Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?  (Read 6773 times)

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1147
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #10 on: October 23, 2019, 04:06:25 PM »
:D

Mr Scully doesn't want Mr Oswald's alibi to be established because no glory would accrue to Mr Scully from that... Pure narcissism!

Sigh.....
Quote
point·less/ˈpoin(t)ləs/
1. having little or no sense, use, or purpose.
"speculating like this is a pointless exercise"

https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=39&relPageId=233&search="saw_mr.%20truly"%20and%20oswald


Alan, sitting on a bed in my Mom's basement, "armed" only with a keyboard and clad in my pee-jays, singlehandedly I caused the deposition described below to happen. (My research is credited in several books; two examples... "A Secret Order: Investigating the High Strangeness and Synchronicity in the" ...By H. Albarelli, Jr. click link and
"Our Man in Haiti:" ...By Joan Mellen click link ...)

You'll just have to trust me, (I expect it won't be easy for you to do that) threads such as this one, "Those Front Steps", "Mrs. Robert Reid," "Sarah Stanton," "Wiping Down my Weapon Quickly," "SS Agent Lied About Curtain Rods In Mrs. Paine's Garage," are pointless chat fests. Those lacking the discernment to anticipate what is obviously a waste of their time will continue to waste their time and create additional, counterproductive distraction.

Quote
Mary's Mosaic: The CIA Conspiracy to Murder John F. Kennedy, ...
https://books.google.com...
Peter Janney - 2016

The CIA Conspiracy to Murder John F. Kennedy, Mary Pinchot Meyer, and Their Vision for World Peace: Third Edition Peter Janney ... Before the first edition of Mary's Mosaic was published in April 2012, I had concluded that Lt. Mitchell was likely no longer living, or that his name ... The arrival of William Lockwood Mitchell (aka “Bill Mitchell”) and his attorney Garet O'Keefe at the deposition proceedings in ...
"No longer living," contradicted by one of author Janney's cited "intelligence" sources, a year later!
Quote
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=19016&p=275187
Hank Albarelli, on 29 May 2013 - 07:37 AM, said:

...I have not read it. [My source knew Mr. Mitchell quite well and indeed still communicates and occasionally visits with him; that I passed this on to peter was entirely appropriate.} There is far more to the Mary M. story than has been released thus far. I expect that will come out soon. If Tom has info he should it out in the proper places. [Few read this forum.]...
« Last Edit: October 23, 2019, 04:27:07 PM by Tom Scully »

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3974
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #11 on: October 23, 2019, 04:07:42 PM »
Mr Mitcham was quite right to ask the question! And the answer to your question, Mr Freeman, is yes-------the lunchroom encounter story was contrived.

Mr Oswald, we now know, actually told Captain Fritz he had visited the second-floor lunchroom for a coke before the assassination and then went back down to the first floor to eat his lunch... and then 'went outside to watch P. parade'. Captain Fritz & co. kept these explosive claims a secret----------and the truth only came out very recently. when Agent Hosty's notes were unearthed!

Officer Baker encountered Mr Oswald at the front entrance to the building. He needed to know if Mr Oswald was an employee so he could show him the way to the stairs. Mr Truly then intervened and offered to escort Officer Baker.

There may have been no 'man walking away from the stairway' on the 'third or fourth floor'------------Officer Baker may have been told 'We have the assassin, he worked in the building, we need you to add him to your story'.

And then----------while Officer Baker is giving his affidavit statement based on a suspect description handed to him----------who is brought in past him only the guy he ran into at the front door!!

Does Officer Baker's affidavit note that the man in handcuffs was the man on the third or fourth floor? No.
Does Officer Baker identify Mr Oswald in a subsequent lineup as the man on the third or fourth floor? No.

Most likely Officer Baker agreed to invent an encounter with an employee by the back stairs up a few floors, but----------when he found out that the employee being accused of shooting JFK was an employee who couldn't possibly have been up on the sixth floor at the time-----------he was stunned. It would explain why he took so long to put his name to the official story!

