Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 135221 times)

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 905
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #312 on: November 15, 2019, 01:15:40 AM »
Advertisement
The front entrance door of the TSBD can open BOTH ways, either out. or inward.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #312 on: November 15, 2019, 01:15:40 AM »


Offline Christer Jacobsson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 36
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #313 on: November 15, 2019, 01:22:15 AM »

Lovelady IMO..

https://photos.app.goo.gl/jzkzw6KCL9iZStKi8

Best Rgds,
Christer

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 905
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #314 on: November 15, 2019, 01:23:34 AM »
Anyone who tries to explain away the magic 'shadow' down Mr Lovelady in the ridiculous way you have done, Mr Mason, certainly is!  Thumb1:

If I understand you right. Alan,  there has been some alteration of several frames of the Wiegman film in about 3 or 4 of 18 frames per sec sequence, in which the conspirator film experts were able to blacken out the shape of Oswald.

and I asked why the  conspirators would decide to leave SOME of the image of Oswald, his head as it were, rather than blacken the head out also, so as to leave NO chance of any Oswald EVER seen at all in the Wiegman film?
« Last Edit: November 15, 2019, 01:25:15 AM by Zeon Mason »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #314 on: November 15, 2019, 01:23:34 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #315 on: November 15, 2019, 07:47:37 AM »
If I understand you right. Alan,  there has been some alteration of several frames of the Wiegman film in about 3 or 4 of 18 frames per sec sequence, in which the conspirator film experts were able to blacken out the shape of Oswald.

3 or 4 frames? Every single Wiegman frame showing Mr Lovelady has had a dark vertical strip added to his right side! Even when Mr Lovelady takes a step down, the 'shadow' moves down with him, continuing to cover most of his right side. Even if (in the parallel universe some of you KeepOswaldAwayFromTheFrontSteps people think hosted this assassination) the shadow line from the western column had extended diagonally right across much of the west side of the entranceway, this would be bizarre!



Quote
and I asked why the  conspirators would decide to leave SOME of the image of Oswald, his head as it were, rather than blacken the head out also, so as to leave NO chance of any Oswald EVER seen at all in the Wiegman film?

So your objection to the evidence of Mr Oswald's presence just behind Mr Lovelady is not that you have an alternative explanation for it but that the cover-up people in 1963 didn't predict the rise of digital technology and an online research community capable of producing 3D reconstructions of the entranceway!  :D

Now!

The priority in this rush job was to kill any identification of Mr Oswald in Wiegman. (Remember: they knew exactly where to find Mr Oswald in Wiegman, because Mr Oswald will have told Captain Fritz in his first interrogation exactly where he was at the time of the shooting. Mr Lovelady's name will have been mentioned, which explains why they went straight to him with a blowup of the Altgens photograph.)

Here's what the original Wiegman film showed:

1. In the frames showing Mr Lovelady at higher elevation, the original Wiegman film showed
-----------a second head in very close proximity to Mr Lovelady's head (right behind it)
-----------a white tshirt and bare right arm, identifying the owner of the second head as a casually dressed white male employee.

Solution to the Lovelady@HigherElevation frames? Add a crude dark strip down Mr Lovelady's right side. People will assume it's a natural shadow. In the absence of a second body, it's unlikely anyone will even notice the second head. Even if anyone were to do so, they won't be able to identify it as Mr Oswald's. Could be anybody!



2. In the frames showing Mr Lovelady at lower elevation, the original Wiegman film showed
-----------Mr Oswald's sunlit head/face now easily visible in all frames (because he hasn't changed elevation)
-----------Mr Oswald's t-shirted upper body and bare arms now easily visible
-----------> Mr Oswald now easily identifiable

Solution to the Lovelady@LowerElevation frames? Don't just add a crude dark strip down Mr Lovelady's right side--------blacken out all of Mr Oswald, head included. It will be crude work, but it will fool the fools!



The key point in all this is that the entire scam gambled on no one's ever noticing that the shadow down Mr Lovelady's right side couldn't possibly be a natural shadow. Up to very recently, the gamble paid off!

 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: November 17, 2019, 12:30:07 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #316 on: November 15, 2019, 10:23:32 PM »
     The lack of rebuttal would include the Forum Cartoonist Mytton. You know you are onto something when he goes crickets.

In fairness to Mr Mytton, he may be a coward but it's not his fault he can't offer a rebuttal-------------it's Mr Oswald's fault for going outside to watch the P. parade!  Thumb1:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #316 on: November 15, 2019, 10:23:32 PM »


Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #317 on: November 16, 2019, 01:57:23 AM »
Bump regarding COP Vertical Shadow reference. Please keep up

Keep up with a non-provable claim that LeeHarveyOswald was on the Top Step/Landing of the TSBD Bldg Entrance Portal during filming by DaveWiegman? No Thanks.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 435
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #318 on: November 16, 2019, 03:33:34 PM »
If I understand you right. Alan,  there has been some alteration of several frames of the Wiegman film in about 3 or 4 of 18 frames per sec sequence, in which the conspirator film experts were able to blacken out the shape of Oswald.

and I asked why the  conspirators would decide to leave SOME of the image of Oswald, his head as it were, rather than blacken the head out also, so as to leave NO chance of any Oswald EVER seen at all in the Wiegman film?

Another question would be when was the WiegmanFilm first publicly seen? But, WiegmanFilm alteration to hide LeeHarveyOswald is a baseless claim. He is not there!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #318 on: November 16, 2019, 03:33:34 PM »


Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2598
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #319 on: November 16, 2019, 04:17:56 PM »
Keep up with a non-provable claim that LeeHarveyOswald was on the Top Step/Landing of the TSBD Bldg Entrance Portal during filming by DaveWiegman? No Thanks.

    Forget the Oswald claim. Instead, tell this Forum exactly what is that Straight-As-A-String, Jet Black, Curtain.