Those Front Steps

[Peter Kleinschmidt]

So Mr Graves can't explain the magic 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady! 

Can anyone?

Just a hint of anything different from their view and they freak out. Do they not know their view is constantly changing with every situation that is challenged. Their investigation amounts to someone else told them it was a LN. They never can start from the beginning or anywhere else in between with any degree of knowledge

[Alan Ford]

Yes there is no horizontal shadow on Lovelady but how does that place him in Wiegman?

 

That puts him not where you need to put him to get a vertical shadow hitting him! 

[Royell Storing]

I have Alan scrambling for nit picks, he has no answer for the perspective problem of where Lovelady must be in Darnell, exposed his cgi cartoon, his only comeback was to repost the same unfinished graphic again and again and claimed it was "fair game" and have now finally ridiculed the very essence of "what happened" and as for you Royell, you are just a bundle of incompetence, God luv ya!

Sure, but you have to rule out the possible before you consider the impossible. Btw the Jet black curtain is nothing of the sort and the quality of the black level was lost a dozen transfers ago, you are such a Noob.



In Wiegman she is clearly in front, it was discussed when Ford posted his blue unfinished railing and we both conceded that we couldn't see the top but for some reason he wants to keep asking the same question which I keep answering and for some reason you two want to keep asking the same question over and over, it's an interesting study in mental illness, it's most bizarre. You Kooks sure are a weird bunch.



Ummmm, you don't understand, this is Ford's claim and it's up to Ford to scientifically place Lovelady, you say my graphics are rubbish and I'm OK with that but that means you can't use my graphics as proof of anything, and all Ford has given as evidence of Lovelady's position is say, "I see it, but I can't prove it", yeah that's a really convincing technical explanation.
And the claim that even after how many thousands perhaps millions have seen the Wiegman film, it's only now that this "shadow" has been missed for 55 years? Everyone wants to be a Hero.

JohnM

   The above is Further Proof YOU are running away from Ford's question. WHICH SIDE of the handrail do YOU/MYTTON have the lady standing on? East or West side of the handrail? 

[Alan Ford]

In Wiegman she is clearly in front, it was discussed when Ford posted his blue unfinished railing and we both conceded that we couldn't see the top (...)

In other words--------------and I know it kills you to have to admit it, Mr Mytton!---------------she's on the east side of the center railing in Wiegman:



So why does your Soopah-Doopah-3D-MyttonGIF have her well to the west of your Soopah-Doopah-MyttonDrawing of the center railing?

I'll tell you why, Mr Mytton----------because, in your scam artist zeal to stick Mr Lovelady farther west than he really is, ya goofed up! 

[Alan Ford]

So Oswald got in front of Lovelady, yet Lovelady said he never saw Oswald, go figure?

 

Mr Oswald never got in front of Mr Lovelady, you silly sausage------------Mr Lovelady stepped down and was therefore no longer blocking any of Mr Oswald's head or upper body!

===================> more extensive blackening out required!



 

[Alan Ford]

This today, friends, from Mr Pat Speer-----------a researcher whose work I esteem very much!-------------over on the Education Forum:

I was in Dallas on the weekend of the anniversary, and found myself standing in front of the TSBD at 12:30. And I looked at the steps from the angle of Altgens. Well, it hit me then that the Lovelady figure in Altgens was standing in the middle of the steps, and not on the far west of the steps, as seems apparent from the photo.

Mr Speer took this photograph at 12:30pm on 11/22/19:



There is simply no physical way that this shadowline can be reconciled with the 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady in the Wiegman film:



Like I've been telling you people, ain't no shadow on Lovelady!

 

[Alan Ford]

Just a hint of anything different from their view and they freak out. Do they not know their view is constantly changing with every situation that is challenged. Their investigation amounts to someone else told them it was a LN. They never can start from the beginning or anywhere else in between with any degree of knowledge

Yep-------but this one is not just "different from their view", it destroys everything they have been told (and have in turn been telling us) about the case.

Hence the pressure poor Mr Mytton has been under these last days... he hasn't held up very well, has he?