But! If Officer Baker really did encounter a man walking away from the stairway a few floors up, it was someone involved in the assassination. Which raises the question: Why did Mr Truly vouch for him as an employee?
 
Thumb1:

Most likely Officer Baker agreed to invent an encounter with an employee by the back stairs up a few floors,

Nonsense!....  Baker was simply a motorcycle patrolman who responded immediately when he heard the sound of rifle shots.  He wasn't involved in anyway and only started lying as his superiors wanted after he had given his sworn affidavit. 

Baker did encounter Lee in the second floor lunchroom, but the encounter was so mundane and innocuous he simply dismissed it as being important when he wrote his affidavit.  However, he did recall seeing a man on either the third or fourth floor ( could have been the fifth) . The reason he recalled seeing the man was because the man was being furtive and trying to duck out of sight.   ( an indication of guilt)   The man (Jack Dougherty ?) apparently had been headed down stairs on the stairway when he heard Baker ascending, and he saw Baker's white helmet.  He immediately tried to get out of sight but Baker spotted him and ordered him to come back to the stairs. ( he was by the elevator and only about twenty feet away)   

If Officer Baker really did encounter a man walking away from the stairway a few floors up, it was someone involved in the assassination. Which raises the question: Why did Mr Truly vouch for him as an employee?

 "it was someone involved in the assassination."

Yes, I think you're right....

Why did Mr Truly vouch for him as an employee?

Because Roy Truly was also involved.... I believe the man was Jack Dougherty and Truly was afraid that the slow witted Dougherty would start telling Baker about hiding a rifle up on the sixth floor. So Truly intervened immediately when Baker started asking questions.


Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1147
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #12 on: October 23, 2019, 04:34:34 PM »
Most likely Officer Baker agreed to invent an encounter with an employee by the back stairs up a few floors,

Nonsense!....  Baker was simply a motorcycle patrolman who responded immediately when he heard the sound of rifle shots.  He wasn't involved in anyway and only started lying as his superiors wanted after he had given his sworn affidavit. 

Baker did encounter Lee in the second floor lunchroom, but the encounter was so mundane and innocuous he simply dismissed it as being important when he wrote his affidavit. 
.......

Uhhh.... he drew his service revolver, allegedly holding it just inches from a subject's torso, in the presence of the subject's employer, inside their place of business. How many times per day, or for that matter, in an entire career did a Dallas patrol officer have occasion to do that, in the line of duty?

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1993
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #13 on: October 23, 2019, 04:41:35 PM »
(My research is credited in several books; ~~~)

 :D

Mr Scully rebuts the accusation of narcissism with another loud blow of the Scully Trumpet-----------whose timbre is remarkably similar to that of the Doyle Trumpet!

'All through the day, I me mine, I me mine, I me mine...'


Maybe if we start a thread on the topic ''Tom Scully - Ain't He Just Wonderful?', he'll get the warm fuzzy feeling he so obviously craves and will go away for a week. 

Meanwhile the rest of us can get back to the trivial pursuit of establishing Mr Oswald's alibi!  Thumb1:

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1993
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #14 on: October 23, 2019, 04:48:48 PM »
Uhhh.... he drew his service revolver, allegedly holding it just inches from a subject's torso, in the presence of the subject's employer, inside their place of business. How many times per day, or for that matter, in an entire career did a Dallas patrol officer have occasion to do that, in the line of duty?

If you believe that 'a man walking away from the stairway' on 'the third or fourth floor' was Mr Oswald by the second-floor lunchroom, then you'll believe anything. Explains a lot really!

Now, Mr Scully, I've a massively important research project for you!
  • Who designed the lunchroom?
  • Were they related in any way to the person who delivered the coke machine?
  • Can such a link, if established, be related to the Janney thing?
Get this right, Mr Scully, and your Amazing Research might be Credited In Even More Books!  Thumb1:

Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2319
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #15 on: October 23, 2019, 04:53:39 PM »
Uhhh.... he drew his service revolver, allegedly holding it just inches from a subject's torso, in the presence of the subject's employer, inside their place of business. How many times per day, or for that matter, in an entire career did a Dallas patrol officer have occasion to do that, in the line of duty?

