Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof

[Steve Barber]

Great, let’s post a hundred threads then, all stating that you all haven’t been able to prove in the last 56 years that Oswald did it. Because, you know repetition is awesome.

  What's the difference?  You people have been posting  hundreds of posts of the same tripe for 56 years claiming there's a conspiracy, a second gunman, etc. without one shred of evidence that Oswald didn't do it!   "Repetition is awesome" works both ways.  It most definitely is not limited to those who believe Oswald is the lone assassin.  The conspiracy books contain the same thing. Rubbish.

[John Iacoletti]

  What's the difference?  You people have been posting  hundreds of posts of the same tripe for 56 years claiming there's a conspiracy, a second gunman, etc. without one shred of evidence that Oswald didn't do it!

Therefore Oswald did it by default? Is that how it works?

[Steve Barber]

Therefore Oswald did it by default? Is that how it works?

Therefore, Oswald didn't do it by default (Oswald apologists).  Is that how it works?

[Joe Mannix]

Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?

[Jerry Freeman]

Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?

He had to.

[Jack Trojan]

Therefore, Oswald didn't do it by default (Oswald apologists).  Is that how it works?

The burden is with you LNers to prove Oswald's guilt; innocent until proven guilty, not the other way round. How's that worked out for you the last 56 years? The HSCA deemed this likely a conspiracy and Oswald was not a lone nut assassin, which implied the WCR was likely a cover up.

I thought a half century and releasing the JFK files should be enough to convict Oswald as a LN assassin, if he actually was one. Mooo, where's the beef?

[Jack Trojan]

Who contests it? Loons, Smart Alecks with impossible standards of proof, soulless trolls. Delusional conspiracy theorists who figure they have no burden of proof.

LOL. A loon says what?

Worked out fine. For reasonable people. Why do people get arrested if they're "innocent until proven guilty"?

Reasonable people. Are you suggesting by virtue of being arrested proves your guilt?

Cover-up; I don't believe so. And many Panel members had dissenting remarks about the "probable conspiracy" finding. Also the cornerstone evidence of acoustics went from 95-percent probability to a whole lot less. The Committee determined the core medical/forensic evidence showed Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade from above and behind.

The Committee could not tie Oswald to anything because the FBI and DPD totally screwed up Oswald's sheep-dipping by not getting his prints on items he supposed manhandled, such as the guns and bag. They also didn't sight-in his rifle scope, they planted a pristine bullet on the wrong stretcher, they used a frangible bullet for the kill shot when it was supposed to be a FMJ bullet. And don't get me started on the back yard photos unless you want me to expose your total lack of photo analysis skills and school you on how it's actually done. 

No, the thought was that the files were restricted because they contained huge amounts of evidence of conspiracy. That critics would achieve vindication. How did that turn out?

Whose thought, yours? Why would anyone think there would be reams of files documenting the conspiracy? How stupid do you think they were? Only the last few files currently being held back, for "national security" reasons, whatever that means might contain a hint or 2. You should ask William Barr about those files. He was the one who deep-sixed all the JFK files related to GHWB and the conspiracy. Barr was a WH lawyer at the time and knows where all the files and bodies are buried...and maybe JFK's brain.

[Tim Nickerson]

Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?

He didn't. He never moved the wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.