Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 136924 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #368 on: November 19, 2019, 01:31:02 AM »
Advertisement
   Looks like a Chia Pet. Just in time for Christmas.

 Thumb1:

And look at that lady in white grow:D



This latest effort from poor panicked Mr Mytton is just too funny for words!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #368 on: November 19, 2019, 01:31:02 AM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2614
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #369 on: November 19, 2019, 01:38:41 AM »
No worries, at least some of us can post a photo when we are actually discussing a photo.
Anyway, perspective has never been your forte but hey at least you're trying.

JohnM

   That alleged BLACK shadow is a legit Issue. There is No way around it.  Another Issue is the main subjects possibly changing positions. Plus, we do Not know with certainty the elapsed time between the images being contrasted

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #370 on: November 19, 2019, 02:06:49 AM »
Sure you did!



Look at that western column grow!

 :D :D :D



Seriously that's the best you've got?, we're looking at Lovelady's horizontal position and a little vertical compression and a slight camera change of position is not going to move Lovelady's image halfway across the frame.

Anyway, I found a version with the correct vertical compression and now we see Prayer Person closely aligned, the western column is correctly aligned, the size of the entrance relative to the glass doors behind is correctly aligned and still Lovelady is no where near the centre railing. Sucko!
Just face it, you're way out of your depth and you can go ahead and nitpick some more minor insignificant "details" but that will in no way change the overall mathematically correct geometry, Lovelady is near the shadow EXACTLY where your 3D examples say he should be!



JohnM
« Last Edit: November 19, 2019, 03:13:53 AM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #370 on: November 19, 2019, 02:06:49 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #371 on: November 19, 2019, 02:13:53 AM »
   That alleged BLACK shadow is a legit Issue. There is No way around it.  Another Issue is the main subjects possibly changing positions. Plus, we do Not know with certainty the elapsed time between the images being contrasted

A. it's a shadow
B. Yes, Lovelady appears but what has that got to do with the price of fish?
C. We are looking at the overall layout and where the shadowed Lovelady fits, how is the time elapsed relevant?

JohnM

Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #372 on: November 19, 2019, 03:33:20 AM »
Suspended for what?

And why ignore my graphic? maybe because it totally screws with your stupid fakery BS!



JohnM
Your graphic? ha ha ha you need serious help. Your family needs to do an intervention, for your own good


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #372 on: November 19, 2019, 03:33:20 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #373 on: November 19, 2019, 03:45:21 AM »
Your graphic? ha ha ha you need serious help. Your family needs to do an intervention, for your own good

Thanks for the advice, and while I have your attention, here's an updated graphic which puts the final nail in the coffin. These conspiracy nuts who have no experience in the real world should leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups, and those pathetic Noobs who can't even post an image to save their lives, really need a new hobby, looking at you Royell. Hahahaha!



JohnM
« Last Edit: November 19, 2019, 03:53:28 AM by John Mytton »

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 833
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #374 on: November 19, 2019, 04:12:05 AM »
Thanks for the advice, and while I have your attention, here's an updated graphic which puts the final nail in the coffin. These conspiracy nuts who have no experience in the real world should leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups, and those pathetic Noobs who can't even post an image to save their lives, really need a new hobby, looking at you Royell. Hahahaha!

JohnM

"..leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups.."  :D

ETA: What you should have done was overlap the 2 images and fade the overlap in and out, if you are going to fade instead of blink. Not sure how applying a fade or morph effect to 2 images is advanced analysis, but you're the expert. Did you write the algorithm or did you just stumble across the Gimp menu option?
« Last Edit: November 19, 2019, 04:35:54 AM by Jack Trojan »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #374 on: November 19, 2019, 04:12:05 AM »


Offline Peter Kleinschmidt

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #375 on: November 19, 2019, 04:21:54 AM »
Thanks for the advice, and while I have your attention, here's an updated graphic which puts the final nail in the coffin. These conspiracy nuts who have no experience in the real world should leave this type of advanced graphical analysis to the grown ups, and those pathetic Noobs who can't even post an image to save their lives, really need a new hobby, looking at you Royell. Hahahaha!



JohnM
John the Expert, "advanced graphical analysis"

Let me guess, next week you'll claim to be a Statistician. Just another hobby, right? ha ha ha  Jonathan Higgins was a fictional character too!