     Baker did Not "drew his service revolver" when he came upon/saw Oswald. Baker had the gun already drawn as he was going up the stairwell. Not sure what your law enforcement background may be, but on-the-ground law enforcement draw their weapon often. Actually firing a drawn weapon is far rarer. Nowadays, with tazzers etc, the drawing of a weapon even more frequent.

Offline Otto Beck

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 220
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #16 on: October 23, 2019, 05:03:34 PM »
:D

Mr Scully rebuts the accusation of narcissism with another loud blow of the Scully Trumpet-----------whose timbre is remarkably similar to that of the Doyle Trumpet!

'All through the day, I me mine, I me mine, I me mine...'


Maybe if we start a thread on the topic ''Tom Scully - Ain't He Just Wonderful?', he'll get the warm fuzzy feeling he so obviously craves and will go away for a week. 

Meanwhile the rest of us can get back to the trivial pursuit of establishing Mr Oswald's alibi!  Thumb1:

I've noticed in others threads that Scully is now seeking to pad his buddy list with WC apologists...

-snip-
Now, Mr Scully, I've a massively important research project for you!
  • Who designed the lunchroom?
  • Were they related in any way to the person who delivered the coke machine?
  • Can such a link, if established, be related to the Janney thing?
Get this right, Mr Scully, and your Amazing Research might be Credited In Even More Books!  Thumb1:

I want the 201 file on the first cousin of the vending machine factory manager!

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1993
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #17 on: October 23, 2019, 05:17:52 PM »
I've noticed in others threads that Scully is now seeking to pad his buddy list with WC apologists...

Yep! They flatter him and he happily becomes their useful id*ot.

Quote
I want the 201 file on the first cousin of the vending machine factory manager!

That's a tall order, Mr Beck, but if there's one guy who might pull it off it'd be Mr Scully, the Man Whose Research Has Been Credited In BooksThumb1:

Offline Tom Scully

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1147
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #18 on: October 23, 2019, 05:28:43 PM »
Alan, Otto, Doyle, larrytrotter.jpg, are killing this forum. None of the four have a single accomplishment to point readers to. Insult and deliberate distraction is their "contribution" dressed in their partisan caps and jerseys.

Facts do not pick a team. If you have nothing to actually inform readers, kindly read instead of posting. Wipe your weapons quickly to occupy your hands instead of keying distraction into your posts and threads.

If I have it wrong, post links to information you've shared with us that you are particularly proud of. I will apologize if I have missed it and failed to give you the credit you surely have earned if you have informed any of us of something useful, as for example, W. Tracy Parnell often does.

Learn, for example, from Colin Crow. His threads have a purpose because he has a reasonable goal, to identify verifiable facts and build on them. He is not attempting to "exonerate" Oswald and "crack open the case," in one ridiculous swoop, like this silly thread attempts. I have attempted to show you through examples, how a fact is a fact, vs speculative chatter, and I posted an example of fact discovery and presentation actually resulting in a deposition of an unwilling subject of interest.

On the other hand, what have any of you shared with readers in this thread that informs them of anything?
« Last Edit: October 23, 2019, 05:39:52 PM by Tom Scully »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1993
Re: Did Roy Truly and/or Marion Baker Lie?
« Reply #19 on: October 23, 2019, 05:33:04 PM »
Alan, Otto, Doyle, larrytrotter.jpg, are killing this forum. None of the four have a single accomplishment to point readers to. Insult and deliberate distraction is their "contribution" dressed in their partisan caps and jerseys.

And this is exactly the same sob-bark-sob mode Mr Doyle goes into too whenever he becomes the recipient of home truths.

Run along to The Blessed Jean, Mr Scully, and tell her all about it---------I'm sure she'll give you a pat on the head and a biscuit  Thumb1:

 

Mobile View