Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "Domino Room Alibi"  (Read 73040 times)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #128 on: September 14, 2019, 03:53:10 PM »
Advertisement
You, or him?

(LOL)

Regardless, why do you always take things so personally, Brian I mean Colin?

--  MWT  ;)

I think you got my point about Oswald the bald faced liar (according to Lance).

Do you always post claims about others and then fail to address them when repeatedly requested to do so?

Like the one below.....

"You seem to prefer the interpretations which you believe exonerate Oswald ..."

To be honest, until now I have not paid your contributions to the debate much attention.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #128 on: September 14, 2019, 03:53:10 PM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #129 on: September 14, 2019, 04:04:00 PM »
I think you got my point about Oswald the bald faced liar (according to Lance).

Do you always post claims about others and then fail to address them when repeatedly requested to do so?

Like the one below.....

"You seem to prefer the interpretations which you believe exonerate Oswald ..."

To be honest, until now I have not paid your contributions to the debate much attention.

Repeatedly?

It would appear that hyperbole is your self-perceived "forte".
« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 04:06:12 PM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #130 on: September 14, 2019, 04:21:15 PM »
Repeatedly?

It would appear that hyperbole is your self-perceived "forte".

I count 3 successive posts by me on this page....

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2187.120.html

Perhaps you could suggest a more appropriate alternative descriptor...



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #130 on: September 14, 2019, 04:21:15 PM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #131 on: September 14, 2019, 05:15:47 PM »
I count 3 successive posts by me on this page....

https://www.jfkassassinationforum.com/index.php/topic,2187.120.html

Perhaps you could suggest a more appropriate alternative descriptor...

How many different questions are there therein that haven't already haven't attempted to answer?

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #132 on: September 14, 2019, 05:27:59 PM »
It doesn’t. I never claimed it did. Lance postulated in an unsupported claim was that it was somehow behind Oswald's mention of Jarman and Norman under interrogation.

Care to explain why you thought to post this?

You seem to prefer the interpretations which you believe exonerate Oswald ...

I prefer interpretations that are supported by corroborated documented evidence. I have supplied such. Didn't see any by Lance. I am sure he appreciates you championing his cause, even if seemingly abandoned by David.

PS How could I claim full credit Tommy? Would you?

Well, Oh Great Communicator, if you want me to speak for Lance, I would have to say that (going from memory here) Oswald was either in the Domino Room until about 12:26, or he wasn't in the Domino Room at all around lunch time, and took a calculated risk in uttering to the authorities, afterwards, that he'd seen "Junior" and another Negro pass through a section of the first floor during lunchtime.

Will that suffice?

--  MWT  ;)
« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 05:37:58 PM by Thomas Graves »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #132 on: September 14, 2019, 05:27:59 PM »


Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #133 on: September 14, 2019, 05:57:10 PM »
How many different questions are there therein that haven't already haven't attempted to answer?

Inability to address again noted. I guess I could have used successive instead.....

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #134 on: September 14, 2019, 06:12:09 PM »
Well, Oh Great Communicator, if you want me to speak for Lance, I would have to say that (going from memory here) Oswald was either in the Domino Room until about 12:26, or he wasn't in the Domino Room at all around lunch time, and took a calculated risk in uttering to the authorities, afterwards, that he'd seen "Junior" and another Negro pass through a section of the first floor during lunchtime.

Will that suffice?

--  MWT  ;)

I don’t want you to speak on Lance's behalf, you chose to join in to defend his legal reputation. Then his unsupported use of the word "seldom" to promote the rather puerile notion that by mentioning Jarman and Norman having lunch with him, would provide some form of alibi for Oswald.
 
Perhaps you could theorise why Bookout wrote that Oswald claimed they walked through the lunch room.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #134 on: September 14, 2019, 06:12:09 PM »


Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2693
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #135 on: September 14, 2019, 06:12:54 PM »
Inability to address again noted. I guess I could have used successive instead.....

Yes, proper syntax, grammar and vocabulary are essential, especially when trying to talk one's way out of a DUI, which I did four times, iirc, while I was still imbibing.

Care to rephrase the question (or was there more than one)?

--  MWT  ;)