Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Fifty Six Years Later, and Still The Oswald Apologists Have No Conspiracy Proof  (Read 401 times)

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6769
  What's the difference?  You people have been posting  hundreds of posts of the same tripe for 56 years claiming there's a conspiracy, a second gunman, etc. without one shred of evidence that Oswald didn't do it!

Therefore Oswald did it by default? Is that how it works?

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Steve Barber

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 191
Therefore Oswald did it by default? Is that how it works?

Therefore, Oswald didn't do it by default (Oswald apologists).  Is that how it works?

Online Joe Mannix

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 38
Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1796
Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?
He had to.

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
Therefore, Oswald didn't do it by default (Oswald apologists).  Is that how it works?

The burden is with you LNers to prove Oswald's guilt; innocent until proven guilty, not the other way round. How's that worked out for you the last 56 years? The HSCA deemed this likely a conspiracy and Oswald was not a lone nut assassin, which implied the WCR was likely a cover up.

I thought a half century and releasing the JFK files should be enough to convict Oswald as a LN assassin, if he actually was one. Mooo, where's the beef?

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
    • Zapruder Frames
The burden is with you LNers to prove Oswald's guilt;

Who contests it? Loons, Smart Alecks with impossible standards of proof, soulless trolls. Delusional conspiracy theorists who figure they have no burden of proof.

Quote
innocent until proven guilty, not the other way round. How's that worked out for you the last 56 years?

Worked out fine. For reasonable people. Why do people get arrested if they're "innocent until proven guilty"?

Quote
The HSCA deemed this likely a conspiracy and Oswald was not a lone nut assassin, which implied the WCR was likely a cover up.

Cover-up; I don't believe so. And many Panel members had dissenting remarks about the "probable conspiracy" finding. Also the cornerstone evidence of acoustics went from 95-percent probability to a whole lot less. The Committee determined the core medical/forensic evidence showed Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade from above and behind.

Quote
I thought a half century and releasing the JFK files should be enough to convict Oswald as a LN assassin, if he actually was one. Mooo, where's the beef?

No, the thought was that the files were restricted because they contained huge amounts of evidence of conspiracy. That critics would achieve vindication. How did that turn out?

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
Who contests it? Loons, Smart Alecks with impossible standards of proof, soulless trolls. Delusional conspiracy theorists who figure they have no burden of proof.

LOL. A loon says what?

Quote
Worked out fine. For reasonable people. Why do people get arrested if they're "innocent until proven guilty"?

Reasonable people. :D Are you suggesting by virtue of being arrested proves your guilt?

Quote
Cover-up; I don't believe so. And many Panel members had dissenting remarks about the "probable conspiracy" finding. Also the cornerstone evidence of acoustics went from 95-percent probability to a whole lot less. The Committee determined the core medical/forensic evidence showed Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade from above and behind.

The Committee could not tie Oswald to anything because the FBI and DPD totally screwed up Oswald's sheep-dipping by not getting his prints on items he supposed manhandled, such as the guns and bag. They also didn't sight-in his rifle scope, they planted a pristine bullet on the wrong stretcher, they used a frangible bullet for the kill shot when it was supposed to be a FMJ bullet. And don't get me started on the back yard photos unless you want me to expose your total lack of photo analysis skills and school you on how it's actually done.  :-*

Quote
No, the thought was that the files were restricted because they contained huge amounts of evidence of conspiracy. That critics would achieve vindication. How did that turn out?

Whose thought, yours? Why would anyone think there would be reams of files documenting the conspiracy? How stupid do you think they were? Only the last few files currently being held back, for "national security" reasons, whatever that means might contain a hint or 2. You should ask William Barr about those files. He was the one who deep-sixed all the JFK files related to GHWB and the conspiracy. Barr was a WH lawyer at the time and knows where all the files and bodies are buried...and maybe JFK's brain.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Jerry Organ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 717
    • Zapruder Frames
LOL. A loon says what?

Reasonable people. :D Are you suggesting by virtue of being arrested proves your guilt?

If you're "innocent until proven guilty" how can you possibly be arrested?

Quote
The Committee could not tie Oswald to anything because the FBI and DPD totally screwed up Oswald's sheep-dipping by not getting his prints on items he supposed manhandled, such as the guns and bag.

The Committee concluded Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade, including the two that struck him. Based on evidence from the FBI and DPD, and others.

Quote
They also didn't sight-in his rifle scope, they planted a pristine bullet on the wrong stretcher, they used a frangible bullet for the kill shot when it was supposed to be a FMJ bullet.

Easy to claim, I suppose, considering you've absolved yourself of any burden of proof.

Quote
And don't get me started on the back yard photos unless you want me to expose your total lack of photo analysis skills and school you on how it's actually done.  :-*

Like the "autopsy haircut"? Working at Foto Hut didn't teach you anything.

Quote
Whose thought, yours? Why would anyone think there would be reams of files documenting the conspiracy? How stupid do you think they were?

LNers didn't claim the files held "smoking guns". CTs did. They were beside themselves trying to get them released.

Quote
Only the last few files currently being held back, for "national security" reasons, whatever that means might contain a hint or 2.

True to form. The clamor to get at the files and their importance will intensify the longer they're withheld.

Quote
You should ask William Barr about those files. He was the one who deep-sixed all the JFK files related to GHWB and the conspiracy. Barr was a WH lawyer at the time and knows where all the files and bodies are buried...and maybe JFK's brain.

That's how a guy like Trump gets in. Too much distraction from JFK kooks and other fringe conspiracy groups. Probably why the Enquirer publishes JFK nonsense.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1441
Why did Jerry Ford move an entry wound location?

He didn't. He never moved the wound by even as much as a mm in any direction.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1790
If you're "innocent until proven guilty" how can you possibly be arrested?

The Committee concluded Oswald fired three shots at the motorcade, including the two that struck him. Based on evidence from the FBI and DPD, and others.

Easy to claim, I suppose, considering you've absolved yourself of any burden of proof.

Like the "autopsy haircut"? Working at Foto Hut didn't teach you anything.

LNers didn't claim the files held "smoking guns". CTs did. They were beside themselves trying to get them released.

True to form. The clamor to get at the files and their importance will intensify the longer they're withheld.

That's how a guy like Trump gets in. Too much distraction from JFK kooks and other fringe conspiracy groups. Probably why the Enquirer publishes JFK nonsense.

If you're "innocent until proven guilty" how can you possibly be arrested?

So, everybody that gets arrested is automatically guilty?

Or could it be that people suspected of having committed a crime get arrested with their guilt having to be determined at trial?


JFK Assassination Forum


 

Mobile View