  ;)

PS  "Missing" like the "DNC's server in corrupt, fascistic/communistic Ukraine," or just ... missing?

Remember that when asked why he thought John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln our dishonest contrarian cited - wait for it - Booth's handwritten diary!  LOL.  I guess handwriting analysis is only "unscientific" when it goes against the desired outcome.   The game here is to conjure up fake doubt of any evidence that lends itself towards Oswald's guilt.  And the last desperation move in that game is always to claim the investigators are suspect which means nothing can ever be proven.  False doubt is the inevitable result of the application of an impossible standard of proof.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #26 on: December 03, 2019, 02:14:49 PM »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2489
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2019, 04:25:12 PM »
Quote from: Richard Smith 8link=topic=2322.msg69787#msg69787 date=1575382489
Remember that when asked why he thought John Wilkes Booth assassinated Lincoln our dishonest contrarian cited - wait for it - Booth's handwritten diary!  LOL.  I guess handwriting analysis is only "unscientific" when it goes against the desired outcome.   The game here is to conjure up fake doubt of any evidence that lends itself towards Oswald's guilt.  And the last desperation move in that game is always to claim the investigators are suspect which means nothing can ever be proven.  False doubt is the inevitable result of the application of an impossible standard of proof.

Richard,

Great post.

The way I see it, Iacoletti is wittingly or unwittingly carrying on the KGB-approved and subsidized tradition, established by Mark Lane, of casting unwarranted doubt on most if not all of the evidence.

Vladimir Putin loves John (and his ilk) for all the chaos, confusion and doubt he creates regarding the JFK Assassination, and all of the aspersions he casts on the evil, evil FBI and the evil, evil, evil CIA.

And this from a dude who can't tell women from men in the Towner film!

LOL

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: December 03, 2019, 04:33:14 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #27 on: December 03, 2019, 04:25:12 PM »

Offline Michael Walton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 244
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #28 on: December 03, 2019, 04:36:48 PM »
So I guess they got this wrong as well. Even though the mark on the FBI stand-in matches almost exactly with the back wound:



But of course every single time I bring this up, the FBI Fan Boys on here will throw shade on it (as in obfuscate) by babbling about the jacket being bunched up and all other BS.

Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
    • Zapruder Frames
Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #29 on: December 03, 2019, 05:07:52 PM »
So I guess they got this wrong as well. Even though the mark on the FBI stand-in matches almost exactly with the back wound:



But of course every single time I bring this up, the FBI Fan Boys on here will throw shade on it (as in obfuscate) by babbling about the jacket being bunched up and all other BS.

What's supposed to be "wrong" with the re-enactment?

Why are you showing an autopsy photo? Be specific.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: This is why “FBI said so” is not a good argument
« Reply #29 on: December 03, 2019, 05:07:52 PM »

 

Mobile View