Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Those Front Steps  (Read 135160 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2019, 11:36:00 PM »
Advertisement
Yet another thread on the same line of "inquiry". I guess the BYP (or the "Nessie"  or "Yeti" pics?) lesson is unlearned.... Who is the audience for this and what is the goal...what are readers to be convinced of, in the best of all possible outcomes? What have the BYP convinced you of? Why would your image evidence be more convincing to your audience than the BYP are to you, if you do not accept the authenticity of the BYP?

If you do not accept that these are pointless "out in front with Lovelady" "studies" in that nothing will be resolved as a result of them, why absorb this forum so completely, with them?

"Out in front with Lovelady"? What in heaven's name are you talking about, Mr Scully? :(

Anyway, to address the closest thing you have here to a substantive question------------------
Mr Oswald claimed to have gone outside to watch the Presidential parade. And... Messrs Lovelady and Shelley lied about when they left the front entranceway.

Now! Let these facts sink in. Once they have, you will finally understand why so many of us consider that Depository front entranceway, and the visual record of that entranceway, to be of potentially tremendous importance to this case.

Maybe we're wrong. Maybe we should be focusing on more material matters such as the fact that Person A once went fishing with Person B whose third cousin was a grade below Person D in high school.

Or maybe we're right!

Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #8 on: September 21, 2019, 11:36:00 PM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #9 on: September 22, 2019, 12:01:03 AM »
Quote from: Alan Ford

link=topic=2194.msg61413#msg61413 date=1569105360
Maybe we're wrong. Maybe we should be focusing on more material matters such as the fact that Person A once went fishing with Person B whose third cousin was a grade below Person D in high school.

Or maybe we're right! [!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]

(emphasis added by MWT)


We?

We who?

-- MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: September 22, 2019, 12:38:25 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2019, 02:53:27 AM »
Alan...Red plaid shirt is Lovelady. There are other stills that show him more clearly, but I would have to dig.
However, while we are on the front steps...I came across this---- http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/40/4006-001.gif
Notice the bottom right [CD 354] --Oswald said [according to Fritz] that ''he left the TSBD through the front door and as he did.. he encountered two men who identified themselves as Secret Service and needed to use a telephone."

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #10 on: September 22, 2019, 02:53:27 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #11 on: September 22, 2019, 03:52:30 AM »
Alan...Red plaid shirt is Lovelady. There are other stills that show him more clearly, but I would have to dig.
However, while we are on the front steps...I came across this---- http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/40/4006-001.gif
Notice the bottom right [CD 354] --Oswald said [according to Fritz] that ''he left the TSBD through the front door and as he did.. he encountered two men who identified themselves as Secret Service and needed to use a telephone."

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2019, 04:25:18 AM »


Patsy Lee Harvey Oswald was scrawny and was not really all that bald. Lovelady was a beefier guy and was noticeably bald on the back of his head.
 


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #12 on: September 22, 2019, 04:25:18 AM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #13 on: September 22, 2019, 12:12:18 PM »


Patsy Lee Harvey Oswald was scrawny and was not really all that bald. Lovelady was a beefier guy and was noticeably bald on the back of his head.
 

Hello Mr Freeman!

We seem to be talking at cross purposes...... I am questioning the assumption that the man near the bottom of the entranceway in these frames from the Hughes film------------

----------is Mr Lovelady. Neither baldness, beefiness nor plaidness can be established in this figure.

Mr Lovelady may already be standing several steps up, which is where we will see him in the Wiegman film and the Altgens photograph in just a few seconds' time.

Mr Oswald was wearing a reddish shirt (CE151) with a white tshirt underneath. I am suggesting he may in fact be the man in the frames above.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2019, 12:32:41 PM »
The dark strip down Mr Lovelady's right side in the Wiegman film----------


-----------cannot be caused by the shadow cast by the west wall/column.

Mr Stancak's excellent reconstruction of the shadow line in that entranceway at 12.30pm 11/22/63 (here: Darnell film) shows why:



For the dark strip down Mr Lovelady in the Wiegman film to be natural shadow, he would have to have been way over by the the green line. He most certainly wasn't!

Either Mr Lovelady was wearing a dark jacket OR the Wiegman frames have been altered to blacken out something in that spot. Or someone.



 Thumb1:
« Last Edit: September 22, 2019, 12:38:33 PM by Alan Ford »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #14 on: September 22, 2019, 12:32:41 PM »


Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4820
Re: Those Front Steps
« Reply #15 on: September 22, 2019, 03:51:13 PM »
 :D

Here we go again with people suggesting that Mr Lovelady in the Wiegman film is not in the red zone but way over by the green line.



Complete nonsense, of course!