Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.  (Read 3927 times)

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1151
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2019, 09:32:05 PM »
Agreed, Kennedy had longer hair on top, which is just wet in the back of head shot, I think it's been so long since these guys have had hair they forget what happens when it gets wet..
And it seems that the photos either represent one man with a haircut or two dead men, why use two men, WHY?

JohnM

Wet hair somehow shortens it?  Have another look then fade away gracefully. You lose, loser. :D

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4840
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #21 on: November 22, 2019, 10:01:23 PM »
Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy, so far it could be The Dallas Police or Hoover or The CIA or some sort of rogue element or the military or basically anybody but Oswald, but why is no one bright enough to figure this out, surely with the thousands of enthusiasts someone has to stumble into some solid evidence, where is it?
Why has nobody even come close to exposing any conspiracy, is it because it was Oswald and all the evidence just fits?
Anyway, if someone knows something and can back this up with proof then let's hear it, or otherwise your time is running out and I'm afraid without some decent evidence history will forever find Oswald guilty of killing two men. That's just how it works.

JohnM

Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy,

If you don't know...It's because you don't want to know...      There's a mountain of evidence that illuminates the truth, but you prefer to remain in the dark.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2627
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #22 on: November 22, 2019, 10:02:35 PM »
Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy,

If you don't know...It's because you don't want to know...      There's a mountain of evidence that illuminates the truth, but you prefer to remain in the dark.

Awesome finally someone who knows, who did it and why?

JohnM

Offline Patrick Jackson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #23 on: November 22, 2019, 10:43:41 PM »
56 years ago, "Caroline" plane landed on a small airfield in Florida. He spent the rest of his life in the Winter White House, fighting with all his illneses, suraunded by his family.

56 years later Oswald deserves new investigation.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2019, 02:18:59 AM by Patrick Jackson »

Online Paul May

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 628
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #24 on: November 23, 2019, 12:31:36 AM »
My friend Gary Mack often said ď there may have been a conspiracy to kill JFK but I canít prove it nor can anybody elseĒ. Truer than ever 56 years later.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2556
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #25 on: November 23, 2019, 04:06:57 AM »
Quote
56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
The proof lies in everybody's lies.

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #26 on: November 23, 2019, 04:33:57 AM »
Here we are 56 years later and we still have no idea who was behind the conspiracy, so far it could be The Dallas Police or Hoover or The CIA or some sort of rogue element or the military or basically anybody but Oswald, but why is no one bright enough to figure this out, surely with the thousands of enthusiasts someone has to stumble into some solid evidence, where is it?
Why has nobody even come close to exposing any conspiracy, is it because it was Oswald and all the evidence just fits?
Anyway, if someone knows something and can back this up with proof then let's hear it, or otherwise your time is running out and I'm afraid without some decent evidence history will forever find Oswald guilty of killing two men. That's just how it works.

JohnM



https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-one-thing-in-politics-most-americans-believe-in-jfk-conspiracies/

Seems not a great change over the generations. 56 years and still about 2:1 that donít accept the WC narrative. who will eventually prevail, HSCA or WC?

I feel your frustration.
« Last Edit: November 23, 2019, 04:35:44 AM by Colin Crow »

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #27 on: November 23, 2019, 07:43:32 AM »
But...... but........ haven't you been listening to Judyth Scary Faker

Donations to the Forum can be made via Paypal using the links below.

   
   

and her Conventioneers?  Surely all of them can't be wrong.....  I wonder if she went to Groden's wedding?   LOL !!!!


Ha.  That's some crazy stuff.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1058
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #28 on: November 23, 2019, 07:46:23 AM »
Oswald: I'm innocent.
JudgeJohnny: Okay, you can go, my darling.
Oswald: Well, that's it... it's all over now.

LOL

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2627
Re: 56 years later and still no proof of a conspiracy.
« Reply #29 on: November 23, 2019, 08:21:37 AM »

Seems not a great change over the generations. 56 years and still about 2:1 that donít accept the WC narrative. who will eventually prevail, HSCA or WC?

I feel your frustration.

C'mon Colin, it's a poll asking the general population what they believe, what do they know? In fact I reckon half of this Forum doesn't have a clue about the evidence.

12 average people heard the evidence in the London Trial and they found Oswald guilty. Gerry Spence put up a good fight and was very very good and he used the "We just don't know what happened" defence, the same defence it seems being used by the majority of CT's and this is why it doesn't work, people want a narrative and they want a bad guy but the JFK CT's are far too scattered hence the broad Gerry Spence defence which was his downfall.


JohnM

 

Mobile View