The burden is with you LNers to prove Oswald's guilt;
Who contests it? Loons, Smart Alecks with impossible standards of proof, soulless trolls. Delusional conspiracy theorists who figure they have no burden of proof.
innocent until proven guilty, not the other way round. How's that worked out for you the last 56 years?
Worked out fine. For reasonable people. Why do people get arrested if they're "innocent until proven guilty"?
The HSCA deemed this likely a conspiracy and Oswald was not a lone nut assassin, which implied the WCR was likely a cover up.
Cover-up; I don't believe so. And many Panel members had dissenting remarks about the "probable conspiracy" finding. Also the cornerstone evidence of acoustics went from 95-percent probability to a whole lot less. The Committee determined the core medical/forensic evidence showed Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade from above and behind.
I thought a half century and releasing the JFK files should be enough to convict Oswald as a LN assassin, if he actually was one. Mooo, where's the beef?
No, the thought was that the files were restricted because they contained huge amounts of evidence of conspiracy. That critics would achieve vindication. How did that turn out?