The "smirk"

[Charles Collins]

I understand your argument, but that’s not evidence that Tatum was actually there.

Yes, it is. It may not be conclusive. But it is evidence nonetheless.

[John Iacoletti]

Yes, it is. It may not be conclusive. But it is evidence nonetheless.

Claims aren’t evidence. Anybody can claim anything they want to.

[Charles Collins]

Claims aren’t evidence. Anybody can claim anything they want to.

A pertinent claim can be used for evidence. If LHO had lived and gone to trial, some of his claims (ones that the prosecution believed that they had adequate evidence to show them as lies) could have been used against him as evidence of guilt.

[Bill Chapman]

You supposedly screenshotted it. Read the damn thing.

You’ve been taking religious swipes at me for months, ever since you discovered TAE. You’ve called me a heathen, and a devil- worshipper, and made false accusations about things I have said there, and falsely claimed that I was “kicked out”. None of which has anything to do with the JFK assassination.

So stop whining and get the halo off your head — it doesn’t suit you.

And yes, it’s no secret that churches, particularly the Catholic Church, enable and cover up child abuse. Maybe your ire should be directed towards them.

You still haven't posted my 'initial attack'
Instead you deflect to another grievance
It seems you're the one doing whining here.

And you are no longer with TAE last time I looked.
And point out any misquotes by me
And since when can't I voice my opinion about atheists?
Or joke about them? AtheistTV snickers and puts down callers all the time,
taking advantage of those who aren't particularly well-spoken or all that bright.

Boo-hoo. Too bad not everyone agrees with you, huh?
Same attitude you show here.. that's the connection I made.

You attempted to depict me as an apologist for child molesters.
My ire is directed at you, and for good reason.

Edited @2:40pm EST

[Charles Collins]

You still haven't posted my 'initial attack'
Instead you deflect to another grievance
It seems you're the one doing whining here.

And you are no longer with TAE last time I looked.
And point out any misquotes by me
And since when can't I voice my opinion about atheists?
Or joke about them? AtheistTV snickers and puts down callers all the time,
taking advantage of those who aren't particularly well-spoken or all that bright.

Boo-hoo. Too bad not everyone agrees with you, huh?
Same attitude you show here.. that's the connection I made.

You attempted to depict me as an apologist for child molesters.
My ire is directed at you, and for good reason.

Okay Bill and John. I am going to ask politely for you two to take this discussion to another thread. It is irrelevant to this one. Thanks.

[Bill Chapman]

Okay Bill and John. I am going to ask politely for you two to take this discussion to another thread. It is irrelevant to this one. Thanks.

Ok Charles... I was just thinking that myself and that I didn't want to cause a problem for you
But I doubt if I will start a thread on my issue since Duncan has already made it clear that using 'child molester' in an attack is verboten hereabouts

My apologies

[Bill Chapman]

Claims aren’t evidence. Anybody can claim anything they want to.

As multiple conspiracy-monger books do, and as plenty of CT crackpots do around here.

[John Iacoletti]

You still haven't posted my 'initial attack'

Read your damn screenshot. You asked me what “atheist heathens” think about the conspiracy. Why did you feel the need to inject a religious slur into a discussion about Oswald’s “smirk”?

Why do you get to make religious slurs and it’s just “voicing your opinion”, but when you get it back you cry about it? Because you’re a raging hypocrite.  Lie in the bed you made.

And you are no longer with TAE last time I looked.
And point out any misquotes by me
And since when can't I voice my opinion about atheists?
Or joke about them? AtheistTV snickers and puts down callers all the time,
taking advantage of those who aren't particularly well-spoken or all that bright.

Boo-hoo. Too bad not everyone agrees with you, huh?
Same attitude you show here.. that's the connection I made.

You can’t seem to get anything right on any subject.

Atheist TV and TAE are two completely different things. Cite me ever “snickering and putting down” a caller, or “taking advantage of those who aren’t particularly well-spoken or all that bright” (are you talking about yourself?). Taking advantage how?

When have I ever cared if you or anyone else agrees with me? Because I dispute claims made about the case that this forum was set up to discuss? If disagreement is so offensive to you then why are you here? To post movie clips and make “clever” irrelevant quips and slurs?