Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "Domino Room Alibi"  (Read 73084 times)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #392 on: September 25, 2019, 09:33:36 AM »
Advertisement
Yeah, he's not the only one with "mental requirements". Had you'rs recently?

Denis,
Any thoughts on who came first, Roland's gunman on 6th or Jarman and Norman on 5th?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #392 on: September 25, 2019, 09:33:36 AM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #393 on: September 25, 2019, 10:04:03 AM »
Yeah, he's not the only one with "mental requirements". Had you'rs recently?

"you'rs" ?

LOL!

--  MWT   :D

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #394 on: September 25, 2019, 10:06:14 AM »
Denis,
Any thoughts on who came first, Roland's gunman on 6th or Jarman and Norman on 5th?

Janitor holdin' a broom at port arms?

-- MWT  ;)

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #394 on: September 25, 2019, 10:06:14 AM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #395 on: September 25, 2019, 12:15:42 PM »
Janitor holdin' a broom at port arms?

-- MWT  ;)

Ah, part of the Sweep-ret Service after all....eh?

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #396 on: September 25, 2019, 12:47:40 PM »
Ah, part of the Sweep-ret Service after all....eh?

When they told him he'd be part of the evil, evil, evil cover up, he thought they said sweep the floor up.

Big Jack was always kinda slow on the up-take.

--  MWT  ;)

PS  Say, they weren't using a "bar" up there to help 'em lift up the old sheets of plywood, were they?

« Last Edit: September 25, 2019, 12:52:16 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #396 on: September 25, 2019, 12:47:40 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #397 on: September 25, 2019, 01:38:34 PM »
Randle didn’t say that she saw Oswald carrying a narrow object straight down at his side.
>>> Nor did I.

That’s what you claimed to carry in this “test” you supposedly did.

Quote
She said something about a baseball bat, though.

No she didn’t.

Quote
>>> She saw a bag that 'almost touched the ground'. Did the Randle/McNeely bag almost touch the ground?

What part of “the desired length” and “in accordance with Mrs Randle’s observations” are you having trouble with?

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #398 on: September 25, 2019, 04:22:02 PM »

That’s what you claimed to carry in this “test” you supposedly did.
>>> The device is used to establish the 24/27/34.8" lengths in relation to the ground. I don't claim otherwise.



No she didn’t.
>>> McNeely acted in accordance with her observations. Feel free to provide a transcript of the Randle/McNeely tête-à-tête. Images would be helpful.

What part of “the desired length” and “in accordance with Mrs Randle’s observations” are you having trouble with?
>>> LOL. The length was certainly 'desired' by somebody all right ;). And what part of 'in accordance with Randle's observations' are you having trouble with? NARA quote: "Then, in accordance with Mrs. Randle's observations, Special Agent McNeely grasped the top of this sack with his hand, much like a right handed batter would pick up a baseball bat when approaching the plate".
« Last Edit: September 25, 2019, 05:01:17 PM by Bill Chapman »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #398 on: September 25, 2019, 04:22:02 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #399 on: September 25, 2019, 05:54:51 PM »
>>> The device is used to establish the 24/27/34.8" lengths in relation to the ground. I don't claim otherwise.

What's particularly amusing is that the photo you keep trotting out doesn't even show how close the object is to the ground.  Nor any measurement.

Why do you continue to think that your alleged experiment is more conclusive than Randle's own experiment?