Back to the movies with Julia Postal

[Ted Shields]

A bus transfer in pristine condition ( nor wrinkled or rumpled from being in the pocket of a shirt that was stretched and torn by the police when they dragged Lee from the theater )  is not very convincing evidence that Lee Oswald was aboard Mc Watter's bus.....  Mc Watter's himself said that he was mistaken about the identity of the young man who was on his bus.

Explain to me the logic and benefit of faking that he was on the bus?

[Walt Cakebread]

People who did not follow the game plan would soon find out that they should tell the story that fit the script or they would possibly be lacking enough oxygen to maintain life . Look what they did to those who wanted to buck the system and tell what they actually saw . Domingo Benavides , Dallas Drs. and especially Roger Craig !

Look what they did to those who wanted to buck the system and tell what they actually saw . Domingo Benavides , Dallas Drs. and especially Roger Craig !

You've overlooked the most graphic demonstration for those who had witnessed something that contradicted the official tale...  The lynching of Lee Oswald on live television, while in the "custody" of the the Dallas Police. That demonstration convinced many witnesses to keep their mouths shut.

 Howard Brennan saw the murder of a man (Lee Oswald) that he had told the police was NOT the 175 pound man who was dressed in light colored Khaki clothing that he had seen aiming a rifle out of a TSBD window.  When Brennan saw the murder of Lee Oswald on TV he knew that he had better not buck the authorities.

[Bill Chapman]

People who did not follow the game plan would soon find out that they should tell the story that fit the script or they would possibly be lacking enough oxygen to maintain life . Look what they did to those who wanted to buck the system and tell what they actually saw . Domingo Benavides , Dallas Drs. and especially Roger Craig !

Tell us why you enter a space between punctuation marks and the words they follow.

[Walt Cakebread]

Explain to me the logic and benefit of faking that he was on the bus?

The plot that Lee was involved in used the same basic MO that he had used at Walker's house in April of 63.   The bullet through the window was intended to by graphic evidence that he had tried to kill Walker, although commonsense would tell any intelligent person that if he had intended to KILL walker he could very easily have done that by simply firing a couple more shots ( The liars have said that he fired three shots in six seconds during the ambush of JFK)   He had no intention of killing Walker.and the same is true of JFK.    He was involved in a hoax that was intended to make it appear that he had shot at JFK.     He was working with "FBI men"  who he trusted, but those "FBI men" were merely playing him for a sucker ( patsy)   

Back in the early 60's American Motors (AMC) had hugh contracts with the US Government to produce vehicles for the government.  AMC produced  thousands of  AMC Ramblers for ol Unca Sam.    They were all painted a light pastel green....   Those Ramblers went into government motor pools all over the world......Any US Government agency could use those cars.....   I believe that the light colored Rambler that Roger Craig saw pick up a young man who looked like Lee Oswald was probably on loan to the "FBI men" who were setting Lee up ........  Naturally Lee wouldn't want to spill the beans and announce that he was involved in a hoax, with some FBI men,  that was designed to get him welcomed to Castro's Cuba.  And It was an FBI Rambler that had picked him up  in front of the GK in Dealy Plaza.

[Ted Shields]

The plot that Lee was involved in used the same basic MO that he had used at Walker's house in April of 63.   The bullet through the window was intended to by graphic evidence that he had tried to kill Walker, although commonsense would tell any intelligent person that if he had intended to KILL walker he could very easily have done that by simply firing a couple more shots ( The liars have said that he fired three shots in six seconds during the ambush of JFK)   He had no intention of killing Walker.and the same is true of JFK.    He was involved in a hoax that was intended to make it appear that he had shot at JFK.     He was working with "FBI men"  who he trusted, but those "FBI men" were merely playing him for a sucker ( patsy)   

Back in the early 60's American Motors (AMC) had hugh contracts with the US Government to produce vehicles for the government.  AMC produced  thousands of  AMC Ramblers for ol Unca Sam.    They were all painted a light pastel green....   Those Ramblers went into government motor pools all over the world......Any US Government agency could use those cars.....   I believe that the light colored Rambler that Roger Craig saw pick up a young man who looked like Lee Oswald was probably on loan to the "FBI men" who were setting Lee up ........  Naturally Lee wouldn't want to spill the beans and announce that he was involved in a hoax, with some FBI men,  that was designed to get him welcomed to Castro's Cuba.  And It was an FBI Rambler that had picked him up  in front of the GK in Dealy Plaza.

OK. Theres no evidence for this apart from Roger Craig. Who is a dubious witness at best.

That doesn't explain the logic in faking him getting on the bus, off the bus, and having the bus transfer in his pocket. Which the cops presumably stuffed into his pocket without him knowing? Which he then didn't deny.

So now we have a dated bus transfer with a distinctive punchmark, conclusively linked to that driver, and a landlady who are in on it too? Maybe the bus company aswell? Why? Him being or not being on the bus doesn't prove or disprove anything.

[Bill Chapman]

He had the bus transfer in his pocket. He was on the bus.

What was he doing on the bus 10 minutes after the president was shot outside of his building? Why didn't he wait around for his ride home with Frazier?

He had a curtain-rod fitting to take of elsewhere, followed by what he thought was a free movie.

[Walt Cakebread]

OK. Theres no evidence for this apart from Roger Craig. Who is a dubious witness at best.

That doesn't explain the logic in faking him getting on the bus, off the bus, and having the bus transfer in his pocket. Which the cops presumably stuffed into his pocket without him knowing? Which he then didn't deny.

So now we have a dated bus transfer with a distinctive punchmark, conclusively linked to that driver, and a landlady who are in on it too? Maybe the bus company aswell? Why? Him being or not being on the bus doesn't prove or disprove anything.

OK. Theres no evidence for this apart from Roger Craig. Who is a dubious witness at best.

There are several corroborating accounts, and photographs,  that a light colored Rambler picked up a young man who looked like Lee Oswald.

So now we have a dated bus transfer with a distinctive punchmark, conclusively linked to that driver,

What does that prove??...  The FACT that the transfer is in pristine condition tells us that it was NOT in Lee's shirt pocket at the Texas Theater.  And although I haven't measured the reansfer....I believe it would have protruded out of the shirt pocket and been visible if it had been in his pocket at the theater.

That transfer could very easily have been produced while Mc Watter's was being questioned at the DPD .   

Mr Shields I'm not going to take your hand and lead you along....  I'll give you information and you'll have to assimilate it....

[Jerry Freeman]

Tell us why you enter a space between punctuation marks and the words they follow.

Tell us why you're here.