The "Domino Room Alibi"

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The "Domino Room Alibi"  (Read 187201 times)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #77 on: September 14, 2019, 08:45:33 AM »
If you listened to the podcast via the link provided earlier all will be revealed. Quickly, a documentary about 1978 on the HSCA shortly followed by "Conspiracy" by Anthony Summers. Then pretty much my own research, access to the WC volumes in my library and later NARA records etc.

Oh yeah?

Great!

What's your "take" on HSCA perjurer John L. Hart's testimony?

Nosenko's?

Tennent H. Bagley's?
https://maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=109752#relPageId=2&tab=page

--  MWT   ;)

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #78 on: September 14, 2019, 08:48:48 AM »
Which meaning of the word? In a legal sense?

LOL

Mull it over while you loiter, Colin.

--  MWT  ;)

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #79 on: September 14, 2019, 08:55:39 AM »
LOL

Mull it over while you loiter, Colin.

--  MWT  ;)

Obviously an inappropriate use of the term and now you can’t defend it. Duck and weave Thomas. Then again linguistics is not my area of expertise. Not mulling just going to check if any reds under my bed.....hopefully back in a bit.

While I wait, how about a non-asinine response to Oswald’s lunchtime roaming? Rare or "the norm" to be with colleagues on the first floor based on the evidence we have?

PS....David has been loitering for a long time....in threads I start I normally respond with alacrity. Hmmm, perhaps expeditiously is a more appropriate.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 08:59:47 AM by Colin Crow »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #80 on: September 14, 2019, 08:58:19 AM »
Obviously an inappropriate use of the term and now you can’t defend it. Duck and weave Thomas. Then again linguistics is not my area of expertise. Not mulling just going to check if any reds under my bed.....hopefully back in a bit.

While I wait, how about a non-asinine response to Oswald’s lunchtime roaming? Rare or "the norm" to be with colleagues on the first floor based on the evidence we have?

Colin,

Get it straight:  You've been maligning Lance Payette by insinuating that he isn't a lawyer, or that he wasn't a lawyer, or that he isn't who he claims to be.

--  MWT   ;)

PS  "Duck and weave"?

I prefer to call it "wending".

Look it up?


« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 09:05:19 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Colin Crow

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1860
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #81 on: September 14, 2019, 09:05:29 AM »
Colin,

Get it straight:  You've been maligning Lance Payette by insinuating that he wasn't a lawyer, or wasn't who he claimed to be.

--  MWT   ;)

No, as you don’t seem to understand, I stated if he was a practicing lawyer I would not hire him based on what I saw in his post on the EF. That is an opinion and I showed where he "made stuff up" that was easily disproved.

You on the other hand have proven nothing (that I did not suspect previously). David introduced his post here, I anxiously await his response.

Good luck with your wending......just be careful I heard you can go blind doing that.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 09:08:47 AM by Colin Crow »

Offline Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2692
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #82 on: September 14, 2019, 09:30:59 AM »
No, as you don’t seem to understand, I stated if he was a practicing lawyer I would not hire him based on what I saw in his post on the EF. That is an opinion and I showed where he "made stuff up" that was easily disproved.

You on the other hand have proven nothing (that I did not suspect previously). David introduced his post here, I anxiously await his response.

Good luck with your wending......just be careful I heard you can go blind doing that.

Colin,

"To insinuate" is not quite the same as "to state," now is it?

Of course you didn't come right out and state that Lance isn't (or wasn't) a lawyer, but you sure-as-hell insinuated it with your asinine rhetorical questions (plural).

So who's "ducking and weaving," now, Crow?

--  MWT  ;)

PS   "prove, proved, proved" is the preferred declension, (or conjugation, or whatever it's called)

PPS  No, it's what Iacoletti is rumored to do on a regular basis in the garden at midnight that makes one grow semi-blind and unable, eventually, to see anything but "blobs," not wending, especially as gracefully as I do it through a crowded coffeehouse with a hot and lid-less cup of coffee.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2019, 09:46:43 AM by Thomas Graves »

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: The "Domino Room Alibi"
« Reply #83 on: September 14, 2019, 10:13:48 AM »
Obviously an inappropriate use of the term and now you can’t defend it. Duck and weave Thomas. Then again linguistics is not my area of expertise. Not mulling just going to check if any reds under my bed.....hopefully back in a bit.

While I wait, how about a non-asinine response to Oswald’s lunchtime roaming? Rare or "the norm" to be with colleagues on the first floor based on the evidence we have?

PS....David has been loitering for a long time....in threads I start I normally respond with alacrity. Hmmm, perhaps expeditiously is a more appropriate.

in threads I start I normally respond with alacrity
>>> Congratulations... is she cute?

Alacrity definition: A rarely used term around here that a snooty pseudo-intellectual uses in an attempt to sound superior.
Expeditiously definition: See above.