Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 22514 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1924
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #530 on: November 12, 2019, 08:19:29 AM »


Mr Davidson, is this gif supposed to illustrate anything specific?

 Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #530 on: November 12, 2019, 08:19:29 AM »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1924
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #531 on: November 12, 2019, 08:38:17 AM »
     The alleged "shadow" on Lovelady is Ridiculous. It looks like he has a Heavy Jet Black Overcoat draping over his shoulder.

Indeed----and I tried to put one over that shoulder in order to avoid the conclusion that the frames had been messed with. Unfortunately it didn't work! (cf. Lovelady in Hughes as JFK is coming onto Elm Street)

It's telling that no one has thus far been able to offer a viable alternative explanation for that dark shadow-which-cannot-be-a-shadow...  Instead we've just had periodic nonsense about the west column & lintel shadows!

Thumb1:
« Last Edit: November 12, 2019, 08:38:58 AM by Alan Ford »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1924
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #532 on: November 12, 2019, 08:54:07 AM »
Now!

The resistance to the evidence putting Mr Oswald right behind Mr Lovelady at the time of the shooting---------



---------will come from various quarters:

1. Lone Nutters (but who cares------these poor souls' capacity for motivated reasoning is already legendary!  :D )

2. CTs who consider the second floor lunchroom incident sacrosanct (they'd rather keep that fiction alive than allow Mr Oswald his legitimate alibi)

3. CTs for whom JFK assassination research is an addictive hobby (the last thing they want to see is closure on the issue of Mr Oswald's whereabouts 12.30pm... what would they do with their days?)

4. 'CTs' pretending to be CTs (usually pretty easy to spot!)

5. Harvey and Lee nuts (The Great Armstrong doesn't put either Oswald on the steps so we sure as heck ain't gonna!)

6. CTs who have been heavily invested in the Prayer Man claim (it would be very sad to see Prayer Man become the new Lunchroom Incident-----i.e. the sacrosanct X that closes good people off to alternative ideas. Especially as Mr Oswald's alibi in Wiegman would never have been established had it not been for the brilliant and indefatigable work of the Prayer Man people. E.g.! Mr Kamp's game-changing unearthing of the Hosty notes that confirmed that Mr Oswald did indeed claim to have gone outside for the P. parade after a visit to the second floor lunchroom for a coke).

 Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #532 on: November 12, 2019, 08:54:07 AM »

Offline Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Those Front Steps
« Reply #533 on: November 12, 2019, 03:43:26 PM »

Who or whatever that is, it isn't Oswald...

Oswald is up in the 2nd floor lunch room at that time...

Offline Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Those Front Steps
« Reply #534 on: November 13, 2019, 05:01:21 AM »
     For starters, I do Not believe that Lovelady is standing on the landing. And your claiming that Frazier was standing "about a foot and a half from the front door in Darnell" is also Incorrect.  Generally, who stands Only a "foot and a half" in front of a busy doorway, with their BACK facing that busy doorway? You claim to be "real good" but clearly Lack Common Sense.

He says while cluelessly ignoring the shadow evidence Davidson just posted and how it illustrates Frazier being 1.5 feet in front of the doorway according to the shadows seen on the cops' backs...

The door swings both ways...
« Last Edit: November 13, 2019, 05:09:33 AM by Brian Doyle »

JFK Assassination Forum

Those Front Steps
« Reply #534 on: November 13, 2019, 05:01:21 AM »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1577
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #535 on: November 14, 2019, 12:26:02 AM »
He says while cluelessly ignoring the shadow evidence Davidson just posted and how it illustrates Frazier being 1.5 feet in front of the doorway according to the shadows seen on the cops' backs...

The door swings both ways...

    Shadows on a cop's back being proffered as evidence?  This exposes the impossible position you have been painted into.  I do Not believe that Evidence has been submitted to prove Oswald is anywhere on the TSBD steps or landing. But your "shadows" proffer is down right embarrassing.

Offline Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Those Front Steps
« Reply #536 on: November 14, 2019, 12:44:06 AM »
    Shadows on a cop's back being proffered as evidence?  This exposes the impossible position you have been painted into.  I do Not believe that Evidence has been submitted to prove Oswald is anywhere on the TSBD steps or landing. But your "shadows" proffer is down right embarrassing.

That's just empty talk...

The science you are obviously oblivious to shows that the column/lintel corner shadow that you can see in Darnell on Frazier is also seen in the Davidson GIF on the cops' backs...If you look closely it is about 1.5 feet from the glass partition...

That's obviously why Davidson posted it even though he added no words himself...

JFK Assassination Forum

Those Front Steps
« Reply #536 on: November 14, 2019, 12:44:06 AM »

Offline Zeon Mason

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 287
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #537 on: November 14, 2019, 12:51:11 AM »
Now!

The resistance to the evidence putting Mr Oswald right behind Mr Lovelady at the time of the shooting---------



---------will come from various quarters:

1. Lone Nutters (but who cares------these poor souls' capacity for motivated reasoning is already legendary!  :D )

2. CTs who consider the second floor lunchroom incident sacrosanct (they'd rather keep that fiction alive than allow Mr Oswald his legitimate alibi)

3. CTs for whom JFK assassination research is an addictive hobby (the last thing they want to see is closure on the issue of Mr Oswald's whereabouts 12.30pm... what would they do with their days?)

4. 'CTs' pretending to be CTs (usually pretty easy to spot!)

5. Harvey and Lee nuts (The Great Armstrong doesn't put either Oswald on the steps so we sure as heck ain't gonna!)

6. CTs who have been heavily invested in the Prayer Man claim (it would be very sad to see Prayer Man become the new Lunchroom Incident-----i.e. the sacrosanct X that closes good people off to alternative ideas. Especially as Mr Oswald's alibi in Wiegman would never have been established had it not been for the brilliant and indefatigable work of the Prayer Man people. E.g.! Mr Kamp's game-changing unearthing of the Hosty notes that confirmed that Mr Oswald did indeed claim to have gone outside for the P. parade after a visit to the second floor lunchroom for a coke).

 Thumb1:

So anyone who questions Alan Fords theory of the day, is one of the above?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #537 on: November 14, 2019, 12:51:11 AM »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1577
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #538 on: November 14, 2019, 01:35:46 AM »
That's just empty talk...

The science you are obviously oblivious to shows that the column/lintel corner shadow that you can see in Darnell on Frazier is also seen in the Davidson GIF on the cops' backs...If you look closely it is about 1.5 feet from the glass partition...

That's obviously why Davidson posted it even though he added no words himself...

      Nobody, repeat Nobody stands with their back to a door that Opens Toward them and is a scant 1.5 feet away.

Offline Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3141
Those Front Steps
« Reply #539 on: November 14, 2019, 07:00:19 AM »
      Nobody, repeat Nobody stands with their back to a door that Opens Toward them and is a scant 1.5 feet away.

It also opens inward...

People stand with their backs toward doors all the time...

You're dodging answering the point about the shadows being similar on the cops and Frazier...

JFK Assassination Forum

Those Front Steps
« Reply #539 on: November 14, 2019, 07:00:19 AM »

 

Mobile View