3 x 5 Index Card that is item # 14 On the List

[John Iacoletti]

Weak.....Very weak, John..... Do you you think your insipid counterpoint destroys Tom Alyea's statement?

There is now literally no reason to think that Alyea saw Day creating the magic partial palmprint in the TSBD.

Did Day see the print on the SIDE of the barrel, or the bottom of the barrel?

I’m not convinced that Day saw (or lifted) any print on the barrel.

[Martin Weidmann]

Drain was up to his eyebrows in the cover up and the framing of Lee Oswald.....But perhaps he truly believes the DPD planted a palm print on the rifle.   Drain is saying that the DPD framed the dead Lee Oswald.....so he knows they were corrupt.....

“I just don’t believe there ever was a print,” said Drain.

He's right there never ever was a identifiable Palm Print on the rifle.....  Day lifted what he imagined to be a palm print from the WOODEN forgrip but what he imagined to be a palm print, was nothing but an unidentifiable smudge.

He's right there never ever was a identifiable Palm Print on the rifle.....  Day lifted what he imagined to be a palm print from the WOODEN forgrip but what he imagined to be a palm print, was nothing but an unidentifiable smudge.

So, this entire convoluted conversation was much to do about nothing?

[Walt Cakebread]

He's right there never ever was a identifiable Palm Print on the rifle.....  Day lifted what he imagined to be a palm print from the WOODEN forgrip but what he imagined to be a palm print, was nothing but an unidentifiable smudge.

So, this entire convoluted conversation was much to do about nothing?

No....They succeeded in leading the pissants to believe that Lee Oswald's palm print was found on the rifle.     

[Walt Cakebread]

No....They succeeded in leading the pissants to believe that Lee Oswald's palm print was found on the rifle.   

They succeeded in leading the pissants to believe that Lee Oswald's palm print was found on the rifle. 

And to this very day many CT's still believe that Lee's palm print was on the rifle, and they attempt to explain it away by saying it was planted on the 5/8 inch diameter metal barrel....   5/8 " is the diameter of a AA penlight battery and the circumference is a mere two inches ...... The surface that would come in contact with a man's palm would be approximately 1/4 inch.   A man could not deposit an identifiable palm print on that small surface.

There never ever was a palm print on the metal barrel..... What the lying conspirators presented as Lee Oswald's palm print is nothing but an unidentifiable smudge that Lt Day spotted on the WOODEN foregrip of the rifle when he was examining the rifle in the TSBD just minutes after he pulled it from beneath the pallet of books where it had been carefully hidden.   Day lifted that smudge and placed the lift on a little white index card, and he scrawled the pertinent information on the card " off underside gun barrell ( sic) near end of foregrip   C2766"   he also signed and dated the card....   

The Dallas DA told reporters that they had found Lee Harrrrrvey Ossssssswald's prints on the gun, which was a bare faced lie, but they were stuck with Wades lie ( he was a key conspirator) So they invented the tale about Day disassembling the rifle and discovering Lee's palm print on the metal barrel, but had failed to tell The FBI about the discovery. They had forgot that they had listed the 3 X 5 index card on the evidence inventory sheet that had been released to the FBI at midnight 11 / 22 /63. When they became aware that the index card had been listed on the evidence inventory list they tried to destroy all of those copies....  There were many copies made of the evidence inventory list and they tried to destroy all of those copies.....However one copy was kept in the files of the Texas Rangers where it was discovered many years later.   There is no copy of the original evidence inventory list in the records ......   
 

[John Iacoletti]

They succeeded in leading the pissants to believe that Lee Oswald's palm print was found on the rifle. 

And to this very day many CT's still believe that Lee's palm print was on the rifle, and they attempt to explain it away by saying it was planted on the 5/8 inch diameter metal barrel....   5/8 " is the diameter of a AA penlight battery and the circumference is a mere two inches ...... The surface that would come in contact with a man's palm would be approximately 1/4 inch.   A man could not deposit an identifiable palm print on that small surface.

There never ever was a palm print on the metal barrel..... What the lying conspirators presented as Lee Oswald's palm print is nothing but an unidentifiable smudge that Lt Day spotted on the WOODEN foregrip of the rifle when he was examining the rifle in the TSBD just minutes after he pulled it from beneath the pallet of books where it had been carefully hidden.   Day lifted that smudge and placed the lift on a little white index card, and he scrawled the pertinent information on the card " off underside gun barrell ( sic) near end of foregrip   C2766"   he also signed and dated the card....   

The Dallas DA told reporters that they had found Lee Harrrrrvey Ossssssswald's prints on the gun, which was a bare faced lie, but they were stuck with Wades lie ( he was a key conspirator) So they invented the tale about Day disassembling the rifle and discovering Lee's palm print on the metal barrel, but had failed to tell The FBI about the discovery. They had forgot that they had listed the 3 X 5 index card on the evidence inventory sheet that had been released to the FBI at midnight 11 / 22 /63. When they became aware that the index card had been listed on the evidence inventory list they tried to destroy all of those copies....  There were many copies made of the evidence inventory list and they tried to destroy all of those copies.....However one copy was kept in the files of the Texas Rangers where it was discovered many years later.   There is no copy of the original evidence inventory list in the records ......

Cool story, bro.

Now what's your evidence that

a) A man could not deposit an identifiable palm print on that small surface
b) Day spotted an unidentifiable smudge on the WOODEN foregrip of the rifle when he was examining the rifle in the TSBD
c) Day lifted that smudge in the TSBD and placed the lift on a little white index card
d) A 3 X 5 index card was listed on an evidence inventory sheet that was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63
e) A 3 x 5 index card with a lift was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63
f) they tried to destroy all of those copies

P.S. telling the same story over and over again is not evidence that it's true.

[Walt Cakebread]

Cool story, bro.

Now what's your evidence that

a) A man could not deposit an identifiable palm print on that small surface
b) Day spotted an unidentifiable smudge on the WOODEN foregrip of the rifle when he was examining the rifle in the TSBD
c) Day lifted that smudge in the TSBD and placed the lift on a little white index card
d) A 3 X 5 index card was listed on an evidence inventory sheet that was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63
e) A 3 x 5 index card with a lift was released to the FBI at midnight 11/22/63
f) they tried to destroy all of those copies

P.S. telling the same story over and over again is not evidence that it's true.

[Walt Cakebread]

Do you see a print on this exhibit??

[John Iacoletti]

The existence of this card does not demonstrate that it was lifted in the TSBD, or that it was lifted on 11/22/63, or that it was turned over to the FBI on 11/22/63, or that any evidence sheets were destroyed.

Yes, I do see ridges on the exhibit.